100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Lees online óf als PDF Geen vaste maandelijkse kosten 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Samenvatting

Samenvatting - Research Methods (AM_1255)

Beoordeling
-
Verkocht
-
Pagina's
51
Geüpload op
07-12-2023
Geschreven in
2023/2024

complete abstract research methods (7,5 for the exam)












Oeps! We kunnen je document nu niet laden. Probeer het nog eens of neem contact op met support.

Documentinformatie

Geüpload op
7 december 2023
Aantal pagina's
51
Geschreven in
2023/2024
Type
Samenvatting

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

Research Methods for Health science
Inhoudsopgave
College 1....................................................................................................................................................................1

College 2....................................................................................................................................................................4

College 3....................................................................................................................................................................9

College 4..................................................................................................................................................................12

College 5..................................................................................................................................................................15

College 6..................................................................................................................................................................17

College 7..................................................................................................................................................................22

College 8..................................................................................................................................................................27

College 9..................................................................................................................................................................30

College 10................................................................................................................................................................36

College 11 & 12.......................................................................................................................................................41



College 1

 Students are able to identify current and complex public health challenges
- Climate crisis / environmental impact on health
- Opioid crisis
- Making health care fairer
- Access to medicine
- Health care delivery in areas of conflict and crisis
- Preparing for epidemics
- Anti-microbial resistance
- Public trust (social media misinformation/disinformation)
- Ethical and social implications of new technologies
- Data modernization and privacy
- Food insecurity and food deserts
- Public Health workforce shortage

Across all disciplines, at all levels, and throughout the world, health care is becoming
more complex. What make the current challenges, complex:
- Globalization ‘a world that is becoming increasingly integrated and interdependent’.
- Fuzzy, instead of rigid, boundaries
- Internalized rules drive action

, - Agents within the system change
- Systems are embedded in other systems and co-evolve

 Students are able to explain different epistemological stances (e.g., objectivism,
constructivism), theoretical perspectives (e.g., positivism, interpretivism) and the
relationship between them

Epistemology and Theoretical perspectives and the relationship between them
Epistemology = the study of knowledge
- A knowledge of research philosophy will help the researcher to recognize which
designs will work and which will not.
- It can help to clarify issues of research design especially in interdisciplinary teams.

1. Objectivism: we try to strive to truth so objective as possible. Researchers should
strive not to include their own feelings and values. The research is about discovering
this objective truth and presenting fact as truth. It is connected to the theoretical
perspective Positivism, where there is only one reality/truth, and what can be
observed. Reality can be measured. Knowledge can be formulated into laws  often
deductive driven and measurement through surveys and data records, together with
statistical analysis
2. Constructivism: meaning is created between interaction, truth and meaning do not
exist in some external world. Meaning is constructed by the researcher not discovered.
Researchers are inherently viewing the world through their frame of reference, there
are multiple realities. It is connected to interpretivism: multiple, contradictory but
equally valid accounts of the world can exist, knowledge is contextual.  inductive
driven, multiple data collection methods, such as depth interviews or participation
observation.

,3. Subjectivism: it can differ from constructivism; the meaning is imposed by the subject
on the object subjects do construct meaning, but do so from within collective
unconsciousness, from cultural and religious beliefs. Postmodernism can be taken as
an example of a theoretical perspective linked to subjectivism, Emphasis multiplicity,
ambiguity, ambivalence and fragmentation.
4. Critical inquiry: meta process of investigation and you do not only want to understand
it but also change it. So not only interpret the world but also seek to change it. The
assumption is that ideas are mediated by power relations in society. Also that certain
groups in society are privileged over others and exert an oppressive force on
subordinate groups.

In short:
 Objectivism: There is an objective reality ‘out there’.
 Constructivism: Subjects construct their own meaning in different ways.
 Subjectivism: Meaning is imposed by the subject on the object.

 Students can define and give examples of epistemic injustice in health sciences

Epistemic injustice: injustice related to knowledge, exclusion, silencing,
misrepresentation, undervaluing. We still have the tendency to hear not al voices that
are important and to disregards local and indigenous knowledge and refuses to learn
from people often deemed to be lesser.

 Students can reflect on their own positionality

Exploring your own theory of knowledge and theoretical perspectives is important
because it influences your choices.

 Students are able to formulate an objective and research questions

Objective and research questions: in the beginning of the research process to the
research topic. Research process: literature + problems & questions of the workplace

, or community setting (research agenda’s)  research topic (think about the
knowledge gap you’re aiming to fill)  objective & research question (contributes to
understanding and/or problem solving) with an external and internal objective 
Methodology.
It can be formed by literature or problems & questions of the workplace or community
setting. The first one is theoretical oriented and the other practical. The most important
one is the research gap, so what can de study contribute to the field, what is the niche.
You want to avoid:
- Too big
- Too trivial
- Lack in resources
- Dependent on the completion of another project
- Unethical
-
You want to interpret:
- Useful (relevant)
- Realistic
- Feasible
- Clear
- Informative

Some examples shot to get to a research topic:
- Own previous research
- Experiences from the fieldwork
- Donor informed.
- Patient organization informed.
- Interviewing experts and develop new research agenda.

And then from topic to the objective: what can I contribute to the understanding or
solving the topic, so understanding or it has a practical relevance. It has to be
informative, useful, realistic, feasible and clear.
There are two objectives.
1) external objective = contribution of your research project to solution of the
problem / what results can be expected
2) internal objective = in this study we investigate the effect…= The way in which this
will be done / the insights, information, knowledge needed and is very similar to
your research question

There can be multiple research questions but mostly one objective. They are not set in
stone and establish boundaries. Example: ‘is alcohol abuse at work a problem?’. So
this is a yes/no problem and what do we mean by work? So the question still needs a
lot of work cause it need to be open and certain words to be specified.




College 2

 Students are able to explain inductive and deductive reasoning

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
De reputatie van een verkoper is gebaseerd op het aantal documenten dat iemand tegen betaling verkocht heeft en de beoordelingen die voor die items ontvangen zijn. Er zijn drie niveau’s te onderscheiden: brons, zilver en goud. Hoe beter de reputatie, hoe meer de kwaliteit van zijn of haar werk te vertrouwen is.
July2 Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Bekijk profiel
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
18
Lid sinds
2 jaar
Aantal volgers
7
Documenten
11
Laatst verkocht
4 weken geleden

5,0

1 beoordelingen

5
1
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0

Recent door jou bekeken

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo makkelijk kan het dus zijn.”

Alisha Student

Veelgestelde vragen