100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Lees online óf als PDF Geen vaste maandelijkse kosten 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Samenvatting

Summary SV Investment Analysis and Portfolio Management Part 2 - Ugent

Beoordeling
-
Verkocht
-
Pagina's
88
Geüpload op
11-12-2025
Geschreven in
2025/2026

De samenvatting omvat deel 2 van de te kennen leerstof voor het examen Investment Analysis and Portfolio Management aan Ugent (Master Handelswetenschappen - Finance and Risk Management). Zowel de slides, lesnotities en het boek zijn verwerkt in de samenvatting. Bovendien bevat de samenvatting alle voorbeelden/MCQ's die in de les besproken werden, alsook het gastcollege. Veel succes!

Meer zien Lees minder











Oeps! We kunnen je document nu niet laden. Probeer het nog eens of neem contact op met support.

Documentinformatie

Geüpload op
11 december 2025
Aantal pagina's
88
Geschreven in
2025/2026
Type
Samenvatting

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

Topic 6: Market Efficiency and Behavioral Finance
Review of Previous Topics
- Previous chapters: Determining or modelling expected rates of return
o Average of historical returns
o Scenario analysis
o Index models
o Equilibrium models (CAPM)
§ Different from other models, because it is a theoretical model that states that expected return is
a function of risk
§ Explains how expected return is linked to risk
o Valuation models (Next Part)
- Equilibrium models (CAPM) imply that you get “value for money”: expected return as compensation for risk
o Other methods not necessarily

Market Efficiency
Efficient market
- Price you pay for an asset equals the fair value à Pt = Vt
o Implication: Y = 0 à E(r) = k = rf + Z[E(rm) + rf]
- Investors behave rationally

Inefficient market
- Pt ≠ Vt
- Examples: IT bubble, price of IT stocks was much higher than fair value of those companies
o Everyone bought IT stocks, resulting in increasing prices
- Investors do not act in a rational way
- Implication: Y ≠ 0
o Y < 0 à stocks are overpriced (cf. IT stocks)
o Y > 0 à stocks are underpriced, interesting investment opportunity

Active versus passive management
Assumption: equilibrium models (CAPM) hold
- Result: optimal risky portfolio = market portfolio, all investors invest in this market portfolio, there should thus
be only 1 fund that has the market portfolio, and active management is not useful
- Passive management is appropriate
o CAPM: all Y = 0 à all stocks are correctly priced à by investing in individual assets, it’s not possible to
make an additional profit
- Investment strategy: market index fund (no analysis needed)

Active management: Can you do better?
- Asset allocation: optimal portfolio selection based on asset classes
o Use method to determine input parameters
- Security selection: optimal portfolio selection based on individual assets
o Use valuation methods
- Yp = Y of the portfolio = weighted average of Y’s of individual assets

Better than what?
- Active management should lead to higher returns (abnormal returns)
o Actual return > return as compensation for market risk (positive ex-post Y)
o Return higher than benchmark return (mostly the market)
- How outperform the market?
o Your information must be better than the market

100

, o You should have access to information that isn’t available in the market
o P: Value of stock reflected by the market
§ Price that all investors in the market believe is the correct price
§ Decided by demand and supply
o V: Value of the stock based on your own information
o P = V à You would expect that your information is already reflected in the market
o Suppose at time t: Pt = 100 and Vt = 110 à P ≠ V (not possible in an efficient market)
§ Perhaps you know that the company will do a profitable investment, and only you and the CEO
have access to this information à inefficient market
§ Y = +10%
- If you can’t outperform the market, it doesn’t make sense to manage actively

What is reflected by the market?
- Market efficiency concepts

Efficient Capital Markets
- In an efficient capital market:
o Security prices adjust rapidly to the arrival of new information
o Current prices reflect all information about the security
o Implication: Stock prices should follow a random walk
§ Stock price changes are random and unpredictable
§ Random walk: Pt = Pt-1 + et where ei reflects new information
• New information is random
• In efficient markets, this new information is reflected in the price immediately
§ Reason: At the time that there is new information, everyone (rational investors) will start
buying/selling and the price adjusts immediately, thus by the time you want to buy/sell, the
price is already adjusted
o Result: price changes are not predictable, because price changes are a function of new information
which is unpredictable
§ ∆Pt = Pt – Pt-1 = et




- Example: Suppose model predicts that XYZ stock price, currently $100, will rise dramatically in three days to
$110
o What will all investors with access to the model’s prediction do today? à buy à price increases
immediately
- Whether markets are efficient has been extensively researched and remains controversial

Efficient market hypothesis: EHM
- Stocks already reflect all available information

Why does it matter?
- If prices do fully reflect all current information, it would not be worth an investor’s time to use information to
find undervalued securities
o Y = 0, P = V
- If prices do NOT fully reflect information
o Find and use that information, and perhaps you will be able to beat the market
101

, o Y≠0 à Y of individual asset is not 0 à Y of portfolio is also not 0
o P≠V

Example 1: Cumulative Abnormal Returns Surrounding Takeover
Attempts
- Impact on company that will be taken over
o From literature it’s known that the value of the
company will increase
- Result: when it is known that the company will be taken over,
you will buy, because you expect price to increase

Do markets seem efficient? Do markets reflect the information?
- t = 0: announcement about takeover
o Everyone has access to this information
o On day of announcement cum. abnormal return
increases substantially
- After t = 0: cum. abnormal return is flat, there is no impact of
the announcement anymore the day after à information is
immediately reflected in the price
- Days before the announcement, cum. abnormal returns are
already positive
o Indicates that markets are not fully efficient, because
effect is not only on time t = 0
o Reason: some people have information about potential
takeover (inside information)
Example 2: Returns Following CNBC report announcements
- At t = 0 information has been made public
- Graph looks at minutes relative to the announcement

Do markets seem efficient? Do markets reflect the information?
- On the same minute that announcement has been made, the
markets adjust
o Indication of highly efficient markets
- Positive information: only a reaction in the minute of the
announcement, not later
- Negative information: also a reaction a few minutes later
o Takes a bit more time to reflect information in the price
Example 3: Market response to Covid-19 vaccine announcement by
Pfizer on November 9
- Impact of announcement made by Pfizer during covid-19 crisis
that they made a vaccine
- Very positive news

Do markets seem efficient? Do markets reflect the information?
- Prices go up immediately at the time of the announcement
- Hours after announcement, there is almost no more impact
- Strong indication of efficient market

Investing and Market Efficiency: Would stock selection amount to throwing darts at a wall in an efficient market?
- Hardly! Risk still matters à We would still want to research the risk-return properties of securities
- It’s not because markets are efficient that you can select stocks at random
- You still need to take into account risk
102

, Why Should Capital Markets Be Efficient?
What would be ingredients of “informationally” efficient market?
3 conditions:
- Competition: Large number of profit-maximizing participants analyze and value securities
o Looking for information which might be overlooked by the rest of the investment company
- New information regarding securities comes to the market in a random fashion
o New information is not predictable, thus prices neither
- Profit-maximizing investors adjust security prices rapidly to reflect the effect of this new information

Under these 3 conditions, a security’s price would be appropriate for its level of risk
- Degree of efficiency differs across markets
o Emerging markets might be less efficient than e.g. US markets
§ Reason: less competition à Less investors are following these markets and invest in these
markets
o Prices of small stocks might reflect information less well than prices of large stocks
§ Reason: less competition à Less investors are following these stocks and invest in these stocks
- Inside information
o Illegal

Alternative Efficient Market Hypotheses
Pt ~ f(info)
- Market info (prices, returns, volume, …) included in price of the market à Weak-form EMH
- Public information included in price of the market à Semi strong-form EMH
- Public and private information included in price of the market à Strong-form EMH
o Private information is not available to everyone

Various forms of efficient market hypothesis (EHM):
- Weak-form EMH
- Semi strong-form EMH
- Strong-form EMH

Differences
- Hypotheses differ in terms of the information that security prices should reflect

Weak-form EMH
Pt ~ f(market info)
- Current stock prices already fully reflect all information contained in the history of past trading
- Information: History of past prices, returns and trading volume
- Reason: Past stock price data are publicly available and virtually costless to obtain
- Implication: Past returns and other market data should have no relationship with future returns
o It’s not possible to make predictions about future prices and returns, based on past prices and returns
o Rt = Y + Zrt-1 + ut à ^Z would be insignificant, impossible to predict future with past
- Future returns are unpredictable, based on past returns

EMU Stock Returns
- Technical analysis: looking for pattern in the prices
o Shouldn’t be possible according to weak-form EMH
- Return of European stock market randomly fluctuates
o Result: it would be very difficult to find a pattern to
predict the future
o The random pattern reflects the random
information

103

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
De reputatie van een verkoper is gebaseerd op het aantal documenten dat iemand tegen betaling verkocht heeft en de beoordelingen die voor die items ontvangen zijn. Er zijn drie niveau’s te onderscheiden: brons, zilver en goud. Hoe beter de reputatie, hoe meer de kwaliteit van zijn of haar werk te vertrouwen is.
Fc23 Universiteit Gent
Bekijk profiel
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
73
Lid sinds
1 jaar
Aantal volgers
1
Documenten
20
Laatst verkocht
3 uur geleden

4,8

4 beoordelingen

5
3
4
1
3
0
2
0
1
0

Recent door jou bekeken

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via Bancontact, iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo eenvoudig kan het zijn.”

Alisha Student

Veelgestelde vragen