ENG2601
Assignment 3 2026
Unique number:
Due date: 21 August 2026
3 DIFFERENT ANSWERS PROVIDED
QUESTION 1
A Critical Analysis of Language Use in “Guidelines for Responsible AI Use in
Academic Writing”
The increased use of artificial intelligence in academic research has created
opportunities for improving efficiency, but it has also raised concerns about
accuracy, plagiarism and intellectual responsibility. The text “Guidelines for
responsible AI use in academic writing” responds to these concerns by explaining
acceptable and unacceptable uses of artificial intelligence in academic work. It uses
an accessible advisory style intended to persuade students and researchers to use
artificial intelligence as a supporting tool rather than as a replacement for human
thought.
, 3 DIFFERENT ANSWERS PROVIDED
QUESTION 1
A Critical Analysis of Language Use in “Guidelines for Responsible AI Use in
Academic Writing”
The increased use of artificial intelligence in academic research has created
opportunities for improving efficiency, but it has also raised concerns about
accuracy, plagiarism and intellectual responsibility. The text “Guidelines for
responsible AI use in academic writing” responds to these concerns by explaining
acceptable and unacceptable uses of artificial intelligence in academic work. It uses
an accessible advisory style intended to persuade students and researchers to use
artificial intelligence as a supporting tool rather than as a replacement for human
thought. This essay critically analyses how the text employs register, tone,
coherence and grammatical expression to communicate this message effectively,
while also identifying several weaknesses that reduce its academic quality.
Register concerns the vocabulary and style selected for a particular audience,
purpose and social context. It may range from formal academic language to casual
or intimate communication (ENG2601 501:24–25). The text mainly uses a
consultative and instructional register because it provides practical guidance to
academics and students. Specialist academic expressions such as “literature
reviews”, “research methodologies”, “data collection”, “self-plagiarism” and
“academic institutions” establish the subject area and show that the intended readers
participate in academic research and writing (Stellenbosch University, 2024).
However, the register is not consistently formal. Conversational expressions such as
“First things first”, “On the flip side” and “Don‟t get caught red-handed” make the
article easier to read, but they would be unsuitable in a strictly academic essay. The
frequent use of contractions, including “don‟t”, “doesn‟t”, “you‟re” and “it‟s”, further
creates an informal relationship with the reader. This mixed register is suitable for an
online guidance article because it makes a serious subject accessible, although it
weakens the formal authority of some arguments.
The tone is mainly advisory, cautionary and persuasive. The writer acknowledges
the usefulness of artificial intelligence by explaining that it can save researchers “a
Assignment 3 2026
Unique number:
Due date: 21 August 2026
3 DIFFERENT ANSWERS PROVIDED
QUESTION 1
A Critical Analysis of Language Use in “Guidelines for Responsible AI Use in
Academic Writing”
The increased use of artificial intelligence in academic research has created
opportunities for improving efficiency, but it has also raised concerns about
accuracy, plagiarism and intellectual responsibility. The text “Guidelines for
responsible AI use in academic writing” responds to these concerns by explaining
acceptable and unacceptable uses of artificial intelligence in academic work. It uses
an accessible advisory style intended to persuade students and researchers to use
artificial intelligence as a supporting tool rather than as a replacement for human
thought.
, 3 DIFFERENT ANSWERS PROVIDED
QUESTION 1
A Critical Analysis of Language Use in “Guidelines for Responsible AI Use in
Academic Writing”
The increased use of artificial intelligence in academic research has created
opportunities for improving efficiency, but it has also raised concerns about
accuracy, plagiarism and intellectual responsibility. The text “Guidelines for
responsible AI use in academic writing” responds to these concerns by explaining
acceptable and unacceptable uses of artificial intelligence in academic work. It uses
an accessible advisory style intended to persuade students and researchers to use
artificial intelligence as a supporting tool rather than as a replacement for human
thought. This essay critically analyses how the text employs register, tone,
coherence and grammatical expression to communicate this message effectively,
while also identifying several weaknesses that reduce its academic quality.
Register concerns the vocabulary and style selected for a particular audience,
purpose and social context. It may range from formal academic language to casual
or intimate communication (ENG2601 501:24–25). The text mainly uses a
consultative and instructional register because it provides practical guidance to
academics and students. Specialist academic expressions such as “literature
reviews”, “research methodologies”, “data collection”, “self-plagiarism” and
“academic institutions” establish the subject area and show that the intended readers
participate in academic research and writing (Stellenbosch University, 2024).
However, the register is not consistently formal. Conversational expressions such as
“First things first”, “On the flip side” and “Don‟t get caught red-handed” make the
article easier to read, but they would be unsuitable in a strictly academic essay. The
frequent use of contractions, including “don‟t”, “doesn‟t”, “you‟re” and “it‟s”, further
creates an informal relationship with the reader. This mixed register is suitable for an
online guidance article because it makes a serious subject accessible, although it
weakens the formal authority of some arguments.
The tone is mainly advisory, cautionary and persuasive. The writer acknowledges
the usefulness of artificial intelligence by explaining that it can save researchers “a
