100% de satisfacción garantizada Inmediatamente disponible después del pago Tanto en línea como en PDF No estas atado a nada 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Examen

A LEVEL POLITICS GLOBAL POLITICS ESSAY PLAN STUDY GUIDE 2025 GUARANTEED DISTINCTION.

Puntuación
-
Vendido
-
Páginas
17
Grado
A
Subido en
14-03-2025
Escrito en
2024/2025

A LEVEL POLITICS GLOBAL POLITICS ESSAY PLAN STUDY GUIDE 2025 GUARANTEED DISTINCTION. Tuto24 resources A Level Politics – Global Politics States and Globalisation Evaluate the extent to which globalisation has undermined state sovereignty (30 marks) Undermined Retained GLOBAL ECONOMY • Rose after collapse of BrettonWoodssystem in early 70s,shifted to deeply integrated economies instead of just interlinked national ones • National economies partially absorbed into global one • States now reliant on each otherso more susceptible to 昀椀nancial crash • Di昀케cult for states to run industrial policy, limiting sov NATIONALISM • Has widespread appeal and growing in popularity despite global interconnectedness • People have strong national loyalty, trend towards populism, protectionism and conservative nationalism in US and Europe e.g. UKIP got 13% of vote in 2015 general election in UK (3rd biggest party but only 1 MP) • Indicates states retain sov as people’s nation interests come before global community INTERNATIONAL LAW • Legal systems traditionally national as have legal sov so create and enforce own laws • Recent shift to international law and states are expected to follow it • Those that do gain higher level of respect and international credence • Those who don’t are punished through courts, sanctions, withdrawal of aid and invaded • Reducesstate sov as expected to follow laws they didn’t write INTERNATIONAL LAW • State’sstillsov so can ignore it, especially if powerful • China, Russia and US regard themselves as above international law and don’t follow unlessin their own interest • Laws are just standards on HR, con昀氀ict and border disputes so open to interpretation • Also, no way to enforce them as no international police force • Statesretain sov as national law takes precedence over international GLOBAL CULTURE • Resulted in homogenisation of culture • West has dominated this process known as ‘cultural imperialism’ as West impose values on world • US bene昀椀ted astheir culture has spread most, other countriesrefer to it as ‘cola-colonisation’ • Impactsstate sov as western take on DEMOCRACY • Recently increased and allowed statesto keep sov even with growth of globalisation • Democracy organised at national level, delivers legitimacy that globalisation doesn’t have • Allowsstatesto justify own rulings over international decisions and justi昀椀es ignoring international law, Tuto24 resources human rights now expected to be followed, limiting sov as can’t choose own course of action especially powerfulstates e.g. US, Russia, China • Democracy allowsstatesto retain sov TECHNOLOGY • Many processes now outside state control • Resulted in increase in fake news (especially during the Trump administration), cybercrime and cyberwarfare mainly by Russia and China, which threatens state security • Growth in demonstrations against political regimes e.g. Arab Spring, as easier to organise due to tech • Weakened state sov as harder to control national politics due to interconnectedness TECHNOLOGY • Retained sov by restricting accessto internet • Most notably in China where state has successfully retained control through state led company systems and banned western media, known as‘great 昀椀rewall of China ’, that employers over 50,000 to protect it • Restricted accessto internet has meant it has retained sov and restricted globalisation Global Governance: Political and Economic Evaluate the extent to which the poverty of the South is a consequence of the policies and actions of the North (30 marks) North South BRANDT REPORT • Sets out distinction based on economic development • Separates wealthy North from poor South, including Australia and New Zealand as North • North controls 4/5 global income but only ¼ of population, creates extreme inequality • Also, uneven immigration and distribution of tech allows North to develop more, so South su昀昀ers from poverty due to North BRANDT REPORT • Initially represented which states had weak development but no longer astrue e.g. China, Taiwan, India and Hong Kong rapidly becoming wealthy • Likely due to own policies ad selfdetermination • North also becoming more unequal over time suggesting South poverty isn’t due to North but states themselves POLITICAL INSTITUTIONS • E.g. IMF, WTO, World Bank, G7 and G20 all dominated by wealthy North • G7 represents about 50% of global net worth and consists of elite countries • Means can act in own interest at POLITICAL INSTITUTIONS • IMF, World Bank, and WTO created as part of Bretton-Woods agreement (1944) to eliminate restrictions on trade • South could bene昀椀

Mostrar más Leer menos
Institución
Grado










Ups! No podemos cargar tu documento ahora. Inténtalo de nuevo o contacta con soporte.

Escuela, estudio y materia

Institución
Grado

Información del documento

Subido en
14 de marzo de 2025
Número de páginas
17
Escrito en
2024/2025
Tipo
Examen
Contiene
Preguntas y respuestas

Temas

Vista previa del contenido

A LEVEL POLITICS GLOBAL
POLITICS ESSAY PLAN
STUDY GUIDE 2025
GUARANTEED
DISTINCTION.




Tuto24 resources

, A Level Politics – Global Politics

States and Globalisation
Evaluate the extent to which globalisation has undermined state sovereignty (30 marks)

Undermined Retained
GLOBAL ECONOMY NATIONALISM
• Rose after collapse of Bretton- • Has widespread appeal and growing
Woods system in early 70s, shifted in popularity despite global
to deeply integrated economies interconnectedness
instead of just interlinked national • People have strong national loyalty,
ones trend towards populism,
• National economies partially protectionism and conservative
absorbed into global one nationalism in US and Europe e.g.
• States now reliant on each other so UKIP got 13% of vote in 2015
more susceptible to 昀椀nancial crash general election in UK (3rd biggest
• Di昀케cult for states to run industrial party but only 1 MP)
policy, limiting sov • Indicates states retain sov as
people’s nation interests come
before global community
INTERNATIONAL LAW INTERNATIONAL LAW
• Legal systems traditionally national • State’s still sov so can ignore it,
as have legal sov so create and especially if powerful
enforce own laws • China, Russia and US regard
• Recent shift to international law and themselves as above international
states are expected to follow it law and don’t follow unless in their
• Those that do gain higher level of own interest
respect and international credence • Laws are just standards on HR,
• Those who don’t are punished con昀氀ict and border disputes so open
through courts, sanctions, to interpretation
withdrawal of aid and invaded • Also, no way to enforce them as no
• Reduces state sov as expected to international police force
follow laws they didn’t write • States retain sov as national law
takes precedence over international
GLOBAL CULTURE DEMOCRACY
• Resulted in homogenisation of • Recently increased and allowed
culture states to keep sov even with growth
• West has dominated this process of globalisation
known as ‘cultural imperialism’ as • Democracy organised at national
West impose values on world level, delivers legitimacy that
• US bene昀椀ted as their culture has globalisation doesn’t have
spread most, other countries refer • Allows states to justify own rulings
to it as ‘cola-colonisation’ over international decisions and
• Impacts state sov as western take on justi昀椀es ignoring international law,




Tuto24 resources

, human rights now expected to be especially powerful states e.g. US,
followed, limiting sov as can’t Russia, China
choose own course of action • Democracy allows states to retain
sov
TECHNOLOGY TECHNOLOGY
• Many processes now outside state • Retained sov by restricting access to
control internet
• Resulted in increase in fake news • Most notably in China where state
(especially during the Trump has successfully retained control
administration), cybercrime and through state led company systems
cyberwarfare mainly by Russia and and banned western media, known
China, which threatens state as ‘great 昀椀rewall of China ’, that
security employers over 50,000 to protect it
• Growth in demonstrations against • Restricted access to internet has
political regimes e.g. Arab Spring, as meant it has retained sov and
easier to organise due to tech restricted globalisation
• Weakened state sov as harder to
control national politics due to
interconnectedness


Global Governance: Political and Economic
Evaluate the extent to which the poverty of the South is a consequence of the policies and
actions of the North (30 marks)

North South
BRANDT REPORT BRANDT REPORT
• Sets out distinction based on • Initially represented which states
economic development had weak development but no
• Separates wealthy North from poor longer as true e.g. China, Taiwan,
South, including Australia and New India and Hong Kong rapidly
Zealand as North becoming wealthy
• North controls 4/5 global income • Likely due to own policies ad self-
but only ¼ of population, creates determination
extreme inequality • North also becoming more unequal
• Also, uneven immigration and over time suggesting South poverty
distribution of tech allows North to isn’t due to North but states
develop more, so South su昀昀ers from themselves
poverty due to North
POLITICAL INSTITUTIONS POLITICAL INSTITUTIONS
• E.g. IMF, WTO, World Bank, G7 and • IMF, World Bank, and WTO created
G20 all dominated by wealthy North as part of Bretton-Woods
• G7 represents about 50% of global agreement (1944) to eliminate
net worth and consists of elite restrictions on trade
countries • South could bene昀椀t as can build
• Means can act in own interest at economy so the fact they didn’t is




Tuto24 resources
$9.49
Accede al documento completo:

100% de satisfacción garantizada
Inmediatamente disponible después del pago
Tanto en línea como en PDF
No estas atado a nada

Conoce al vendedor

Seller avatar
Los indicadores de reputación están sujetos a la cantidad de artículos vendidos por una tarifa y las reseñas que ha recibido por esos documentos. Hay tres niveles: Bronce, Plata y Oro. Cuanto mayor reputación, más podrás confiar en la calidad del trabajo del vendedor.
onlinetutor2025 University of South Africa (Unisa)
Seguir Necesitas iniciar sesión para seguir a otros usuarios o asignaturas
Vendido
250
Miembro desde
2 año
Número de seguidores
218
Documentos
848
Última venta
1 mes hace

4.0

17 reseñas

5
8
4
4
3
3
2
1
1
1

Recientemente visto por ti

Por qué los estudiantes eligen Stuvia

Creado por compañeros estudiantes, verificado por reseñas

Calidad en la que puedes confiar: escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron y evaluado por otros que han usado estos resúmenes.

¿No estás satisfecho? Elige otro documento

¡No te preocupes! Puedes elegir directamente otro documento que se ajuste mejor a lo que buscas.

Paga como quieras, empieza a estudiar al instante

Sin suscripción, sin compromisos. Paga como estés acostumbrado con tarjeta de crédito y descarga tu documento PDF inmediatamente.

Student with book image

“Comprado, descargado y aprobado. Así de fácil puede ser.”

Alisha Student

Preguntas frecuentes