RCE2601
ASSIGNMENT 2 2025
UNIQUE NO.
DUE DATE: 13 JUNE 2025
, RCE2601: Assignment 2
Case Study 1: Evaluating Sources for a Literature Review
Task 1: Source Evaluation (40 Marks)
1. Prioritising Sources
When conducting a literature review on the influence of artificial intelligence (AI) in
higher education, it is crucial to prioritize sources that are credible, evidence-based, and
widely accepted in the academic community. Two such sources that should be heavily
relied upon are:
Peer-Reviewed Journal Articles
These are scholarly publications that have undergone a thorough evaluation by
experts in the relevant field before publication. The peer review process ensures
that the research methods, analysis, and conclusions are valid and meet rigorous
academic standards. As a result, these articles offer well-supported insights and
are highly reliable for academic writing. Sarah should prioritize these sources
because they provide in-depth analysis, theoretical frameworks, and empirical
data that are essential for building a strong literature review on the impact of AI in
higher education.
Government Reports
Publications issued by governmental bodies or public research agencies often
contain up-to-date data, policy analysis, and statistics relevant to national or
regional educational contexts. These reports are generally compiled by
professionals with subject-matter expertise and follow strict editorial guidelines.
While they may not always be as theoretically rich as academic journal articles,
they provide factual and policy-relevant information that can help contextualize
Sarah’s review within current educational trends and technological
implementations.
2. Justifying the Exclusion or Limited Use of Certain Sources
Not all information available online is suitable for academic research. Some sources,
while useful for background understanding, lack the reliability or scholarly value required
for a literature review. These include:
Wikipedia
Wikipedia is a publicly editable online encyclopedia. Although it is a useful
starting point for gaining a general understanding of a topic or identifying
keywords and key figures, its content can be altered by anyone and is not subject
to a formal review process. Because of this, the accuracy and stability of its
content cannot be guaranteed. Sarah may use Wikipedia to discover initial
concepts and vocabulary, but she should not rely on it as a source in her
literature review or cite it in her final work.
ASSIGNMENT 2 2025
UNIQUE NO.
DUE DATE: 13 JUNE 2025
, RCE2601: Assignment 2
Case Study 1: Evaluating Sources for a Literature Review
Task 1: Source Evaluation (40 Marks)
1. Prioritising Sources
When conducting a literature review on the influence of artificial intelligence (AI) in
higher education, it is crucial to prioritize sources that are credible, evidence-based, and
widely accepted in the academic community. Two such sources that should be heavily
relied upon are:
Peer-Reviewed Journal Articles
These are scholarly publications that have undergone a thorough evaluation by
experts in the relevant field before publication. The peer review process ensures
that the research methods, analysis, and conclusions are valid and meet rigorous
academic standards. As a result, these articles offer well-supported insights and
are highly reliable for academic writing. Sarah should prioritize these sources
because they provide in-depth analysis, theoretical frameworks, and empirical
data that are essential for building a strong literature review on the impact of AI in
higher education.
Government Reports
Publications issued by governmental bodies or public research agencies often
contain up-to-date data, policy analysis, and statistics relevant to national or
regional educational contexts. These reports are generally compiled by
professionals with subject-matter expertise and follow strict editorial guidelines.
While they may not always be as theoretically rich as academic journal articles,
they provide factual and policy-relevant information that can help contextualize
Sarah’s review within current educational trends and technological
implementations.
2. Justifying the Exclusion or Limited Use of Certain Sources
Not all information available online is suitable for academic research. Some sources,
while useful for background understanding, lack the reliability or scholarly value required
for a literature review. These include:
Wikipedia
Wikipedia is a publicly editable online encyclopedia. Although it is a useful
starting point for gaining a general understanding of a topic or identifying
keywords and key figures, its content can be altered by anyone and is not subject
to a formal review process. Because of this, the accuracy and stability of its
content cannot be guaranteed. Sarah may use Wikipedia to discover initial
concepts and vocabulary, but she should not rely on it as a source in her
literature review or cite it in her final work.
