100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Lees online óf als PDF Geen vaste maandelijkse kosten 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Samenvatting

Summary Judgement and Decision Making in Accounting

Beoordeling
5,0
(3)
Verkocht
23
Pagina's
20
Geüpload op
27-05-2022
Geschreven in
2021/2022

Samenvatting van alle lectures van Judgement and Decision Making in Accounting, plus korte samenvatting van de papers. Summary of all lectures of Judgement and Decision Making in Accounting, plus smal summaries of the relevant papaers

Meer zien Lees minder










Oeps! We kunnen je document nu niet laden. Probeer het nog eens of neem contact op met support.

Documentinformatie

Geüpload op
27 mei 2022
Aantal pagina's
20
Geschreven in
2021/2022
Type
Samenvatting

Onderwerpen

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

Inhoud
Judgment and Decision making in Accounting................................................................................................................2
Week 1: Introduction: Normative Decision Making.....................................................................................................2
Week 2: How We Attach Value to Things: the role of risk and uncertainty.................................................................6
Week 3: Bounded Awareness and Bounded Rationality pt. 1...................................................................................10
Week 4: Bounded Awareness and Bounded Rationality pt. 2...................................................................................12
Week 5: Social Norms and Social Preferences...........................................................................................................16
Week 6: Ethics in Judgment and Decision Making & Improving Decision Making Processes....................................19




1

,Judgment and Decision making in Accounting


Week 1: Introduction: Normative Decision Making

Lecture 1

What are judgments?
The attachment of value to something (ex. estimates, evaluations, opinions).

What are decisions?
The choice between alternatives.

What are normative models used for?
To see how people should be making judgment and decisions.

What are descriptive models used for?
To see how people actually make judgment and decisions.

What are prescriptive models used for?
To give practical suggestions on designing judgment and decision-making processes based on normative and
descriptive models.

What are normative decisions based on?
On a rational process of decision making where we use all available information in an optimal way to maximize the
expected net outcome.

What are the steps of the rational decision making process?
1) Define the problem;
2) Identify the criteria;
3) Weigh the criteria;
4) Generate alternatives;
5) Rate each alternative on each criteria;
6) Compute the optimal decision.

What is the dual process theory?
The theory that our thinking is split up in System 1 (intuitive) and System 2 (rational) thinking.

What is meant with System 1 thinking?
Our intuitive system which is typically fast, automatic, effortless, implicit, and emotional.

What is meant with System 2 thinking?
Our reasoning that is slower, conscious, effortful, explicit, and logical.

Why is it difficult to make rational decisions?
Because System 2 relies on System 1 for input and System 1 cannot be switched off. System 2 may also not be
employed frequently enough.

What is meant with accessibility?
How easily something comes to mind (perceptions and intuitions come to mind effortlessly).

How does accessibility affect judgments and decisions?
Easily accessible perceptions from System 1 have a disproportionate weight on our judgments and decisions.
2

, What are the determinants of accessibility?
- Perceptual salience;
- Surprisingness;
- Familiarity;
- When things are associated with emotion, potential losses, or are in line with our current ‘mindset’.

What is meant with perceptual salience?
The tendency to use noticeable or observable traits to make a judgment. We emphasize this noticeable or salient
information when making decisions.

What is meant with heuristics?
Simplifying strategies or rules of thumb that people rely on when making decisions. Instead of answering a difficult
question (using System 2), our first impulse is to find an easier accessible answer to a related question using System
1.

What are the four main types of heuristics?
- Availability heuristic;
- Representativeness heuristic;
- Confirmation heuristic;
- Affect heuristic;

What is meant with the availability heuristic?
That things that come to mind easier are judged to be more likely, frequent, probable etc.

What is meant with the representativeness heuristic?
That (probability) judgments are influenced by how typical something is for its ‘category’.

What is meant with the confirmation heuristic?
That judgments are influenced by what we expect. We interpret new information as confirming our existing beliefs.

What is meant with the affect heuristic?
That judgments are affected by our emotional state or mood.

What is meant with utility?
Utility is whatever is maximized (“good”; ”goodness”).

What do we need to do before we can compare utility?
We need to satisfy two assumptions: transitivity and connectedness.

What is meant with transitivity?
If A>B and B>C, then A>C.

What is meant with connectedness?
It is either the case that A>B, or that A<B, or than A=B. This means than we can compare A and B.

What is meant with the expected-utility theory (EUT)?
That individuals should choose the option with the highest expected utility.

What should we do in the expected-utility theory when there is uncertainty?
We should calculate which option has the highest expected utility.

How can we calculate the expected utility?
Expected utility = utility of outcome x probability of outcome.
3

Beoordelingen van geverifieerde kopers

Alle 3 reviews worden weergegeven
1 jaar geleden

1 jaar geleden

3 jaar geleden

3 jaar geleden

Bedankt voor je beoordeling Marco!

5,0

3 beoordelingen

5
3
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0
Betrouwbare reviews op Stuvia

Alle beoordelingen zijn geschreven door echte Stuvia-gebruikers na geverifieerde aankopen.

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
De reputatie van een verkoper is gebaseerd op het aantal documenten dat iemand tegen betaling verkocht heeft en de beoordelingen die voor die items ontvangen zijn. Er zijn drie niveau’s te onderscheiden: brons, zilver en goud. Hoe beter de reputatie, hoe meer de kwaliteit van zijn of haar werk te vertrouwen is.
BramNorder Universiteit van Amsterdam
Bekijk profiel
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
1546
Lid sinds
8 jaar
Aantal volgers
1120
Documenten
10
Laatst verkocht
3 dagen geleden
Accountancy samenvattingen van hoge kwaliteit!

Hallo allemaal! Mijn naam is Bram, een 27 jarige student, die Master Accountancy and Control studeert aan de Universiteit van Amsterdam. Hiervoor heb ik HBO Accountancy gestudeerd aan Hogeschool Inholland. Graag deel ik mijn samenvattingen met jullie! Mijn samenvattingen zijn zo uitgebreid en duidelijk mogelijk. Om dit te realiseren stop ik veel tijd en energie in het maken van mijn samenvattingen. Mijn doel is dat jij door middel van mijn samenvatting jouw toets afsluit met een voldoende. Toch niet tevreden? Dan hoor ik graag wat ik kan verbeteren. Veel succes met je studie!

Lees meer Lees minder
3,9

213 beoordelingen

5
76
4
76
3
42
2
8
1
11

Recent door jou bekeken

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo makkelijk kan het dus zijn.”

Alisha Student

Veelgestelde vragen