Escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron Inmediatamente disponible después del pago Leer en línea o como PDF ¿Documento equivocado? Cámbialo gratis 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Document preview thumbnail
Vista previa 3 fuera de 18 páginas
Examen

NUR 4000 Evidence-Based Nursing Practice Exam | 2025/2026 Verified A+ Correct Answers

Document preview thumbnail
Vista previa 3 fuera de 18 páginas

NUR 4000 Evidence-Based Nursing Practice Exam | 2025/2026 Verified A+ Correct Answers

Vista previa del contenido

NUR 4000 Evidence-Based
Nursing Practice Exam |
2025/2026 Verified A+
Correct Answers
Research Methodology (Questions 1-20)

1. Question: A nurse researcher is designing a study to explore the lived
experiences of patients with chronic pain. Which qualitative method best
aligns with this aim? Options:
o A. Phenomenology
o B. Randomized controlled trial
o C. Survey questionnaire
o D. Case-control study Answer: A. Phenomenology Explanation:
Phenomenology captures subjective experiences without
preconceptions, ideal for understanding pain's essence; Creswell &
Poth (2023) emphasize bracketing in interviews to ensure rigorous
data analysis.
2. Question: In a quantitative study examining the effect of a nursing
intervention on patient falls, the researcher selects a pre-test/post-test design.
What is the main limitation? Options:
o A. Lack of a control group
o B. Small sample size
o C. Qualitative bias
o D. Ethical concerns Answer: A. Lack of a control group
Explanation: Without controls, maturation or history threats
confound results; Polit & Beck (2024) recommend quasi-experimental
designs with comparisons for causal inference in clinical trials.
3. Question: A nurse is critiquing a study using convenience sampling for a
survey on nurse burnout. What is the primary threat to validity? Options:
o A. Sampling bias limiting generalizability
o B. High response rate
o C. Longitudinal data

, o D. Mixed methods Answer: A. Sampling bias limiting
generalizability Explanation: Convenience sampling selects
accessible participants, skewing representation; Grove & Gray (2023)
stress random sampling for external validity in population-based
research.
4. Question: A researcher aims to test a new wound care protocol's efficacy.
Which design allows for causality inference? Options:
o A. Experimental design
o B. Correlational study
o C. Descriptive survey
o D. Ethnographic observation Answer: A. Experimental design
Explanation: Randomization and control in experiments establish
cause-effect; JBI 2025 evidence hierarchy ranks RCTs highest for
intervention studies like wound care.
5. Question: In a mixed-methods study on nurse retention, the researcher
integrates qualitative interviews with quantitative surveys. What is the key
benefit? Options:
o A. Triangulation for robust findings
o B. Simplified data collection
o C. Reduced sample size
o D. Faster analysis Answer: A. Triangulation for robust findings
Explanation: Mixed methods converge data for validity; Creswell
(2023) highlights how qualitative explains quantitative trends,
enhancing transferability in nursing workforce research.
6. Question: A study reports a p-value of 0.03 for the association between shift
work and errors. What does this indicate? Options:
o A. Statistical significance at α = 0.05
o B. Clinical significance
o C. No association
o D. Type I error Answer: A. Statistical significance at α = 0.05
Explanation: p < 0.05 rejects the null hypothesis, indicating unlikely
chance findings; Polit & Beck (2024) caution interpreting with effect
size for practical relevance in error studies.
7. Question: A nurse researcher seeks to understand cultural influences on
pain management. Which sampling method is appropriate? Options:
o A. Purposive sampling
o B. Simple random
o C. Stratified

, o D. Cluster Answer: A. Purposive sampling Explanation: Purposive
selects information-rich cases for depth; Patton (2024) recommends it
for qualitative cultural studies to capture diverse perspectives.
8. Question: In a longitudinal study tracking hypertension outcomes, the
researcher faces high dropout rates. This threatens? Options:
o A. Internal validity due to attrition bias
o B. External validity
o C. Reliability
o D. Construct validity Answer: A. Internal validity due to attrition bias
Explanation: Attrition skews results if dropouts differ systematically;
Grove & Gray (2023) advocate intent-to-treat analysis to mitigate in
cohort designs.
9. Question: A study uses thematic analysis for interview data on end-of-life
care. What is the goal? Options:
o A. Identify patterns and meanings
o B. Quantify frequencies
o C. Test hypotheses
o D. Generalize population Answer: A. Identify patterns and meanings
Explanation: Braun & Clarke (2024) thematic analysis codes for
recurrent ideas; qualitative rigor ensures credibility in palliative care
research.
10.Question: A researcher calculates odds ratio (OR) in a case-control study on
smoking and lung cancer. OR >1 indicates? Options:
o A. Increased risk with exposure
o B. No association
o C. Protective effect
o D. Confounding Answer: A. Increased risk with exposure
Explanation: OR approximates relative risk; Rothman (2024) notes
OR=3.0 suggests 3x higher odds, guiding public health smoking
cessation policies.
11.Question: Ethical consideration in research with vulnerable populations
requires? Options:
o A. Informed consent with assent for minors
o B. Waiver of consent
o C. Deception
o D. Minimal risk only Answer: A. Informed consent with assent for
minors Explanation: Belmont Report (2023 update) mandates assent
alongside parental consent; protects autonomy in pediatric oncology
studies.

Información del documento

Subido en
31 de octubre de 2025
Número de páginas
18
Escrito en
2025/2026
Tipo
Examen
Contiene
Preguntas y respuestas
$15.99

¿Documento equivocado? Cámbialo gratis Dentro de los 14 días posteriores a la compra y antes de descargarlo, puedes elegir otro documento. Puedes gastar el importe de nuevo.
Escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron
Inmediatamente disponible después del pago
Leer en línea o como PDF

Seller avatar
Los indicadores de reputación están sujetos a la cantidad de artículos vendidos por una tarifa y las reseñas que ha recibido por esos documentos. Hay tres niveles: Bronce, Plata y Oro. Cuanto mayor reputación, más podrás confiar en la calidad del trabajo del vendedor.
STUVIAACTUALEXAMS
3.5
(161)
Vendido
1255
Seguidores
208
Artículos
9182
Última venta
16 horas hace



Por qué los estudiantes eligen Stuvia

Creado por compañeros estudiantes, verificado por reseñas

Calidad en la que puedes confiar: escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron y evaluado por otros que han usado estos resúmenes.

¿No estás satisfecho? Elige otro documento

¡No te preocupes! Puedes elegir directamente otro documento que se ajuste mejor a lo que buscas.

Paga como quieras, empieza a estudiar al instante

Sin suscripción, sin compromisos. Paga como estés acostumbrado con tarjeta de crédito y descarga tu documento PDF inmediatamente.

Student with book image

“Comprado, descargado y aprobado. Así de fácil puede ser.”

Alisha Student

Preguntas frecuentes