Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Online lezen of als PDF Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Overig

Week 5 Case Study ALL ANSWERS 100% CORRECT FALL-2021 SOLUTION GUARANTEED GRADE A+

Beoordeling
-
Verkocht
-
Pagina's
11
Geüpload op
05-12-2021
Geschreven in
2021/2022

Luella Jones, 25 years old Primary Concept Perfusion Interrelated Concepts (In order of emphasis) • Reproduction • Clinical Judgment NCLEX Client Need Categories Percentage of Items from Each Category/Subcategory Covered in Case Study Safe and Effective Care Environment • Management of Care 17-23%  • Safety and Infection Control 9-15% Health Promotion and Maintenance 6-12%  Psychosocial Integrity 6-12%  Physiological Integrity • Basic Care and Comfort 6-12%  • Pharmacological and Parenteral Therapies 12-18%  • Reduction of Risk Potential 9-15%  • Physiological Adaptation 11-17%  RAPID Reasoning Case Study History of Present Problem: Luella Jones is a 25-year-old female patient G1P0 who is currently 40 3/7 weeks gestation. She is admitted to the hospital to be induced for being post-date. She is positive for Group Beta streptococcus and receiving IV antibiotics per protocol. She is 65 inches (162.5 cm). Her pre-pregnancy weight was 115 pounds (52.3 kg). She gained 15 pounds (6.8 kg) during this pregnancy. She just had spontaneous rupture of membranes with a moderate amount of thick meconium fluid. The nurse performed a vaginal check, and her cervix is dilated to 4 cm, 80 percent effaced and -1 station. Pitocin is infusing at 6 mU/minute intravenously. Personal/Social History: Luella lives alone and is no longer involved with the father of her baby. Her family support is limited to her older sister. She smokes one pack of cigarettes a day and has not had a job for over a year and states money is tight. She admits to not eating very healthy during the pregnancy because it is easier to grab chips and pop than cook. She missed a few of her prenatal visits due to transportation issues and did not attend any prenatal classes. Her sister is present as her support person during labor and delivery. What data from the histories are RELEVANT and must be interpreted as clinically significant by the nurse? RELEVANT Data from Present Problem: Clinical Significance: • Gained only 15 lbs with a BMI of 19.7 • I’m not sure if the nurse performed her vaginal check after the rupture of membranes or not BUT if she did… • 4 cm dilated, 80% effaced, -1 station • Meconium = baby poop • (+) GBS • With a BMI of 19.7 before pregnancy, Luella should have gained between 25-35 lbs during her pregnancy w/ an average of gaining 1 lb/day during her 2nd and 3rd trimester she has only gained 15 lbs indicating that the baby may be malnourished and have a lower birth weight than normal once it is delivered. • Luella is at higher risk for infections and vaginal exams should be kept to a minimum to prevent infections • Luella’s bishop scoring is about a 3 if the cervix is soft and the position is anterior • Mucous plug should keep meconium in amniotic fluid, but stress can cause mucous plug to rupture floats around in amniotic fluid where baby can swallow it and get into which is really bad because that means the baby is probably really stressed  this can lead to meconium aspiration pneumonia and need to suction if delivery happened • Increased risked for sepsis RELEVANT Data from Social History: Clinical Significance: • Luella’s support is limited to her sister • Luella does not have a reliable means of transportation • Luella smokes a pack of cigarettes a day • Luella stated money was tight and she has not had a job for over a year • She has not gone to a couple of her prenatal visits • Having a solid support system is key in providing a safe home for the baby as well as making sure Luella is faring well with her new role (both psychologically and physically). • This is concerning because it is important, she show up for her post-pregnancy checkups as well as any pediatric appointments that are coming up in the near future which help ensure the wellbeing of the infant if Luella were to have any concerns. • Smoking while pregnant can have teratogenic effects putting her infant at a high risk for abnormalities secondhand smoking can contribute to SIDs • Not being a stable economic situation puts the infant at risk for not receiving the proper nutrition it needs to grow and mature • This is concerning because this might be a sign of baby/mom mal- attachment because she is not concerned about the well-being of her child Patient Care Begins: Current VS: P-Q-R-S-T Pain Assessment: T: 99.9 F/37.7 C (oral) Provoking/Palliative: Uterine contractions P: 90 (regular) Quality: Severe cramping R: 18 (regular) Region/Radiation: Low pelvis BP: 118/68 Severity: 5/10 O2 sat: 98 % RA Timing: With uterine contractions What VS data are RELEVANT and must be interpreted as clinically significant by the nurse? RELEVANT VS Data: Clinical Significance: • Lower abdominal pain • 99.9 • Vital signs are completely in line with pain rating • contractions are usually higher up but someone can have all back labor and it completely varies • On the higher range infections • But if pulse were to go up that’s also a sign of infection Fetal Monitoring Strip: Interpretation: • Fetus is experiencing late decels with the onset of contractions • No accelerations • HR ~140 is normal • Variability is minimal • No accelerations • V shaped decelerations variable decelerations (not lasting as long) VEAL CHOP • Category indeterminate (definitely not normal, but enough to be concerned about, keep monitoring) • **normal after getting n epidural, blood pressure might drop but should remain calm and change position to see if it improves Clinical Significance: • CHORD COMPRESSIONIndicates fetal hypoxia (poor perfusion) change position of patient to left lateral side (lying) to help with perfusion to baby • No accelerations keep monitoring Current Assessment: GENERAL APPEARANCE: Calm and appears to be resting between contractions. Using breathing techniques during contractions appropriately RESP: Breath sounds clear with equal aeration bilaterally ant/post, nonlabored respiratory effort CARDIAC: Pink, warm & dry, no edema, heart sounds regular with no abnormal beats, pulses strong, brisk cap refill, 1+ bilateral pedal edema NEURO: Alert and oriented to person, place, time, and situation (x4) Maternal/Fetal FHT’s: 140s regular Variability: See monitoring strip to address Accelerations: See monitoring strip to address Decelerations: See monitoring strip to address Contractions: Yes Frequency: Every 3-4 minutes Duration: 60-70 seconds Intensity: Moderate to palpation What assessment data are RELEVANT and must be interpreted as clinically significant by the nurse?

Meer zien Lees minder
Instelling
Vak









Oeps! We kunnen je document nu niet laden. Probeer het nog eens of neem contact op met support.

Geschreven voor

Instelling
Vak

Documentinformatie

Geüpload op
5 december 2021
Aantal pagina's
11
Geschreven in
2021/2022
Type
OVERIG
Persoon
Onbekend

Onderwerpen

€11,15
Krijg toegang tot het volledige document:

Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen Binnen 14 dagen na aankoop en voor het downloaden kun je een ander document kiezen. Je kunt het bedrag gewoon opnieuw besteden.
Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn
Direct beschikbaar na je betaling
Online lezen of als PDF

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
De reputatie van een verkoper is gebaseerd op het aantal documenten dat iemand tegen betaling verkocht heeft en de beoordelingen die voor die items ontvangen zijn. Er zijn drie niveau’s te onderscheiden: brons, zilver en goud. Hoe beter de reputatie, hoe meer de kwaliteit van zijn of haar werk te vertrouwen is.
Allan100 Rasmussen College
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
646
Lid sinds
5 jaar
Aantal volgers
605
Documenten
3231
Laatst verkocht
1 maand geleden

3,5

92 beoordelingen

5
36
4
17
3
15
2
5
1
19

Populaire documenten

Recent door jou bekeken

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo makkelijk kan het dus zijn.”

Alisha Student

Veelgestelde vragen