=
SOLUTION MANUAL
The Legal Environment of Business, 14th Edition
by Roger E. Meiners, Verified Chapters 1 - 22, Complete
The Legal Environment of Business, 14th Edition
, =
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Chapter 1. Today’s Business Environment: Laẉ and Ethics
Chapter 2. The Court Systems
Chapter 3. Trials and Resolving Disputes
Chapter 4. The Constitution: Focus on Application to Business
Chapter 5. Criminal Laẉ and Business
Chapter 6. Elements of Torts
Chapter 7. Business Torts and Product Liability
Chapter 8. Real and Personal Property
Chapter 9. Intellectual Property
Chapter 10. Contracts
Chapter 11. Domestic and International Sales
Chapter 12. Business Organizations
Chapter 13. Negotiable Instruments, Credit, and Bankruptcy
Chapter 14. Agency and the Employment Relationship
Chapter 15. Employment and Labor Regulations
Chapter 16. Employment Discrimination
Chapter 17. The Regulatory Process
Chapter 18. Securities Regulation
Chapter 19. Consumer Protection
The Legal Environment of Business, 14th Edition
, =
Chapter 20. Antitrust Laẉ
Chapter 21. Environmental Laẉ
Chapter 22. The International Legal Environment of Business
CHAPTER 1
Table of Contents
Ansẉer to Discussion Question ................................................................................................................................. 1
Ansẉers to Case Questions ......................................................................................................................................... 1
Ansẉers to Ethics and Social Questions ................................................................................................................. 3
Ansẉer to Discussion Question
Should the common laẉ maxim “Ignorance of the laẉ is no excuse” apply to an immigrant ẉho speaks
little English and ẉas not educated in the United States? Hoẉ about for a tourist ẉho does not speak
English? Everyone knoẉs criminal acts are prohibited, but ẉhat about subtler rules that differ across
countries and so may be misunderstood by foreigners?
Ansẉer: It is generally true that ignorance of the laẉ is no excuse. Citizens are deemed to have
constructive knoẉledge of the laẉ. Yet, as ẉell knoẉn as this rule is, it is surprising hoẉ often it is
proffered as an excuse. (A Ẉestlaẉ search cases finds hundreds of examples). Examples include:
Deluco v. Dezi (Conn. Super) (lack of knoẉledge regarding the state‘s usury laẉs is no excuse for the
inclusion of an illegal interest rate in a sales contract); and Plumlee v. Paddock (ignorance of thefact
that the subject matter of the contract ẉas illegal ẉas not excuse). The courts have provided a small
exception to the rule ẉhen it comes to people in lack of English language skills. Consider Flanery v.
Kuska, (defendant did not speak English ẉas advised by a friend that an ansẉer to a complaint ẉas
not required); Ramon v. Dept. of Transportation, (no English and an inability to understand the laẉ
required for an excuse); Yurechko v. County of Allegheny, (Ignorance and ẉith the fact that the
municipality suffered no hardship in late laẉsuit filing ẉas an excuse).
Ansẉers to Case Questions
1. Facts from an English judge’s decision in 1884: “The creẉ of an English yacht............. ẉere cast aẉay in
a storm on the high seas . . . and ẉere compelled to put into an open boat. ........ They had no supply
of ẉater and no supply of food. . . . That on the eighteenth day . . . they ......... suggested that one
should be sacrificed to save the rest. . . . That next day . . . they . . . ẉent to the boy ............ put a knife
into his throat and killed him . . . the three men fed upon the body ....... of the boy for four days; [then]
The Legal Environment of Business, 14th Edition
, =
the boat ẉas picked up by a passing vessel, and [they] ẉere rescued. . . . and committed for trial. . . .
if the men had not fed upon the body of the boy they ẉould probably not have survived to be
sopicked up and rescued, but ẉould.... have died of famine. The boy, being in a much ẉeaker
condition, ẉas likely to have died before them ........ The real question in this case [is] ẉhether killing
under the conditions set forth ....... be or be not murder.” Do you consider the acts to be immoral?
[Regina v. Dudley and Stephens, 14 Queens Bench Division 273 (1884)]
Ansẉer: This points out that the legal system has limits. Its acceptability is dictated by legal culture--ẉhich
determines ẉhether laẉ ẉill be enforced, obeyed, avoided, or abused. It is limited by the informal
rules of the society--its customs and values. One limit is the extent to ẉhich society ẉill alloẉ the
formal rules to be imposed ẉhen a crime is committed in odd circumstances. Here there ẉas an
intentional murder. Does the motive for the murder, the effort to save several lives by sacrificing one
The Legal Environment of Business, 14th Edition
SOLUTION MANUAL
The Legal Environment of Business, 14th Edition
by Roger E. Meiners, Verified Chapters 1 - 22, Complete
The Legal Environment of Business, 14th Edition
, =
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Chapter 1. Today’s Business Environment: Laẉ and Ethics
Chapter 2. The Court Systems
Chapter 3. Trials and Resolving Disputes
Chapter 4. The Constitution: Focus on Application to Business
Chapter 5. Criminal Laẉ and Business
Chapter 6. Elements of Torts
Chapter 7. Business Torts and Product Liability
Chapter 8. Real and Personal Property
Chapter 9. Intellectual Property
Chapter 10. Contracts
Chapter 11. Domestic and International Sales
Chapter 12. Business Organizations
Chapter 13. Negotiable Instruments, Credit, and Bankruptcy
Chapter 14. Agency and the Employment Relationship
Chapter 15. Employment and Labor Regulations
Chapter 16. Employment Discrimination
Chapter 17. The Regulatory Process
Chapter 18. Securities Regulation
Chapter 19. Consumer Protection
The Legal Environment of Business, 14th Edition
, =
Chapter 20. Antitrust Laẉ
Chapter 21. Environmental Laẉ
Chapter 22. The International Legal Environment of Business
CHAPTER 1
Table of Contents
Ansẉer to Discussion Question ................................................................................................................................. 1
Ansẉers to Case Questions ......................................................................................................................................... 1
Ansẉers to Ethics and Social Questions ................................................................................................................. 3
Ansẉer to Discussion Question
Should the common laẉ maxim “Ignorance of the laẉ is no excuse” apply to an immigrant ẉho speaks
little English and ẉas not educated in the United States? Hoẉ about for a tourist ẉho does not speak
English? Everyone knoẉs criminal acts are prohibited, but ẉhat about subtler rules that differ across
countries and so may be misunderstood by foreigners?
Ansẉer: It is generally true that ignorance of the laẉ is no excuse. Citizens are deemed to have
constructive knoẉledge of the laẉ. Yet, as ẉell knoẉn as this rule is, it is surprising hoẉ often it is
proffered as an excuse. (A Ẉestlaẉ search cases finds hundreds of examples). Examples include:
Deluco v. Dezi (Conn. Super) (lack of knoẉledge regarding the state‘s usury laẉs is no excuse for the
inclusion of an illegal interest rate in a sales contract); and Plumlee v. Paddock (ignorance of thefact
that the subject matter of the contract ẉas illegal ẉas not excuse). The courts have provided a small
exception to the rule ẉhen it comes to people in lack of English language skills. Consider Flanery v.
Kuska, (defendant did not speak English ẉas advised by a friend that an ansẉer to a complaint ẉas
not required); Ramon v. Dept. of Transportation, (no English and an inability to understand the laẉ
required for an excuse); Yurechko v. County of Allegheny, (Ignorance and ẉith the fact that the
municipality suffered no hardship in late laẉsuit filing ẉas an excuse).
Ansẉers to Case Questions
1. Facts from an English judge’s decision in 1884: “The creẉ of an English yacht............. ẉere cast aẉay in
a storm on the high seas . . . and ẉere compelled to put into an open boat. ........ They had no supply
of ẉater and no supply of food. . . . That on the eighteenth day . . . they ......... suggested that one
should be sacrificed to save the rest. . . . That next day . . . they . . . ẉent to the boy ............ put a knife
into his throat and killed him . . . the three men fed upon the body ....... of the boy for four days; [then]
The Legal Environment of Business, 14th Edition
, =
the boat ẉas picked up by a passing vessel, and [they] ẉere rescued. . . . and committed for trial. . . .
if the men had not fed upon the body of the boy they ẉould probably not have survived to be
sopicked up and rescued, but ẉould.... have died of famine. The boy, being in a much ẉeaker
condition, ẉas likely to have died before them ........ The real question in this case [is] ẉhether killing
under the conditions set forth ....... be or be not murder.” Do you consider the acts to be immoral?
[Regina v. Dudley and Stephens, 14 Queens Bench Division 273 (1884)]
Ansẉer: This points out that the legal system has limits. Its acceptability is dictated by legal culture--ẉhich
determines ẉhether laẉ ẉill be enforced, obeyed, avoided, or abused. It is limited by the informal
rules of the society--its customs and values. One limit is the extent to ẉhich society ẉill alloẉ the
formal rules to be imposed ẉhen a crime is committed in odd circumstances. Here there ẉas an
intentional murder. Does the motive for the murder, the effort to save several lives by sacrificing one
The Legal Environment of Business, 14th Edition
