Vennootschappen en rechtspersonen week
1, 4 t/m 14 (Personenvennootschappen)
Universiteit van Amsterdam
Master Privaatrecht
,Inhoud
1 Week 1......................................................................................................7
1.1 Kraakman c.s., The Anatomy of Corporate Law, 3rd. ed. Oxford -
Oxford University Press 2017 - Chapter 1.................................................7
1.2 Van de BV en de NV 2022/1 t/m 12a en Europees
vennootschapsrecht................................................................................14
1.3 Kroniek van het ondernemingsrecht (NJB 2025/1097)......................24
1.4 Op naar de ‘Innovative European Company’....................................32
2 Week 4....................................................................................................36
2.1 Van Schilfgaarde c.s. (18e dr., 2022) H. II, H. V nrs. 42-46, H. VII nrs.
62-64, 67, H. VIII nrs. 68-71, H IX nrs. 73-74 en 78-80...........................36
2.2 Asser/Rensen 2-III (2022) nrs. 1 t/m 4, 9 t/m 12, 238-248................55
2.3 Jurisprudentie....................................................................................67
2.3.1 HR 21 januari 1955, NJ 1959/43 (Forumbank)............................67
2.3.2 HR 13 juli 2007, NJ 2007/434 (ABN AMRO LaSalle).....................68
2.3.3 HR 4 april 2014, NJ 2014/286 (Cancun)......................................69
2.3.4 HR 18 april 2014, JOR 2014/227 (Vereniging Martijn).................70
2.3.5 HR 20 april 2018, NJ 2018/331 (Boskalis/Fugro).........................73
2.3.6 HR 24 april 2020, JOR 2020/226 (Bandidos)...............................75
2.3.7 HR 10 februari 2023, NJ 2023/166 (Cordial)...............................76
3 Week 5....................................................................................................80
3.1 Van Schilfgaarde c.s. (18e dr, 2020), H. VI en H. X...........................80
3.2 Asser 2-IIb (2025) nrs. 200-212........................................................88
3.3 Jurisprudentie....................................................................................92
3.3.1 HR 17 december 1982, NJ 1983/480 (Bibolini)...........................92
3.3.2 HR 1 maart 2002, NJ 2002/296, m.nt. Maeijer; JOR 2002/79, m.nt.
Van den Ingh (Zwagerman Beheer).....................................................93
3.3.3 HR 29 juni 2007, NJ 2007/420 (Bruil/Kombex) (alleen
samenvatting)......................................................................................94
3.3.4 HR 20 april 2018, NJ 2018/331 (Boskalis/Fugro).........................97
3.3.5 Hof Amsterdam (OK) 26 mei 1983, JOR 2022/56 (Linders/Hofstee)
.............................................................................................................99
3.3.6 Rb. Den Haag 1 augustus 2012, JOR 2012/286 (Vanka-Kawat)...99
4 Week 6..................................................................................................101
, 4.1 Van Schilfgaarde c.s. (18e dr., 2022), H. III nrs. 19, 26-29, en H. XI,
m.u.v. nrs. 103, 105, 109-110...............................................................101
4.2 Asser 2-IIa (2024), nrs. 204-214.....................................................113
4.3 B. Bier, De vennootschap met beperkte winstuitkering,
Ondernemingsrecht 2025/49................................................................122
4.4 Jurisprudentie..................................................................................129
4.4.1 HR 8 november 1991, JOR 2023/89 (Nimox).............................129
5 Week 7..................................................................................................131
5.1 M.J. van Uchelen-Schipper, hoofdstuk 8, ‘Rechtsvormen’...............131
5.2 Asser/Rensen 2-III (2022), 328-329, 332-334.................................139
5.3 O. Tromp, ‘Steward ownership in de polder Over de noodzaak van
een specifieke rechtsvorm voor Nederlandse steward owned
ondernemingen, WPNR 2024/7482.......................................................145
5.4 Jurisprudentie..................................................................................152
5.4.1 Hof Amsterdam 20 juni 2023, ECLI:NL:GHAMS:2023:1395
(mondkapjes).....................................................................................152
6 Week 8..................................................................................................154
6.1 Van Schilfgaarde c.s. (18e dr., 2022), H. III, nrs. 30-31, H. 4 nrs. 32-35
en 39-41................................................................................................154
6.2 Asser 2-IIb (2025) nrs. 454, 455, 475, 478, 492-493, 529-531, 555,
556........................................................................................................170
6.3 Jurisprudentie..................................................................................181
6.3.1 HR 31 december 1993, NJ 1994/436 (Verenigde Bootlieden). . .181
6.3.2 HR 10 maart 1995, NJ 1995/595 (Janssen Pers II).....................181
6.3.3 HR 18 april 2003, NJ 2003/286 (Rodamco North America) (zonder
conclusie AG).....................................................................................182
6.3.4 Hof Amsterdam (OK) 8 maart 2001, NJ 2001/224 (Gucci III).....184
7 Week 9..................................................................................................186
7.1 Van de BV en de NV 18e druk (2022)..............................................186
7.2 Asser 2-IIb (2025) nr. 131 en 137...................................................198
7.3 Bartman en Olaerts, Van het concern, 11e dr., 2025 H. 3 en H. 6. .202
7.4 Jurisprudentie..................................................................................212
7.4.1 HR 10 januari 1990, NJ 1990/466 (Ogem II m.b.t. zorgplicht)...212
7.4.2 HR 4 april 2014, NJ 2014/286 (Cancun) (zie ook week 4).........213
, 7.4.3 HR 21 januari 1955, NJ 1959/43 (Forumbank) (zie ook week 4)
...........................................................................................................215
7.4.4 Hof Den Haag 12 november 2024, ECLI:NL:GHDHA:2024:2099,
JOR 2025, 81 (Milieudefensie/Shell-klimaatzaak)...............................216
8 Week 10................................................................................................218
8.1 Van Schilfgaarde H. IX, nrs. 77-83, 86-87, H. 13 en 14...................218
8.2 Bartman/Olaerts, Van het concern, H. 7..........................................227
8.3 Jurisprudentie..................................................................................234
8.3.1 HR 7 februari 1992, NJ 1992/438 (Astro)..................................234
8.3.2 HR 14 september 2007, NJ 2007/612 (Versatel III)...................234
8.3.3 HR 18 december 2015 JOR 2016/145 (Hoeksema/RM Trade)
(alleen samenvatting)........................................................................234
8.3.4 Rb. Amsterdam 10 augustus 2017, JOR 2017/260 (AkzoNobel)
...........................................................................................................235
8.3.5 Hof Amsterdam (OK) 29 mei 2017, JOR 2017/261 (AkzoNobel) 236
9 Week 11................................................................................................237
9.1 Van Schilfgaarde c.s. (18e dr., 2022), H. XII....................................237
9.2 Jurisprudentie..................................................................................250
9.2.1 HR 10 januari 1990, NJ 1990/466 (Ogem II)..............................250
9.2.2 HR 13 juli 2007, NJ 2007/434 (ABN AMRO LaSalle)...................250
9.2.3 HR 25 februari 2011, NJ 2011/335 (Inter Access).....................251
9.2.4 HR 29 maart 2013, NJ 2013/304 (Chinese Workers).................251
9.2.5 HR 11 april 2014, NJ 2014/296 (Enquête Slotervaartziekenhuis)
...........................................................................................................252
9.2.6 Hof Amsterdam (OK) 3 september 2019, JOR 2020/59 (Arnold
Maassen Holding)..............................................................................253
9.2.7 HR 3 april 2020, JOR 2020/166 (SNS Concernenquête)............254
9.2.8 HR 22 september 2023, ECLI:NL:HR:2023:1283, NJ 2024/22
(Funda)..............................................................................................255
9.2.9 Gerechtshof Amsterdam (OK) 17 september 2024,
ECLI:NL:GHAMS:2024:2660, JOR 2025/31 (Centric II)........................256
10 Week 12..............................................................................................257
10.1 Van Schilfgaarde c.s. (18e dr., 2022), H. I, H. V, nrs. 47-49, H. 8 nr.
72 en H. XI............................................................................................257
10.2 Jurisprudentie................................................................................271
1, 4 t/m 14 (Personenvennootschappen)
Universiteit van Amsterdam
Master Privaatrecht
,Inhoud
1 Week 1......................................................................................................7
1.1 Kraakman c.s., The Anatomy of Corporate Law, 3rd. ed. Oxford -
Oxford University Press 2017 - Chapter 1.................................................7
1.2 Van de BV en de NV 2022/1 t/m 12a en Europees
vennootschapsrecht................................................................................14
1.3 Kroniek van het ondernemingsrecht (NJB 2025/1097)......................24
1.4 Op naar de ‘Innovative European Company’....................................32
2 Week 4....................................................................................................36
2.1 Van Schilfgaarde c.s. (18e dr., 2022) H. II, H. V nrs. 42-46, H. VII nrs.
62-64, 67, H. VIII nrs. 68-71, H IX nrs. 73-74 en 78-80...........................36
2.2 Asser/Rensen 2-III (2022) nrs. 1 t/m 4, 9 t/m 12, 238-248................55
2.3 Jurisprudentie....................................................................................67
2.3.1 HR 21 januari 1955, NJ 1959/43 (Forumbank)............................67
2.3.2 HR 13 juli 2007, NJ 2007/434 (ABN AMRO LaSalle).....................68
2.3.3 HR 4 april 2014, NJ 2014/286 (Cancun)......................................69
2.3.4 HR 18 april 2014, JOR 2014/227 (Vereniging Martijn).................70
2.3.5 HR 20 april 2018, NJ 2018/331 (Boskalis/Fugro).........................73
2.3.6 HR 24 april 2020, JOR 2020/226 (Bandidos)...............................75
2.3.7 HR 10 februari 2023, NJ 2023/166 (Cordial)...............................76
3 Week 5....................................................................................................80
3.1 Van Schilfgaarde c.s. (18e dr, 2020), H. VI en H. X...........................80
3.2 Asser 2-IIb (2025) nrs. 200-212........................................................88
3.3 Jurisprudentie....................................................................................92
3.3.1 HR 17 december 1982, NJ 1983/480 (Bibolini)...........................92
3.3.2 HR 1 maart 2002, NJ 2002/296, m.nt. Maeijer; JOR 2002/79, m.nt.
Van den Ingh (Zwagerman Beheer).....................................................93
3.3.3 HR 29 juni 2007, NJ 2007/420 (Bruil/Kombex) (alleen
samenvatting)......................................................................................94
3.3.4 HR 20 april 2018, NJ 2018/331 (Boskalis/Fugro).........................97
3.3.5 Hof Amsterdam (OK) 26 mei 1983, JOR 2022/56 (Linders/Hofstee)
.............................................................................................................99
3.3.6 Rb. Den Haag 1 augustus 2012, JOR 2012/286 (Vanka-Kawat)...99
4 Week 6..................................................................................................101
, 4.1 Van Schilfgaarde c.s. (18e dr., 2022), H. III nrs. 19, 26-29, en H. XI,
m.u.v. nrs. 103, 105, 109-110...............................................................101
4.2 Asser 2-IIa (2024), nrs. 204-214.....................................................113
4.3 B. Bier, De vennootschap met beperkte winstuitkering,
Ondernemingsrecht 2025/49................................................................122
4.4 Jurisprudentie..................................................................................129
4.4.1 HR 8 november 1991, JOR 2023/89 (Nimox).............................129
5 Week 7..................................................................................................131
5.1 M.J. van Uchelen-Schipper, hoofdstuk 8, ‘Rechtsvormen’...............131
5.2 Asser/Rensen 2-III (2022), 328-329, 332-334.................................139
5.3 O. Tromp, ‘Steward ownership in de polder Over de noodzaak van
een specifieke rechtsvorm voor Nederlandse steward owned
ondernemingen, WPNR 2024/7482.......................................................145
5.4 Jurisprudentie..................................................................................152
5.4.1 Hof Amsterdam 20 juni 2023, ECLI:NL:GHAMS:2023:1395
(mondkapjes).....................................................................................152
6 Week 8..................................................................................................154
6.1 Van Schilfgaarde c.s. (18e dr., 2022), H. III, nrs. 30-31, H. 4 nrs. 32-35
en 39-41................................................................................................154
6.2 Asser 2-IIb (2025) nrs. 454, 455, 475, 478, 492-493, 529-531, 555,
556........................................................................................................170
6.3 Jurisprudentie..................................................................................181
6.3.1 HR 31 december 1993, NJ 1994/436 (Verenigde Bootlieden). . .181
6.3.2 HR 10 maart 1995, NJ 1995/595 (Janssen Pers II).....................181
6.3.3 HR 18 april 2003, NJ 2003/286 (Rodamco North America) (zonder
conclusie AG).....................................................................................182
6.3.4 Hof Amsterdam (OK) 8 maart 2001, NJ 2001/224 (Gucci III).....184
7 Week 9..................................................................................................186
7.1 Van de BV en de NV 18e druk (2022)..............................................186
7.2 Asser 2-IIb (2025) nr. 131 en 137...................................................198
7.3 Bartman en Olaerts, Van het concern, 11e dr., 2025 H. 3 en H. 6. .202
7.4 Jurisprudentie..................................................................................212
7.4.1 HR 10 januari 1990, NJ 1990/466 (Ogem II m.b.t. zorgplicht)...212
7.4.2 HR 4 april 2014, NJ 2014/286 (Cancun) (zie ook week 4).........213
, 7.4.3 HR 21 januari 1955, NJ 1959/43 (Forumbank) (zie ook week 4)
...........................................................................................................215
7.4.4 Hof Den Haag 12 november 2024, ECLI:NL:GHDHA:2024:2099,
JOR 2025, 81 (Milieudefensie/Shell-klimaatzaak)...............................216
8 Week 10................................................................................................218
8.1 Van Schilfgaarde H. IX, nrs. 77-83, 86-87, H. 13 en 14...................218
8.2 Bartman/Olaerts, Van het concern, H. 7..........................................227
8.3 Jurisprudentie..................................................................................234
8.3.1 HR 7 februari 1992, NJ 1992/438 (Astro)..................................234
8.3.2 HR 14 september 2007, NJ 2007/612 (Versatel III)...................234
8.3.3 HR 18 december 2015 JOR 2016/145 (Hoeksema/RM Trade)
(alleen samenvatting)........................................................................234
8.3.4 Rb. Amsterdam 10 augustus 2017, JOR 2017/260 (AkzoNobel)
...........................................................................................................235
8.3.5 Hof Amsterdam (OK) 29 mei 2017, JOR 2017/261 (AkzoNobel) 236
9 Week 11................................................................................................237
9.1 Van Schilfgaarde c.s. (18e dr., 2022), H. XII....................................237
9.2 Jurisprudentie..................................................................................250
9.2.1 HR 10 januari 1990, NJ 1990/466 (Ogem II)..............................250
9.2.2 HR 13 juli 2007, NJ 2007/434 (ABN AMRO LaSalle)...................250
9.2.3 HR 25 februari 2011, NJ 2011/335 (Inter Access).....................251
9.2.4 HR 29 maart 2013, NJ 2013/304 (Chinese Workers).................251
9.2.5 HR 11 april 2014, NJ 2014/296 (Enquête Slotervaartziekenhuis)
...........................................................................................................252
9.2.6 Hof Amsterdam (OK) 3 september 2019, JOR 2020/59 (Arnold
Maassen Holding)..............................................................................253
9.2.7 HR 3 april 2020, JOR 2020/166 (SNS Concernenquête)............254
9.2.8 HR 22 september 2023, ECLI:NL:HR:2023:1283, NJ 2024/22
(Funda)..............................................................................................255
9.2.9 Gerechtshof Amsterdam (OK) 17 september 2024,
ECLI:NL:GHAMS:2024:2660, JOR 2025/31 (Centric II)........................256
10 Week 12..............................................................................................257
10.1 Van Schilfgaarde c.s. (18e dr., 2022), H. I, H. V, nrs. 47-49, H. 8 nr.
72 en H. XI............................................................................................257
10.2 Jurisprudentie................................................................................271
