• Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen
  • Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn
  • Direct beschikbaar na je betaling
  • Online lezen of als PDF
Verkopen
Kies je studieland
Kies je taal
Document preview thumbnail
Voorbeeld 3 van de 26 pagina's
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)

WGU D220 Objective Assessment Review (PDF) | 2026–2027 | Western Governors University

Document preview thumbnail
Voorbeeld 3 van de 26 pagina's

INSTANT PDF DOWNLOAD — Prepare for the WGU D220 Nursing Informatics Objective Assessment with practice questions and answers for 2026–2027. Review healthcare information technology, electronic health records, clinical decision support, data management, patient safety, privacy, and technology in nursing practice. Ideal for nursing students seeking focused revision and exam preparation Nursing Informatics Review, Objective Assessment Prep, Healthcare IT Concepts, Electronic Health Records, Clinical Decision Support, Nursing Data Management, Health Information Systems, Digital Health Practice, Patient Safety Principles, Healthcare Data Security, Privacy and Confidentiality, Clinical Workflow Review, Nursing Documentation, Healthcare Interoperability, Clinical Data Analysis, Evidence-Based Informatics, Quality Improvement Methods, Technology in Nursing, Nursing Exam Questions, Graduate Nursing Revision

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

WGU D220 | OBJECTIVE ASSESSMENT REVIEW




WGU D220

Objective Assessment Review

2026–2027 | Practice Questions & Answers
Information Technology in Nursing Practice
40 original multiple-choice questions • Detailed rationales • Answer key • High-yield review



Independent study resource for practice and remediation. Questions are original and are not official
WGU assessment items.




Original educational practice resource • 2026–2027

, WGU D220 | OBJECTIVE ASSESSMENT REVIEW

Candidate Instructions
• Suggested practice time: 60 minutes for 40 questions. Select the single best answer for each item.
• Try answering all questions before reading the rationales. Mark uncertain items and revisit the related
concept.
• Use clinical judgment and applicable law/policy. Exact workflows and course emphasis may vary, so
confirm expectations in the current WGU course materials.
• This resource is not an official WGU publication, does not reproduce protected assessment content,
and does not guarantee an assessment outcome.



Content Blueprint
• Foundations of nursing informatics, DIKW, and data quality
• Health information systems, EHR functions, and clinical workflow
• Interoperability, standardized terminologies, and data exchange
• Privacy, security, ethical practice, and documentation integrity
• Clinical decision support, medication safety, and evidence-based practice
• Telehealth, patient engagement, analytics, implementation, and quality improvement



Practice Questions
Question 1. Nursing informatics
A nurse uses patient data and information technology to support a safer care decision. Which description
best captures nursing informatics?

A. A specialty focused only on repairing computers
B. Integration of nursing science with information and computer sciences to manage information and
support decisions
C. A method for replacing nursing assessment with automated outputs
D. A billing process used after discharge
Correct answer: B

Detailed rationale: Nursing informatics combines nursing knowledge with information and
computer sciences to manage and communicate data, information, knowledge, and wisdom in
support of practice and decision-making.

Original educational practice resource • 2026–2027

, WGU D220 | OBJECTIVE ASSESSMENT REVIEW
Why the other options are incorrect: A describes IT support; C overstates automation and removes
clinical judgment; D is an administrative billing function.

Exam tip: Technology should support nursing judgment, not replace it.



Question 2. DIKW
A nurse sees a patient’s temperature is 39.1°C and notes chills and tachycardia. Which action best
reflects applying knowledge to the situation?

A. Record the number without interpretation
B. Recognize the pattern and assess for possible infection while following escalation protocols
C. Assume the patient has a confirmed bacterial infection
D. Delete the value because it is abnormal
Correct answer: B

Detailed rationale: Interpreting a measurement with symptoms and other findings supports clinical
reasoning and appropriate assessment/escalation. The data alone do not establish a specific
cause.

Why the other options are incorrect: A leaves data uninterpreted; C makes an unsupported
diagnosis; D removes important information.

Exam tip: Use the full clinical picture and verify unexpected measurements.



Question 3. Data quality
A dashboard reports fewer medication errors after a new workflow. What should the quality team verify
before concluding the workflow caused improvement?

A. Whether reporting definitions, denominator, and data capture remained consistent
B. Whether the dashboard uses large fonts
C. Whether all older data can be removed
D. Whether the change was popular with one staff member
Correct answer: A

Detailed rationale: Valid comparisons require consistent definitions, data completeness,
denominators, and collection methods. A change in reporting can create an apparent improvement
without changing actual safety.


Original educational practice resource • 2026–2027

Documentinformatie

Geüpload op
13 oktober 2026
Aantal pagina's
26
Geschreven in
2026/2027
Type
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)
Bevat
Vragen en antwoorden
€11,45

Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen Binnen 14 dagen na aankoop en voor het downloaden kun je een ander document kiezen. Je kunt het bedrag gewoon opnieuw besteden.
Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn
Direct beschikbaar na je betaling
Online lezen of als PDF

Seller avatar
De reputatie van een verkoper is gebaseerd op het aantal documenten dat iemand tegen betaling verkocht heeft en de beoordelingen die voor die items ontvangen zijn. Er zijn drie niveau’s te onderscheiden: brons, zilver en goud. Hoe beter de reputatie, hoe meer de kwaliteit van zijn of haar werk te vertrouwen is.
trevorwilly
3,0
(2)
Verkocht
11
Volgers
0
Items
2170
Laatst verkocht
2 maanden geleden

Echte notities, van echte studenten
Elk document op Stuvia is geschreven door een medestudent die hetzelfde vak deed. Zo leer je van iemand die het al heeft gehaald.



Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo makkelijk kan het dus zijn.”

Alisha Student

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Maak nauwkeurige citaten in APA, MLA en Harvard met onze gratis bronnengenerator.

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Veelgestelde vragen