• Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen
  • Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn
  • Direct beschikbaar na je betaling
  • Online lezen of als PDF
Verkopen
Kies je studieland
Kies je taal
Document preview thumbnail
Voorbeeld 3 van de 18 pagina's
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)

NU 136 Fundamentals of Nursing Clinical Case Studies: Patient Assessment, Nursing Interventions & Rationales (PDF) | 2026–2027 | Galen College of Nursing

Document preview thumbnail
Voorbeeld 3 van de 18 pagina's

INSTANT PDF DOWNLOAD Prepare for NU 136 Fundamentals of Nursing with clinical case studies covering patient assessment, nursing interventions, and clinical judgment. Review symptom recognition, vital signs, care planning, patient safety, prioritization, and evidence-based nursing practices. Ideal for applying nursing concepts to clinical scenarios and preparing for exams for 2026–2027. Patient Assessment Cases, Nursing Intervention Practice, Clinical Reasoning Scenarios, Vital Signs Case Review, Nursing Care Planning, Patient Condition Analysis, Clinical Judgment Practice, Nursing Assessment Questions, Patient Safety Scenarios, Evidence Based Nursing, Symptom Recognition Review, Clinical Decision Making, Nursing Process Practice, Patient Care Scenarios, Nursing Evaluation Methods, Care Plan Development, Clinical Skills Review, Fundamentals Case Studies, NU 136 Study Guide, Nursing Exam Preparation

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

NU 136 | CLINICAL CASE STUDIES | 2026/2027

NU 136

CLINICAL CASE STUDIES
2026/2027 | Patient Assessment & Nursing Interventions
Purpose: Original case-based practice for recognizing patient cues, analyzing assessment
findings, prioritizing concerns, selecting nursing interventions, and evaluating outcomes. These
are educational practice materials, not official NU 136 examination questions.

Clinical safety note: Use the scenarios for study. In actual care, follow current facility
protocols, orders, scope-of-practice requirements, and instructor or licensed-clinician
guidance.



Clinical Case Studies and Questions

Case 1 — Respiratory Deterioration
Case scenario: A 68-year-old client admitted with pneumonia becomes restless and newly
confused. Respiratory rate is 30/min, oxygen saturation is 86% on room air, heart rate is
118/min, and the client is using accessory muscles.

Question 1. Which assessment cue is the highest priority?
New confusion with oxygen saturation of 86%
Temperature of 38.1°C (100.6°F)

Productive cough for two days

Reduced appetite since admission

Correct Answer: A

Detailed Rationale: Hypoxemia with a new mental-status change suggests impaired
oxygenation and acute deterioration. The nurse should immediately assess airway and
breathing and initiate emergency measures according to orders and protocol.

Why the Other Options Are Incorrect



Original educational resource • Follow current clinical policies and instructor guidance

, NU 136 | CLINICAL CASE STUDIES | 2026/2027

A. The combination indicates possible inadequate oxygen delivery to the brain and requires
urgent action.

B. Fever is relevant but does not outweigh the immediate breathing concern.

C. The cough is consistent with the known respiratory illness but is less urgent than
hypoxemia.

D. Reduced appetite is not the immediate threat.

Key Clinical Judgment Concept: Recognize cues: connect oxygenation changes with acute
mental-status changes.



Question 2. What should the nurse do first?
Collect a sputum sample before intervening

Assess airway and breathing, call for assistance, and provide oxygen per protocol/order
Encourage the client to drink water

Complete routine documentation before reassessment

Correct Answer: B

Detailed Rationale: The immediate priority is to address respiratory compromise. Rapid
assessment, help, and oxygen support under the applicable order or emergency protocol
should not be delayed for specimen collection, oral fluids, or documentation.

Why the Other Options Are Incorrect

A. Specimen collection must not delay support for severe hypoxemia.

B. This responds to the immediate threat and brings help to the bedside.

C. Oral fluids do not correct acute hypoxemia and may be unsafe with distress.

D. Documentation must not delay urgent assessment and treatment.

Key Clinical Judgment Concept: Take action: stabilize breathing and escalate promptly.



Question 3. After intervention, which finding best indicates improvement?
Oxygen saturation rises to 94% and work of breathing decreases

Original educational resource • Follow current clinical policies and instructor guidance

, NU 136 | CLINICAL CASE STUDIES | 2026/2027

The client asks to postpone lunch

The cough remains productive

The temperature remains 38.1°C
Correct Answer: A

Detailed Rationale: Improved oxygen saturation together with reduced work of breathing
directly reflects a better respiratory response. Other findings may still need management
but do not best demonstrate improved oxygenation.

Why the Other Options Are Incorrect

A. Both measures indicate improved oxygenation and respiratory effort.

B. Meal preference does not measure respiratory response.

C. A productive cough may persist despite improvement or deterioration.

D. Persistent fever does not directly show whether oxygenation improved.

Key Clinical Judgment Concept: Evaluate outcomes: compare respiratory status with baseline
and expected response.




Case 2 — Postoperative Pain and Safety
Case scenario: A 54-year-old client is six hours after abdominal surgery. The client reports
incisional pain of 7/10, is reluctant to cough, and has shallow respirations. The dressing is dry,
blood pressure is 126/78 mmHg, and oxygen saturation is 95% on room air.

Question 4. Which assessment should the nurse complete before administering the
prescribed opioid analgesic?
Assess pain, sedation level, respiratory status, allergies, and relevant medication history

Ask the client to walk in the hallway

Offer a large meal

Remove the dressing to inspect the incision without a clinical reason

Correct Answer: A




Original educational resource • Follow current clinical policies and instructor guidance

Documentinformatie

Geüpload op
14 oktober 2026
Aantal pagina's
18
Geschreven in
2026/2027
Type
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)
Bevat
Vragen en antwoorden
€10,99

Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen Binnen 14 dagen na aankoop en voor het downloaden kun je een ander document kiezen. Je kunt het bedrag gewoon opnieuw besteden.
Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn
Direct beschikbaar na je betaling
Online lezen of als PDF

Seller avatar
De reputatie van een verkoper is gebaseerd op het aantal documenten dat iemand tegen betaling verkocht heeft en de beoordelingen die voor die items ontvangen zijn. Er zijn drie niveau’s te onderscheiden: brons, zilver en goud. Hoe beter de reputatie, hoe meer de kwaliteit van zijn of haar werk te vertrouwen is.
trevorwilly
3,0
(2)
Verkocht
11
Volgers
0
Items
2170
Laatst verkocht
2 maanden geleden


Echte notities, van echte studenten
Elk document op Stuvia is geschreven door een medestudent die hetzelfde vak deed. Zo leer je van iemand die het al heeft gehaald.



Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo makkelijk kan het dus zijn.”

Alisha Student

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Maak nauwkeurige citaten in APA, MLA en Harvard met onze gratis bronnengenerator.

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Veelgestelde vragen