Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Online lezen of als PDF Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Case uitwerking

PHI 413V Benchmark – Patient’s Spiritual Needs: Case Analysis

Beoordeling
-
Verkocht
1
Pagina's
5
Cijfer
A+
Geüpload op
09-02-2021
Geschreven in
2020/2021

Benchmark – Patient’s Spiritual Needs: Case Analysis Patient’s Decision and Autonomy in Ethics It remains unclear, if James was included in the decision-making of his care. Before the decline of his health, he was fully healthy and capable to understand the extent of his illness and should his father truly make the decisions without any input from James, a disrespect to James’ autonomy would be very clear. Respect for autonomy is defined as “A principle that requires respect for the decision-making capacities of autonomous persons.” The consideration whether the decisions that would been made by James would be helpful or not, or if he is too young to take part of this process, is in questions but the exclusion from a bioethical standpoint makes Mike irresponsible. As stated by (Meilander, 2013 p 99), “Our task is not to judge the worth of this person’s life relative to other possible or actual lives. Our task is to care for the life he has as best we can.” As this is unrelated to James’ case and the disease process, Mike based his decisions solely on his faith and what he has witness from community members. Such decision-making brings disrespect to James as a person and his autonomy. The physician should not allow Mike to make the decision of treatment solely by himself and rather include James to prevent the violation of patient autonomy.

Meer zien Lees minder
Instelling
Vak

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

Running head: Benchmark – Patient’s Spiritual Needs Benchmark – Patient’s Spiritual Needs: Case Analysis Grand Canyon University: PHI 413V
Date1 BENCHMARK – PATIENT’S SPIRITUAL NEEDS
Benchmark – Patient’s Spiritual Needs: Case Analysis
Patient’s Decision and Autonomy in Ethics It remains unclear, if James was included in the decision-making of his care. Before the decline of his health, he was fully healthy and capable to understand the extent of his illness and should his father truly make the decisions without any input from James, a disrespect to James’ autonomy would be very clear. Respect for autonomy is defined as “A principle that requires respect for the decision-making capacities of autonomous persons.” The consideration whether the decisions that would been made by James would be helpful or not, or if he is too young to take part of this process, is in questions but the exclusion from a bioethical standpoint makes Mike irresponsible. As stated by (Meilander, 2013 p 99), “Our task is not to judge the worth of this person’s life relative to other possible or actual lives. Our task is to care for the life he has as best we can.” As this is unrelated to James’ case and the disease process, Mike based his decisions solely on his faith and what he has witness from community members. Such decision-
making brings disrespect to James as a person and his autonomy. The physician should not allow
Mike to make the decision of treatment solely by himself and rather include James to prevent the
violation of patient autonomy. Ethical Decision Making and Patient Autonomy Sickness in the eyes of Christians should be seen as a way of God to work through them. Jesus replies “. Neither this man nor his parents sinned," said Jesus, "but this happened so that the works of God might be displayed in him.”’ Ministers and healthcare workers are those, who receive a special call to care for the needy around us as part of their vacation in order to achieve a state of “shalom”. As stated by (Shelly & Miller, 2012 pp 141-142) “He gives to the sufferer the dignity of being united with him in his own suffering, and he gives to all of us the duty of 2

Geschreven voor

Instelling
Vak

Documentinformatie

Geüpload op
9 februari 2021
Aantal pagina's
5
Geschreven in
2020/2021
Type
Case uitwerking
Docent(en)
N\\a
Cijfer
A+

Onderwerpen

€15,25
Krijg toegang tot het volledige document:

Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen Binnen 14 dagen na aankoop en voor het downloaden kun je een ander document kiezen. Je kunt het bedrag gewoon opnieuw besteden.
Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn
Direct beschikbaar na je betaling
Online lezen of als PDF

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
De reputatie van een verkoper is gebaseerd op het aantal documenten dat iemand tegen betaling verkocht heeft en de beoordelingen die voor die items ontvangen zijn. Er zijn drie niveau’s te onderscheiden: brons, zilver en goud. Hoe beter de reputatie, hoe meer de kwaliteit van zijn of haar werk te vertrouwen is.
TESTSOURCE Chamberlain College Of Nursing
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
524
Lid sinds
5 jaar
Aantal volgers
485
Documenten
1536
Laatst verkocht
4 maanden geleden
STUDY GUIDES/EXAMS AND NOTES ALL VERIFIED BY EXPERTS TO GUARANTEE AN EXCELLENT SCORE

All my uploaded documents, exams and essays are verified by relevant experts. I can assure an A or at least 90%. If any of my documents will not meet your standard, kindly message me and I shall have a solution to rectify the same.

3,5

94 beoordelingen

5
36
4
12
3
25
2
7
1
14

Populaire documenten

Recent door jou bekeken

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo makkelijk kan het dus zijn.”

Alisha Student

Veelgestelde vragen