Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Online lezen of als PDF Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Document preview thumbnail
Voorbeeld 2 van de 6 pagina's
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)

PSYC 217 MIDTERM 2 TERMS EXAM QUESTIONS WITH CORRECT ANSWERS LATEST UPDATE 2025/2026

Document preview thumbnail
Voorbeeld 2 van de 6 pagina's

PSYC 217 MIDTERM 2 TERMS EXAM QUESTIONS WITH CORRECT ANSWERS LATEST UPDATE 2025/2026 Anonymous - Answers info collected is not identifiable, P identities hidden from their data. Concern for welfare - Answers ensuring and protecting P well-being, privacy, and safety. Confederate - Answers experimenter's accomplice whose identity is concealed to Ps in experiments. Confidential - Answers Ps cannot be linked to their data. Debriefing - Answers revealing deception to, thank, explain, and restore Ps. Deception - Answers actively misrepresenting info to Ps to mislead them about the study's goal. Ethics codes - Answers provide ethical principles + standards for all areas of professional psychology (goals are to advance and use knowledge and respect civil/human rights + freedom). Exempt research - Answers if there are no risks to Ps (no threat to anonymity; expectation of privacy; manipulation). Fraud - Answers fabricating (inventing) or altering (changing) data to fit hypotheses. Informed consent - Answers Ps are provided with all of the info that may influence their decision to participate. Justice - Answers P benefits and risks are balanced. Minimal risk research - Answers risks are no greater than risks faced in everyday life. Plagiarism - Answers (un)intentionally stealing data and claiming it as your own. REB - Answers board that reviews research projects to see if they meet ethical standards; approval is essential to conduct studies. Respect for persons - Answers respecting autonomy + protecting those who don't have it so Ps choose freely. Risk-benefit analysis - Answers calculating potential Rs and Bs. Secondary use of data - Answers collected data for one study to be used for another. Three Rs - Answers replacement (alternatives/no animal use), reduction (min animals used), refinement (lessen pain/distress as much as possible). TCPS - Answers first standard Canadian ethic code for research involving humans, used as a guideline for researchers (revised to TCPS2). Coefficient omega - Answers more accurate than Cronbach's alpha, measures internal consistency reliability (how well items on a scale measure the same construct). Concurrent validity - Answers criterion validity where scores on a new measure correlate with scores on an established measure. Construct validity - Answers the extent to which a measure truly reflects the theoretical construct it's intended to measure. Content validity - Answers how much a measure represents all parts of the construct it's supposed to cover. Cronbach's alpha - Answers measures internal consistency reliability. Discriminant validity - Answers measure doesn't strongly correlate with measures of unrelated constructs. Face validity - Answers extent to which a test appears to measure what it claims to measure. Inter-rater reliability - Answers agreement consistency between diff raters who record the same behaviour. Internal consistency reliability - Answers how consistent P's responses are across items within the same test/scale. Interval scale - Answers scale with equal intervals b/w values but no true zero. Measurement error - Answers diffs b/w a P's observed score + their true score due to random factors.

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

PSYC 217 MIDTERM 2 TERMS EXAM QUESTIONS WITH CORRECT ANSWERS LATEST
UPDATE 2025/2026

Anonymous - Answers info collected is not identifiable, P identities hidden from their data.

Concern for welfare - Answers ensuring and protecting P well-being, privacy, and safety.

Confederate - Answers experimenter's accomplice whose identity is concealed to Ps in
experiments.

Confidential - Answers Ps cannot be linked to their data.

Debriefing - Answers revealing deception to, thank, explain, and restore Ps.

Deception - Answers actively misrepresenting info to Ps to mislead them about the study's goal.

Ethics codes - Answers provide ethical principles + standards for all areas of professional
psychology (goals are to advance and use knowledge and respect civil/human rights + freedom).

Exempt research - Answers if there are no risks to Ps (no threat to anonymity; expectation of
privacy; manipulation).

Fraud - Answers fabricating (inventing) or altering (changing) data to fit hypotheses.

Informed consent - Answers Ps are provided with all of the info that may influence their decision
to participate.

Justice - Answers P benefits and risks are balanced.

Minimal risk research - Answers risks are no greater than risks faced in everyday life.

Plagiarism - Answers (un)intentionally stealing data and claiming it as your own.

REB - Answers board that reviews research projects to see if they meet ethical standards;
approval is essential to conduct studies.

Respect for persons - Answers respecting autonomy + protecting those who don't have it so Ps
choose freely.

Risk-benefit analysis - Answers calculating potential Rs and Bs.

Secondary use of data - Answers collected data for one study to be used for another.

Three Rs - Answers replacement (alternatives/no animal use), reduction (min animals used),
refinement (lessen pain/distress as much as possible).

TCPS - Answers first standard Canadian ethic code for research involving humans, used as a
guideline for researchers (revised to TCPS2).

, Coefficient omega - Answers more accurate than Cronbach's alpha, measures internal
consistency reliability (how well items on a scale measure the same construct).

Concurrent validity - Answers criterion validity where scores on a new measure correlate with
scores on an established measure.

Construct validity - Answers the extent to which a measure truly reflects the theoretical
construct it's intended to measure.

Content validity - Answers how much a measure represents all parts of the construct it's
supposed to cover.

Cronbach's alpha - Answers measures internal consistency reliability.

Discriminant validity - Answers measure doesn't strongly correlate with measures of unrelated
constructs.

Face validity - Answers extent to which a test appears to measure what it claims to measure.

Inter-rater reliability - Answers agreement consistency between diff raters who record the same
behaviour.

Internal consistency reliability - Answers how consistent P's responses are across items within
the same test/scale.

Interval scale - Answers scale with equal intervals b/w values but no true zero.

Measurement error - Answers diffs b/w a P's observed score + their true score due to random
factors.

Nominal scale - Answers categorical, labels, names without order.

Ordinal scale - Answers ranked categories in ordered levels with unequal intervals between
ranks.

Participant reactivity - Answers Ps changing their behaviour bc they know they're being
observed.

Pearson correlation coefficient (r) - Answers strength + direction of a linear relationship b/w Vs.

Predictive validity - Answers criterion validity showing that a measure accurately predicts future
outcomes it should relate to.

Ratio scale - Answers scale with equal intervals + true zero.

Reliability - Answers consistency of a measurement across time, observers, items.

Split-half reliability - Answers test is divided in half, both scores are correlated (int consistency).

Documentinformatie

Geüpload op
14 december 2025
Aantal pagina's
6
Geschreven in
2025/2026
Type
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)
Bevat
Vragen en antwoorden
€10,55

Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen Binnen 14 dagen na aankoop en voor het downloaden kun je een ander document kiezen. Je kunt het bedrag gewoon opnieuw besteden.
Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn
Direct beschikbaar na je betaling
Online lezen of als PDF

Seller avatar
De reputatie van een verkoper is gebaseerd op het aantal documenten dat iemand tegen betaling verkocht heeft en de beoordelingen die voor die items ontvangen zijn. Er zijn drie niveau’s te onderscheiden: brons, zilver en goud. Hoe beter de reputatie, hoe meer de kwaliteit van zijn of haar werk te vertrouwen is.
joshuawesonga22
3,5
(14)
Verkocht
119
Volgers
2
Items
15107
Laatst verkocht
2 uur geleden


Echte notities, van echte studenten
Elk document op Stuvia is geschreven door een medestudent die hetzelfde vak deed. Zo leer je van iemand die het al heeft gehaald.



Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo makkelijk kan het dus zijn.”

Alisha Student

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Maak nauwkeurige citaten in APA, MLA en Harvard met onze gratis bronnengenerator.

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Veelgestelde vragen