Compulsory cover page group assignment
Online Consumer Behaviour Research
CITM2.OCBR May 2020 first chance
Your name (one handing in) student number
Thyra van der Schoor 182149
Other team members
Name student number
Noortje van Campenhout 182266
Tessa van de Pol 183163
Indra Eisma 192202
Class
ITM-RH3
BUAS Online Consumer Behaviour Research 2019-2020 v32 Page 1
,Before you start
0.1 Team agreements before starting work
You will have to carry out and present the work as a team. It is therefore important to make
clear and transparent agreements about the allocation of tasks within the team. Draw up a
short team contract, and make sure everyone in the team keeps to the contract. See each
other as work colleagues, not as friends. If any disputes arise within the team, the contract
might be very important. In particular, the contract should describe the measures that will be
taken if team members fail to attend lectures or workshops, do not make a sufficient
contribution, arrive late for meetings, or do not complete their work on time.
Maximum of one A4. Attach your contract here.
Team agreement
Group 1 – RH03
Team members:
Thyra van der Schoor 182149
Indra Eisma 192202
Noortje van Campenhout 182266
Tessa van de Pol 183163
Rules and measures:
• If someone does not participate, they will first get a warning
• If after the first warning they still do not participate, an email will be sent to the
teacher
• Everyone is in TEAMS on time
• If you cannot attend a meeting, inform the other group members beforehand
(preferably a day before)
• Everyone pulls their weight and the work should be of sufficient quality
• If someone does not attend multiple times, an email will be sent to the
teacher, who then will decide what happens
• All the work should be done before the deadline and in the week the
assignment is given
BUAS Online Consumer Behaviour Research 2019-2020 v32 Page 2
,0.2 Attendance
Though we work online, we think it is still very relevant to keep a grip on this.
Attendance
Keep track of attendance during workshops
Names Tessa Thyra Indra Noortje
Week 1 Present Present Present Not present
Week 2 Present Present Present Present
Week 3 Present Present Present Present
Week 4 Present Present Present Present
Week 5 Present Present Present Present
If somebody hasn't been in (can be for or a good reason), please indicate below why,
the arrangements you made etc.
Noortje had to go to the general practitioner and mentioned this on forehand. Later that week
we called with each other and everyone contributed with making the assignment.
0.3 Evaluation
Just before the work is handed in: include a short evaluation by each person about the
course and the collaboration within the team (peer evaluation).
Half an A4 is the maximum.
Tessa van de Pol: I enjoyed this course more than I thought I would. The lectures and
workshops were very interesting! I believe everyone participated equally and we all did our
utmost to get the best result possible. I think everyone should receive the same grade for the
group part.
Thyra van de Schoor: I believe everyone participated wonderfully and we all worked hard
for this course. We all did our best during the workshops and attended all meetings. We
worked on this report as a group, so I believe we all should receive the same grade for the
group part.
Indra Eisma: I think that the assignment was interesting. The research about Sziget and
their social media platforms was a good way to learn more about targeting, advertising and
making a good questionnaire. However, I do think that the assignment was too much work. A
lot of time was spent on all assignments. The assignments we had to finish during the
workshops were very long as well. I believe the group worked together very well. The tasks
were divided and everyone did their part. Every group member was participated in the group
meetings as well. I think it would be fair if every group member receives the same grade.
Noortje van Campenhout: I think everyone participated in a good way in this group on the
assignment. We have been working on the assignment during the workshops, but we have
also met besides the workshops and I think everyone really did their best to attend every
meeting as good as possible and to really collaborate in a good way for the assignment. In
my opinion it would be fair for the group part to receive the same grade.
BUAS Online Consumer Behaviour Research 2019-2020 v32 Page 3
, Part 1
This part is for the workshops
Many of the workshops assignments are input for the
group assignment
It is not graded but should be complete and sufficient
Please hand in one document including part 1, part 2
and 3 before the deadline
BUAS Online Consumer Behaviour Research 2019-2020 v32 Page 4
Online Consumer Behaviour Research
CITM2.OCBR May 2020 first chance
Your name (one handing in) student number
Thyra van der Schoor 182149
Other team members
Name student number
Noortje van Campenhout 182266
Tessa van de Pol 183163
Indra Eisma 192202
Class
ITM-RH3
BUAS Online Consumer Behaviour Research 2019-2020 v32 Page 1
,Before you start
0.1 Team agreements before starting work
You will have to carry out and present the work as a team. It is therefore important to make
clear and transparent agreements about the allocation of tasks within the team. Draw up a
short team contract, and make sure everyone in the team keeps to the contract. See each
other as work colleagues, not as friends. If any disputes arise within the team, the contract
might be very important. In particular, the contract should describe the measures that will be
taken if team members fail to attend lectures or workshops, do not make a sufficient
contribution, arrive late for meetings, or do not complete their work on time.
Maximum of one A4. Attach your contract here.
Team agreement
Group 1 – RH03
Team members:
Thyra van der Schoor 182149
Indra Eisma 192202
Noortje van Campenhout 182266
Tessa van de Pol 183163
Rules and measures:
• If someone does not participate, they will first get a warning
• If after the first warning they still do not participate, an email will be sent to the
teacher
• Everyone is in TEAMS on time
• If you cannot attend a meeting, inform the other group members beforehand
(preferably a day before)
• Everyone pulls their weight and the work should be of sufficient quality
• If someone does not attend multiple times, an email will be sent to the
teacher, who then will decide what happens
• All the work should be done before the deadline and in the week the
assignment is given
BUAS Online Consumer Behaviour Research 2019-2020 v32 Page 2
,0.2 Attendance
Though we work online, we think it is still very relevant to keep a grip on this.
Attendance
Keep track of attendance during workshops
Names Tessa Thyra Indra Noortje
Week 1 Present Present Present Not present
Week 2 Present Present Present Present
Week 3 Present Present Present Present
Week 4 Present Present Present Present
Week 5 Present Present Present Present
If somebody hasn't been in (can be for or a good reason), please indicate below why,
the arrangements you made etc.
Noortje had to go to the general practitioner and mentioned this on forehand. Later that week
we called with each other and everyone contributed with making the assignment.
0.3 Evaluation
Just before the work is handed in: include a short evaluation by each person about the
course and the collaboration within the team (peer evaluation).
Half an A4 is the maximum.
Tessa van de Pol: I enjoyed this course more than I thought I would. The lectures and
workshops were very interesting! I believe everyone participated equally and we all did our
utmost to get the best result possible. I think everyone should receive the same grade for the
group part.
Thyra van de Schoor: I believe everyone participated wonderfully and we all worked hard
for this course. We all did our best during the workshops and attended all meetings. We
worked on this report as a group, so I believe we all should receive the same grade for the
group part.
Indra Eisma: I think that the assignment was interesting. The research about Sziget and
their social media platforms was a good way to learn more about targeting, advertising and
making a good questionnaire. However, I do think that the assignment was too much work. A
lot of time was spent on all assignments. The assignments we had to finish during the
workshops were very long as well. I believe the group worked together very well. The tasks
were divided and everyone did their part. Every group member was participated in the group
meetings as well. I think it would be fair if every group member receives the same grade.
Noortje van Campenhout: I think everyone participated in a good way in this group on the
assignment. We have been working on the assignment during the workshops, but we have
also met besides the workshops and I think everyone really did their best to attend every
meeting as good as possible and to really collaborate in a good way for the assignment. In
my opinion it would be fair for the group part to receive the same grade.
BUAS Online Consumer Behaviour Research 2019-2020 v32 Page 3
, Part 1
This part is for the workshops
Many of the workshops assignments are input for the
group assignment
It is not graded but should be complete and sufficient
Please hand in one document including part 1, part 2
and 3 before the deadline
BUAS Online Consumer Behaviour Research 2019-2020 v32 Page 4
