WGU D389 Learning Strategies in Higher Education TASK 1, 2, & 3 PASSED ON THE FIRST ATTEMPT

lOMoAR cPSD| 5164833




WGU D389
Learning Strategies in Higher Education

TASK 1, 2, & 3
PASSED ON THE FIRST ATTEMPT



This TASK:
❖ Task 1, 2, & 3 passed on the first
attempt.
❖ This Task is significantly easier to
Understand
❖ This version is improved for clarity, coherence,
and professional tone

,Table of Contents
WQ WQ




D389 TASK 1 ...................................................... 3
WQ WQ




D389 TASK 2 ...................................................... 9
WQ WQ




D389 TASK 3 .................................................... 15
WQ WQ

, lOMoAR cPSD| 51648332




UXM3: Academic Research and Evidence-Based Writing
WQ WQ WQ WQ WQ




D389 TASK 1 WQ WQ




QUOTA Template WQ




Instructions: Complete each section of this template fo WQ WQ WQ WQ WQ WQ WQ




llowing the prompts in the task requirements. WQ WQ WQ WQ W Q WQ




For support, please review the "Information Literacy: Evaluating So
WQ WQ WQ WQ WQ WQ WQ WQ




urces" document found under the Web Links section in Task 1.
WQ W Q WQ WQ WQ WQ WQ WQ WQ WQ




Section 1: Academic Research WQ WQ WQ




Degree program: Health Information Management Care
WQ WQ WQ WQ W Q




er Role: Health Information Manager
WQ WQ WQ WQ




Source 1 – WQ WQ




The following is a credible source; complete the QUOTA analysis to explain why it is cr
WQ WQ WQ WQ WQ WQ WQ WQ WQ WQ WQ WQ W Q WQ WQ WQ




edible. Enter your responses in the table below.
WQ WQ WQ WQ WQ WQ WQ




Table 1: Source 1 QUOTA Analysis
WQ WQ WQ WQ WQ




Title of Article WQ WQ Rethinking Cultural Competence: Shifting to Cultural WQ WQ WQ WQ WQ W




Humility Q




Web Link to the Article: https://doi.org/10 WQ WQ WQ WQ WQWQ




.1177/1178632920970580

Qualified: Explain ho WQ W Q The authors are highly qualified in their fields, representing the
WQ WQ WQ WQ WQ WQ WQ WQ WQ W




w the author's qualific
WQ WQ W Q QNew York State Office of Mental Health, Social Solutions and
WQ WQ WQ WQ WQ WQ WQ WQ WQ W Q




ations, the publisher's WQ W Q Services Research, Nathan S. Kline Institute for Psychiatric Re
WQ WQ WQ WQ WQ WQ WQ W Q




reputation, or both c
WQ W Q WQ WQ search. The article was published in Health Services Insights, a
WQ WQ WQ WQ WQ WQ WQ WQ W Q W




ontribute to the credi WQ W Q WQ peer-
Q




bility of the resource.
WQ WQ W Q reviewed journal and a member of the Committee on Publicatio
WQ WQ WQ WQ WQ WQ WQ WQ W Q




n Ethics. WQ




Up-to- This article was published in December 2020, making it less
WQ WQ WQ WQ WQ WQ WQ WQ WQ




Date: Explain how t WQ W Q WQ W than 5 years old and considered current.
Q WQ WQ WQ WQ WQ WQ




he resource is curr
WQ WQ W Q




ent (published withi
WQ W Q




n the last five years
WQ WQ WQ W Q




).
Objective: Explain There may be some opinions present in the article, but it is still
WQ W Q WQ WQ WQ WQ WQ WQ WQ WQ WQ WQ WQ WQ W Q




whether the resource primarily based on research and experience, therefore, making it
WQ WQ WQ WQ WQ WQ WQ WQ WQ WQ




is objective or still c
W Q WQ a credible source. WQ WQ W Q W Q WQ WQ




redible even if some WQ WQ WQ W Q




bias or opinion is pre
WQ WQ WQ W Q




sent.
True: Explain why you I have confidence in the article due to the numerous references
WQ WQ WQ WQ WQ WQ WQ WQ WQ WQ WQ WQ WQ