Escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron Inmediatamente disponible después del pago Leer en línea o como PDF ¿Documento equivocado? Cámbialo gratis 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Document preview thumbnail
Vista previa 4 fuera de 59 páginas
Examen

RMIN 5100S - Test 3 (Atkinson) Questions and Correct Answers | Latest Update 2026

Document preview thumbnail
Vista previa 4 fuera de 59 páginas

a full set of Test 3 for RMIN 5100S, including detailed explanations of liability concepts, tort law, CGL coverages, exclusions, limits, and applied scenario questions with correct answers. It covers all major exam topics such as negligence, strict liability, contractual liability, workers compensation, products and completed operations, and commercial general liability structure. The material is comprehensive and aligned with recent coursework, making it ideal for exam preparation and conceptual reinforcement.

Vista previa del contenido

RMIN 5100S - Test 3 (Atkinson) Questions and
Correct Answers | Latest Update 2026




Desk
- people with an organized desk tend to prefer property, while people with an
unorganized desk tend to like liability




Liability Risk

you are responsible for someone else or their stuff.




Legal Liability

- Criminal: crimes against society. Punishable by imprisonment and fines
- Civil: breach of duty owed to others. Punishable by money and injunctions.
- A single act can be both: 2008-09 Salmonella Outbreak. Major recall in 46
states of products that were contaminated with salmonella (especially Peanut
Butter paste). The company was continuing to sell the products even after bad
tests. The CEO was sentenced to 28 years in prison.




3 Bases for Legal Liability

,1. Tort
2. Legal Liability Based on Contracts

3. Legal Liability Based on Statutes




Tort
3 types of Tort:

1. Negligence

2. Intentional
3. Strict Liability




Negligence (a type of tort)

Is based on:
- a duty of care
- breach of duty
- injury or damage
There must be proximate cause (a connection between the breach of duty and
the injury/damage)

- This is by far the #1 reason why we have liabilities




Intentional (a type of tort)

,- 2 Types:
1. Act - intends to do the action, but no intent to harm (You run a red light and
hit a car).

2. Injury - Purpose is to cause harm (assault, battery, invasion)




Strict Liability (a type of tort)
- liability in the absence of Negligence and Intentional tort (aka Absolute
Liability)
- liability that is imposed even though the defendant acted neither negligently
or with the intent to cause harm

- also used to describe liability from statutes (Workers Comp., Dram Shop)
- examples include owning wild animals, blasting/explosive operations, and
dangerously defective products




Legal Liability Based on Contracts

Breach of Contract
- failure of a seller to fulfill its promise
- in the eyes of the law, the seller "warrants" that a product is fit for its intended
use
- if a product fails to function well, the buyer will likely want to their money
back (this is not covered by insurance).
- things get a bit more serious if the product's failure results in BI/PD (this is
covered by insurance)

, - Ex: a kid was able to open a child-proof container and drink Draino (the parents
can sue Draino and the latch-maker)



Hold Harmless and Indemnification Agreements

- assume legal liability for another's liability
- If Party A agrees to hold harmless and/or indemnify Party B, then Party A has
assumed a Contractual Liability
- these stipulate which company will be held legally responsible for costs of
lawsuits in the event that a component causes BI or PD
- Ex: car companies and supplying manufacturers. In 1993, Ford Explorers started
rolling over with Firestone tires, so Ford starting using different tires (led to big
rivalry)

- Hold harmless: "we won't sue each other"
- Indemnify: "if someone sues you, we will handle it"




Hold Harmless and Indemnification Agreements (Liability Based On Contracts)
- assume legal liability for another's liability
- If Party A agrees to hold harmless and/or indemnify Party B, then Party A has
assumed a Contractual Liability
- these stipulate which company will be held legally responsible for costs of
lawsuits in the event that a component causes BI or PD
- Ex: car companies and supplying manufacturers. In 1993, Ford Explorers started
rolling over with Firestone tires, so Ford starting using different tires (led to big
rivalry)
- Hold harmless: "we won't sue each other"

Información del documento

Subido en
6 de diciembre de 2025
Número de páginas
59
Escrito en
2025/2026
Tipo
Examen
Contiene
Preguntas y respuestas
$11.49

¿Documento equivocado? Cámbialo gratis Dentro de los 14 días posteriores a la compra y antes de descargarlo, puedes elegir otro documento. Puedes gastar el importe de nuevo.
Escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron
Inmediatamente disponible después del pago
Leer en línea o como PDF

Seller avatar
Los indicadores de reputación están sujetos a la cantidad de artículos vendidos por una tarifa y las reseñas que ha recibido por esos documentos. Hay tres niveles: Bronce, Plata y Oro. Cuanto mayor reputación, más podrás confiar en la calidad del trabajo del vendedor.
KelvinBrooks
4.3
(96)
Vendido
861
Seguidores
11
Artículos
5892
Última venta
9 horas hace



Por qué los estudiantes eligen Stuvia

Creado por compañeros estudiantes, verificado por reseñas

Calidad en la que puedes confiar: escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron y evaluado por otros que han usado estos resúmenes.

¿No estás satisfecho? Elige otro documento

¡No te preocupes! Puedes elegir directamente otro documento que se ajuste mejor a lo que buscas.

Paga como quieras, empieza a estudiar al instante

Sin suscripción, sin compromisos. Paga como estés acostumbrado con tarjeta de crédito y descarga tu documento PDF inmediatamente.

Student with book image

“Comprado, descargado y aprobado. Así de fácil puede ser.”

Alisha Student

Preguntas frecuentes