• ¿Documento equivocado? Cámbialo gratis
  • Escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron
  • Inmediatamente disponible después del pago
  • Leer en línea o como PDF
Vender
¿Dónde estudias?
Tu idioma
Document preview thumbnail
Vista previa 3 fuera de 21 páginas
Examen

IRE 244 Midterm Exam Study Set

Document preview thumbnail
Vista previa 3 fuera de 21 páginas

IRE 244 Midterm Exam Study Set ...

Vista previa del contenido

IRE 244 Midterm Exam Study Set

What general minimum wage does the Ontario Employment Standard Act specify? -
ANSWER 40-50% of the average industrial wage

What is the coverage of Ontario's minimum wage? - ANSWER 5% of ON employees

3% of total hours worked

1.5% of total earnings

conservative freeze - ANSWER 1995-2002

Min wage not increased for 8 years

Harris gov't

liberal annual increase - ANSWER 2003-2007

$6.85 in 2003 - $8.00 in 2007

17% increase over 4 yrs determined yr by yr

McGuinty gov't

liberal predetermined increases - ANSWER 2007-2010

Anti-poverty groups campaigned that EE working full-time

year round would only earn $16,000/yr, below the "poverty line."

$8.00 - $10.25 by 2010

28% increase over 3 yrs

McGuinty gov't

liberal freeze - ANSWER 2011-2013

Global financial crisis froze min wage at $10.25 for 3 yrs

McGuinty gov't

liberal catch-up and keep-up - ANSWER 2014-2017

2014: 7% increase to catch-up for inflation during 3 yr freeze ($10.25-$11.00)

2015-17: annual min wage increase tied to CPI (inflation)

Wynne gov't

,liberal changing workplaces review - ANSWER 2017-2018

Planned increase to $15.00 over 3 yrs

$11.40-$11.60 2017 then $11.60-$14 2018 (21% increase)

Wynne gov't

conservative freeze #2 - ANSWER Cancelled increase to $15.00 in 2019

Plan to freeze wage at $14.00 until October 2020 (nearly 3 yrs)

Ford gov't

deindustrialization - ANSWER *increased demand for part-time work

shift away from manufacturing economy

70% of jobs are now in the service sector

women in the workforce stats - ANSWER share of women in the labour force increased
from 34% in 1970 60 48% in 2018

male lfpr (2018): 70%

female lfpr (2018): 61%

women in the workforce implications - ANSWER *-increased supply of part-time work

-growing importance of pay/employment equity

-sexual harassment/systemic discrimination

-daycare, job sharing, maternity leave, pensions

part-time work - ANSWER less than 30 hours per week @ MAIN job (formerly defined as
all jobs)

4% in 1950s - 20% in 2013

Low compensation (threat to full-timers)

Difficult to organize (unionize)

Bill 148 (Fair Workplaces, Better Jobs Act) - ANSWER 2017 liberals

requires part-time and temp agency employees to be compensated the same as full-time
employees for the same work

Bill 47 (making Ontario Open for Business Act) - ANSWER 2018 conservatives

repealed equal pay for part-time workers as of jan 2019

, non-standard work - ANSWER includes part-time and contingent work

1/3 of labour force

contingent work - ANSWER casual, term-contract, temp, and seasonal jobs

this work provides flexibility to fluctuations in demand

precarious employment - ANSWER -Canadian Center for Policy Alternatives report that
22% of -Canadians work in precarious situations (part-time, contract work, no sick days,
etc.)

-generation screwed: 44% of millennial face job precarity; half that reported related
depression or anxiety

-scarring effect (unemployment; loss of confidence)

-poor impact on health (millenials @ highest risk for mental health issues)

aging population implications - ANSWER baby boomers 1947-66, age 65 2012-2031

-concern w pensions and health care

-limited opportunity for promotion (lateral/spiral career paths)

-mandatory retirement hot topic

-future labour shortage?

mandatory retirement - ANSWER employer policy that forces employees to retire @ a
certain age, usually 65

never been law in Canada

ON Human Rights Code and mandatory retirement - ANSWER until 2006 OHRC had cap
on age discrimination (age was 18-64), thus allowing employers to have mandatory
retirement @ 65

liberals scrapped MR when elected

exception for bona fide occupational requirement

Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and mandatory retirement - ANSWER 1990
supreme court ruled that it is discriminatory, but passes "reasonableness test" allowed
to continue in Canada and individual provinces can decide whether or not to allow it

employment income (earnings) - ANSWER wages, salaries, self-employment income,
etc.

market income - ANSWER employment income + investment income

total income - ANSWER market income + transfers (gov't $ not in exchange for work)

Información del documento

Subido en
10 de mayo de 2025
Número de páginas
21
Escrito en
2024/2025
Tipo
Examen
Contiene
Preguntas y respuestas
$15.49

¿Documento equivocado? Cámbialo gratis Dentro de los 14 días posteriores a la compra y antes de descargarlo, puedes elegir otro documento. Puedes gastar el importe de nuevo.
Escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron
Inmediatamente disponible después del pago
Leer en línea o como PDF

Seller avatar
Los indicadores de reputación están sujetos a la cantidad de artículos vendidos por una tarifa y las reseñas que ha recibido por esos documentos. Hay tres niveles: Bronce, Plata y Oro. Cuanto mayor reputación, más podrás confiar en la calidad del trabajo del vendedor.
Evergreenview
4.8
(5)
Vendido
19
Seguidores
1
Artículos
3302
Última venta
2 semanas hace




Por qué los estudiantes eligen Stuvia

Creado por compañeros estudiantes, verificado por reseñas

Calidad en la que puedes confiar: escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron y evaluado por otros que han usado estos resúmenes.

¿No estás satisfecho? Elige otro documento

¡No te preocupes! Puedes elegir directamente otro documento que se ajuste mejor a lo que buscas.

Paga como quieras, empieza a estudiar al instante

Sin suscripción, sin compromisos. Paga como estés acostumbrado con tarjeta de crédito y descarga tu documento PDF inmediatamente.

Student with book image

“Comprado, descargado y aprobado. Así de fácil puede ser.”

Alisha Student

Preguntas frecuentes