100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Lees online óf als PDF Geen vaste maandelijkse kosten 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Samenvatting

Summary Course 2.1 Cognitive Psychology - Thinking and Remembering

Beoordeling
4,0
(1)
Verkocht
7
Pagina's
45
Geüpload op
02-08-2018
Geschreven in
2017/2018

I offer you a complete summary of the first course of the second year of psychology. Lectures are also included. I added a lot of colours and graphics to make studying nicer and easier - It's like reading a good textbook, but way shorter. You can be sure that I included all important information for this course as me & a lot of friends studied with these summaries last year. So good luck with your studies and I hope you enjoy my summaries!

Meer zien Lees minder











Oeps! We kunnen je document nu niet laden. Probeer het nog eens of neem contact op met support.

Documentinformatie

Geüpload op
2 augustus 2018
Aantal pagina's
45
Geschreven in
2017/2018
Type
Samenvatting

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

BLOK 2.1 - actively coordinate ongoing mental activities
- lets you keep information alive & accessible, so that you can use it in a wide
COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY
variety of cognitive tasks
LECTURE #1 Long-Term Memory
ROOTS OF COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY => large capacity & contains memory for experiences & information
Plato – Rationalism that have accumulated over a lifetime
=> people use rational thoughts to create knowledge - some research supports that working & long-term memory are the same
-> thinking & logical analysis -> but they may not share same theoretical explanations
Aristotle – Empiricism - performance on everyday tasks different to performance in psychological labs
=> people acquire their knowledge through their
observations of the world around them
-> experience & observation CLASSIC RESEARCH ON WM
Cognitive Revolution
-> intellectual movement 1950-1960s “MAGICAL 7” by George Miller
-> started studying relevant functions in artificial intelligence =-> proposed that we can hold only a limited number of items in
-> observing outward behaviour & its relation to brain activity -> building WM
computational models of the mind - about 7 items (give or take 2) -> 5-9 items
-> mind = complex system composed of many interacting parts Chunks
Cognition by Neisser => memory unit that consists of several components that are strongly associated
“ those processes by which the sensory input is w/ one another
transformed, reduced, elaborated, stored, recovered, -> e.g.: imagine that someone hears a list like “H, O, P, T, R, A, S, L, U,” and so on. If
& used” the person thinks of these as individual letters, then she will remember seven of
them, more or less. But if the same person reorganizes the list and, in particular,
#1 LEARNING TO REMEMBER thinks of the letters as forming syllables (“HOP, TRA, SLU, . . .”), she’ll remember
five or six of these syllables—and therefore 15 to 18 letters.
DIFFERENCE BETWEEN SHORT-TERM MEMORY & WM -> describes the basic unit in WM
->short-term memory is very short (2 min) not lasting passive storage of -> was unusual because he wrote the article when behaviourism was popular –
information article proposed that people engage in internal mental processes in order to
-> working memory is storage plus manipulation convert stimuli into a manageable number of chunks
-> emphasized that our cognitive processes are active
WORKING MEMORY
THE BROWN/PETERSON & PETERSON TECHNIQUE
=> the brief, immediate memory for material that you are currently
=> demonstrated that material held in memory for less than a
processing
minute is frequently forgotten
1

,Exp.: people studied 3 letters, then they said a 3-digit number & counted - modelled after a computer (input, storage, processing)
backwards by threes from this number for a short period (prevented them from -> information progresses through the system in series of stages (one @ a time,
rehearsing the letters), then they had to recall the letters -> first few trials recalled forgetting occurs @ all stages)
most of them; after several trials = poor recall; after 5-sec delay = forgot half of it - Control Processes (intentional strategies e.g.: rehearsal)
=> provided important information about the fragility of memory -> to improve memory
for material stored for just a few seconds Sensory Memory
=> a storage that records information from each of the senses w/ reasonable
THE RECENCY EFFECT
accuracy
-> Serial Position Effect
-> information is stored for 2 sec or less -> then most of it is forgotten
=> refers to the U-shaped relationship between a word’s position
Short-Term Memory
in a list & its probability of recall
=> contains only the small amount of information that we’re actively using
-> very common
- memories = fragile (but not as much as in sensory memory)
-> shows both – strong recency & strong primacy effect
- draws from LTM: retrieval
=> better recall for items @ the end of the list – many have argued that this is
- memory can be lost within about 30 sec unless they’re somehow repeated
because these items were still in short-term memory
Long-Term Memory
@ the end of recall (shows size of WM -> count number of items @ the end of the
=> has an enormous capacity; contains memories that are decades old
list) -> size estimated to be 2-7 items
- memories are relatively permanent & not likely to be lost
ATKINSON & SHIFFRIN’S MODEL - forgetting (gets worse w/ increasing age – 60+; depends on manner of encoding,
=> proposed that memory can be understood as a sequence of retrieval & strategy)
discrete steps, in which information is transferred from one stage
Attention
area to another
=> representation of the world is an active registration of our physical surrounding
=> acts as a filter that determines which stimuli will be processed further & which
won’t
-> to notice a change in a scene (spotlight)

Research on Forgetting
by Ebbinghaus
- 1st to study human memory
- used nonsense syllable strings (CUV, ZIR etc) as study materials (free of meaning)
-> he was his own participant
=> results: steep forgetting @ first, levels off after a day, after 31 days some
- WM & long-term memory are separate memory is retained -> rate of forgetting isn’t constant & diminishes over time
- memories in WM are fragile & could be lost within about 30 sec unless they’re
repeated
2

,THE WORKING-MEMORY APPROACH / MULTICOMPONENT APPROACH Phonological Loop
by Baddeley & Hitch => processes a limited number of sounds for a short period of time
-> pronunciation time can be explained by the limited storage
Short-Term Memory
-> short words => shorter pronunciation => rehearsing a large number of them
-> its major function is to hold several interrelated bits of information – so that this
quickly
information can be worked with & used appropriately
-> long words => longer pronounciation => some words will get lost
-> necessary for a wide of cognitive tasks (e.g.: language comprehension, mental
-> relationship between pronunciation time & recall accuracy holds true whether
arithmetic, reasoning, problem solving)
pronouncing aloud our using subvocalization (silently)
=> immediate memory is a multipart system that temporarily holds & manipulates
- Acoustic Confusion: people are likely to confuse similar-sounding stimuli
information as we perform cognitive tasks
-> emphasizes that WM isn’t simply a passive storage -> emphasis is on the Visuospatial Sketchpad
manipulation of information => processes both visual & spatial information
=> WM is more like a workbench where material is constantly being -> allows you to look @ a complex scene & gather visual information about objects
handled, combined, transformed & landmarks
-> navigates from one location to another
-> allows you to store a coherent picture of both the visual appearance of the
objects & their relative positions in a scene + visual information that you encode
from verbal stimuli
-> limited capacity
-> difficulty performing two visuospatial tasks simultaneously

Central Executive
=> integrates information from the phonological loop, the visuospatial
sketchpad, the episodic buffer & the LTM
=> plays major role in focusing attention, planning strategies, transforming
information, & coordinating behaviour => extremely important & complex
-> has a link with the LONG-TERM MEMORY
-> responsible for suppressing irrelevant information (helps you decide what to do
-> study contradicted the view that WM has only about 7 slots & suggested that & what not)
people can perform two tasks simultaneously (verbal & visual tasks can interfere -> plans & coordinates but doesn’t store information
w/ each other) -> critical role in the overall functions of WM
-> WM seems to have several components which can operate independently of -> limited ability to perform simultaneous tasks -> can’t make numerous decisions
each other @ the same time & can’t work effectively on two simultaneous projects ->
daydreaming requires the active participation of your central executive – can
occupy large portions of the resources
3

, Episodic Buffer Decay Theory
=> serves as a temporary storehouse where we can gather & combine => theory about forgetting
information from the loop, sketchpad & LTM -> memory fades due to the passing of time
=> the component of WM where auditory, visual, & spatial information -> mostly affects WM
can be combined w/ information from the LTM
Interference Theory
-> opinions about people etc…
=> memory overwritten
-> serves for more interaction between all components
++ more accepted
-> actively manipulates information so that you can interpret an earlier experience,
- Retroactive (= forgetting that occurs because of interference from
solve new problems & plan future activities
material encountered AFTER learning)
-> limited capacity
- Proactive (= forgetting occurs because of interference from material
-> allows to create a richer, more complex representation of an event
encountered BEFORE learning)
// doesn’t include other sensory inputs
// hasn’t been researched much
// some say memory is a continuum MEMORY STRATEGIES
FACTORS AFFECTING WM’S CAPACITY -> you perform mental activities that can help you improve your encoding &
- Chunking Strategy retrieval
-> increasing number of items by using chunks -> most strategies focus on the past
- Pronunciation Time
-> strongly influences the number of items we can store in WM Divided Attention
-> better recall of words from a list of countries w/ short names than w/ -> memory performance is substantially reduced if people had used divided
long names (greater number of syllables – lower memory span) attention during the encoding phase
=> pronunciation rate + number of chunks need to be considered when -> music = introverts are more distracted by background music than extroverts –
discussing capacity of WM can’t focus their attention on the memory task
- Semantic Similarity Levels of Processing
=> importance of the acoustic properties of stimuli (sound) -> more accurate recall of information if it’s processed @ a deep level rather than
-> Semantics = meaning of words & sentences a shallow level
-> meaning of words can also have an important effect on the number of -> because of elaboration & distinctiveness
items you can store - rich & elaborate encoding (relating to prior knowledge etc.) better than simple
-> words that we have previously stores can interfere w/ the recall of new rehearsal -> “why questions” – use deep processing to think about meaning etc. &
words that are similar in meaning -> the degree of semantic similarity is interconnect new material to answer them
related to the amount of interference -> elaborating on the material & analysing it in a complex, meaningful fashion
=> BEST
- Self-Reference Effect
4

Beoordelingen van geverifieerde kopers

Alle reviews worden weergegeven
5 jaar geleden

4,0

1 beoordelingen

5
0
4
1
3
0
2
0
1
0
Betrouwbare reviews op Stuvia

Alle beoordelingen zijn geschreven door echte Stuvia-gebruikers na geverifieerde aankopen.

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
De reputatie van een verkoper is gebaseerd op het aantal documenten dat iemand tegen betaling verkocht heeft en de beoordelingen die voor die items ontvangen zijn. Er zijn drie niveau’s te onderscheiden: brons, zilver en goud. Hoe beter de reputatie, hoe meer de kwaliteit van zijn of haar werk te vertrouwen is.
psychoel Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam
Bekijk profiel
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
203
Lid sinds
8 jaar
Aantal volgers
103
Documenten
23
Laatst verkocht
2 jaar geleden

4,1

28 beoordelingen

5
11
4
10
3
6
2
1
1
0

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo makkelijk kan het dus zijn.”

Alisha Student

Veelgestelde vragen