Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Online lezen of als PDF Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Document preview thumbnail
Voorbeeld 4 van de 74 pagina's
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)

WGU D685: Practical Applications of Prompt Engineering — Comprehensive Objective Assessment With 200 Exam-Style Questions, Detailed Answer Keys, and In-Depth Rationales Covering Foundations, Advanced Prompt Crafting, AI Capabilities and Limitations,

Document preview thumbnail
Voorbeeld 4 van de 74 pagina's

WGU D685: Practical Applications of Prompt Engineering — Comprehensive Objective Assessment With 200 Exam-Style Questions, Detailed Answer Keys, and In-Depth Rationales Covering Foundations, Advanced Prompt Crafting, AI Capabilities and Limitations, Ethical AI and Bias Mitigation, Legal and Regulatory Compliance, and Evaluation, Iteration, and Performance Optimization GRADED A+

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

WGU D685 EXAM


WGU D685: Practical Applications of Prompt
Engineering — Comprehensive Objective Assessment
With 200 Exam-Style Questions, Detailed Answer
Keys, and In-Depth Rationales Covering Foundations,
Advanced Prompt Crafting, AI Capabilities and
Limitations, Ethical AI and Bias Mitigation, Legal and
Regulatory Compliance, and Evaluation, Iteration,
and Performance Optimization GRADED A+
================================================================================

WGU D685: PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS OF PROMPT ENGINEERING

COMPREHENSIVE OBJECTIVE ASSESSMENT — 200 QUESTIONS

WITH COMPLETE ANSWER KEYS AND RATIONALES

================================================================================



COURSE CODE ............ WGU D685

EXAM TITLE ............. Comprehensive Objective Assessment

VERSION ................ 2026/2027 Edition

TOTAL ITEMS ............ 200

QUESTION TYPES ......... Multiple-Choice, Select-All-That-Apply,

True/False, Case Study, Scenario-Based

RECOMMENDED TIME ....... 3–4 Hours

RECOMMENDED PASS MARK .. 80% (160/200)



================================================================================

SECTION MAP

================================================================================

SECTION I ............ Foundations of Prompt Engineering (Q1–Q35)

SECTION II ............ Advanced Prompt Crafting & Optimization (Q36–Q70)

SECTION III ............ AI Capabilities, Limitations & Hallucination



pg. 1

, WGU D685 EXAM

Management (Q71–Q105)

SECTION IV ............ Ethical AI, Bias Detection & Responsible Prompt

Design (Q106–Q140)

SECTION V ............ Legal & Regulatory Compliance (Q141–Q170)

SECTION VI ............ Evaluation, Iteration & Performance

Optimization (Q171–Q200)



================================================================================

COLOR-CODED FORMAT KEY

================================================================================

[BLUE] QUESTION heading and question section

[RED] ANSWER heading and answer section

[PURPLE] RATIONALE heading and rationale section



================================================================================

EXAM INSTRUCTIONS

================================================================================

1. Read each question carefully before selecting your answer.

2. For multiple-choice items, choose the single best answer.

3. For select-all-that-apply items, choose ALL correct options.

4. Review the Answer and Rationale for every question.

5. Do not skip any question — all 200 items include explanations.

6. Correct answer positions are randomized throughout the exam.



================================================================================

BEGIN EXAM

================================================================================




pg. 2

, WGU D685 EXAM

WGU D685: Practical Applications of Prompt Engineering

Comprehensive Objective Assessment – 200 Questions



Exam Instructions: This examination contains 200 questions covering foundational prompt
engineering principles, advanced prompt crafting techniques, AI model capabilities and limitations,
ethical AI and bias mitigation, legal and regulatory compliance, evaluation and iteration of prompt
performance, and scenario-based problem solving. Select the best answer for each question. Each
question includes a complete answer and rationale.



SECTION I: FOUNDATIONS OF PROMPT ENGINEERING

Questions 1–35



QUESTION 1:
What is the primary goal of prompt engineering in generative AI?

A. To write longer prompts with more details
B. To maximize the likelihood of a desired model output
C. To reduce the number of model parameters
D. To train the model from scratch using custom datasets

ANSWER:
B. To maximize the likelihood of a desired model output

RATIONALE:
Prompt engineering focuses on designing inputs that guide a generative AI model to produce
accurate, relevant, and useful outputs without modifying the model's weights or architecture. The
goal is to elicit the best possible response through careful input design, not to alter the underlying
model. Option A is incorrect because longer prompts are not inherently better. Option C is incorrect
because prompt engineering does not modify model parameters. Option D is incorrect because
training models from scratch is a separate process entirely.



QUESTION 2:
Which of the following is an example of a zero-shot prompt?

A. "Translate 'Hello' to Spanish." (without providing examples)
B. "Here is an example: 'Cat → Gato'. Now translate 'Dog'."
C. "Classify this sentiment as positive or negative after reading 5 examples."
D. "Generate a story based on the following three examples of fairy tales."

ANSWER:
A. "Translate 'Hello' to Spanish." (without providing examples)

RATIONALE:
Zero-shot prompting means the model receives no examples of the task and must rely solely on its



pg. 3

, WGU D685 EXAM

pre-trained knowledge to generate a response. Options B, C, and D all provide examples to the
model, which makes them few-shot prompts rather than zero-shot prompts.



QUESTION 3:
What is the core problem with the prompt: "Where should I eat dinner?"

A. The AI lacks sufficient training data on restaurants
B. The prompt lacks location, cuisine preference, and budget constraints
C. The AI does not understand the concept of dinner
D. The prompt is too long and complex

ANSWER:
B. The prompt lacks location, cuisine preference, and budget constraints

RATIONALE:
This prompt is too vague and lacks essential context that would help the AI provide a useful
response. Without location, cuisine preferences, budget, or other constraints, the AI cannot provide
a relevant recommendation. The AI has sufficient training data on restaurants, understands the
concept of dinner, and the prompt is actually too short and underspecified rather than too long.



QUESTION 4:
Which technique best improves multi-step reasoning in large language models?

A. Role prompting
B. Chain-of-thought (CoT) prompting
C. Length penalty adjustment
D. Temperature adjustment

ANSWER:
B. Chain-of-thought (CoT) prompting

RATIONALE:
Chain-of-thought prompting encourages the model to show intermediate reasoning steps, improving
accuracy for math, logic, and complex reasoning tasks by 40-100% according to research. Role
prompting assigns a persona but does not specifically improve multi-step reasoning. Length penalty
and temperature adjustments affect output length and randomness respectively, but do not directly
enhance reasoning capabilities.



QUESTION 5:
What does the "temperature" parameter control in LLM generation?

A. Length of output
B. Randomness or creativity of outputs
C. Grammar correctness
D. Training data size




pg. 4

Documentinformatie

Geüpload op
16 september 2026
Aantal pagina's
74
Geschreven in
2026/2027
Type
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)
Bevat
Vragen en antwoorden
€16,84

Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen Binnen 14 dagen na aankoop en voor het downloaden kun je een ander document kiezen. Je kunt het bedrag gewoon opnieuw besteden.
Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn
Direct beschikbaar na je betaling
Online lezen of als PDF

Verkocht
2
Volgers
1
Items
192
Laatst verkocht
1 week geleden

Echte notities, van echte studenten
Elk document op Stuvia is geschreven door een medestudent die hetzelfde vak deed. Zo leer je van iemand die het al heeft gehaald.



Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo makkelijk kan het dus zijn.”

Alisha Student

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Maak nauwkeurige citaten in APA, MLA en Harvard met onze gratis bronnengenerator.

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Veelgestelde vragen