Border Patrol Practice Exam Questions With Correct Answers

Valid Conclusion or Invalid Conclusion Some of the people who speak Spanish are at my party. - Answer Valid Valid Conclusion or Invalid Conclusion Some lawyers are Supreme Court Justices. - Answer Valid Valid Conclusion or Invalid Conclusion Everyone working for the US Government is a CBP Officer - Answer Invalid Valid Conclusion or Invalid Conclusion All the people who speak Spanish are at my party - Answer Invalid Valid Conclusion or Invalid Conclusion All lawyers are Supreme Court Justices - Answer Invalid Valid Conclusion or Invalid Conclusion Some employees of the US Government are CBP Officers - Answer Valid Valid Conclusion or Invalid Conclusion If a person is not an employee of the US Government, the person is not a CBP Officer - Answer Valid Valid Conclusion or Invalid Conclusion If a criminal is released, the criminal has recieved a pardon - Answer Invalid Valid Conclusion or Invalid Conclusion If a person is not guilty of a felony, that person has not been convicted of a murder - Answer Valid Valid Conclusion or Invalid Conclusion If a person lives in Europe, the person lives in Germany - Answer Invalid Valid Conclusion or Invalid Conclusion If a car runs, the car has gas - Answer Valid Valid Conclusion or Invalid Conclusion If a person is an employee of the US Government, the person is a CBP Officer - Answer Invalid Valid Conclusion or Invalid Conclusion If a criminal is not released, the criminal has not received a pardon - Answer Valid Valid Conclusion or Invalid Conclusion If a person is guilty of a felony, that person has been convicted of murder - Answer Invalid Valid Conclusion or Invalid Conclusion If a person does not live in Europe, the person does not live in Germany - Answer Valid Valid Conclusion or Invalid Conclusion If a car does not run, the car has no gas - Answer Invalid Positive Words or Negative Words All - Answer Positive Positive Words or Negative Words Seldom - Answer Negative Positive Words or Negative Words Some - Answer Positive Positive Words or Negative Words Never - Answer Negative Positive Words or Negative Words Most - Answer Positive Positive Words or Negative Words Always - Answer Positive Positive Words or Negative Words Illegal - Answer Negative Positive Words or Negative Words Prohibited - Answer Negative Positive Prefixes or Negative Prefixes Non- - Answer Negative Positive Prefixes or Negative Prefixes Un- - Answer Negative Positive Prefixes or Negative Prefixes Dis- - Answer Negative What are examples of Connector Words? - Answer Whenever Unless Except Often, crimes are characterized as either malum in se-inherently evil-or malum prohibitum-criminal because they are declared as offenses by a legislature. Murder is an example of the former. Failing to file a tax return illustrates the later. Some jurisdictions no longer distinguish between crimes malum in se and malum prohibitum, although many still do. What is a Validly Conclusion? A) Many jurisdictions no longer distinguish between crimes malum in se and malum prohibitum B) Some jurisdictions still distinguish between crimes malum in se and malum prohibitum C) Some crimes characterized as malum in se are not inherently evil D) Some crimes characterized as malum prohibitum are not declared by a legislature to be an offense E) Sometimes failing to file a tax return is characterized as malum in se - Answer B A trucking company can act as a common carrier-for hire to the general public at published rates. As a common carrier, it is liable for any cargo damage, unless the company can show that it was not negligent. If the company can demonstrate that it was not negligent, then it is not liable for cargo damage. In contrast, a contract carrier (a trucking company hired by a shipper under a specific contract) is only responsible for cargo damage as spelled out in the contract. A Claus Inc. tractor-trailer, acting under contract carrier authority, was involved in the same accident, and its cargo was also damaged. What is a Validly Conclusion? A) If Claus Inc. is liable, then it can show that it was not negligent B) If Claus Inc. cannot show that it was not negligent, then it is not liable C) If Claus Inc. can show that it was not negligent, then it is not liable D) If Nichols Inc. is liable, then it cannot show that it - Answer C A rapidly changing technical environment in government is promoting greater reliance on electronic mail (email) systems. As this usage grows, there are increasing chances of conflict between the users' expectations of privacy and public access rights. In some investigations, access to all e-mail, including those messages stored in archival files and messages outside the scope of the investigation, has been sought and granted. In spite of this, some people send messages through e-mail that would never be said face-to-face or written formally. What cannot be a Validly Conclusion? A) Some e-mail messages that have been requested as part of investigations have contained messages that would never be said face-to-face B) Some messages that people would never say face-to-face are sent in e-mail messages C) Some e-mail messages have been requested as part of investigations D) E-mail messages have not been exempted f - Answer A Phyllis T. is a former Federal employee who was entitled to benefits under the Federal Employee Compensation Act because of a job-related, disabling injury. When an eligible Federal employee has such an injury, the benefit is determined by this test: If the beneficiary is married or has dependents, benefits are 3/4 of the person's salary at the time of the injury; otherwise, benefits are set at 2/3 of the salary. Phyllis T.'s benefits were 2/3 of her salary when she was injured. What is a Validly Conclusion? A) Was married but without dependents B) Was not married and had no dependents C) Was not married but had dependents D) Was married and had dependents E) Had never been married - Answer B