100% de satisfacción garantizada Inmediatamente disponible después del pago Tanto en línea como en PDF No estas atado a nada 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Examen

Managerial Decision Making & Behavioral Judgment – Study Guide

Puntuación
-
Vendido
-
Páginas
88
Grado
A+
Subido en
08-03-2025
Escrito en
2024/2025

The Managerial Decision Making & Behavioral Judgment guide delves into the psychological and cognitive processes that influence decision-making within organizational settings. It explores how managers interpret data, make judgments, and take actions in complex and uncertain environments. This resource provides an in-depth look at both individual and group decision-making, heuristics, biases, and how behavioral economics influences judgments in a managerial context. The study guide covers essential decision-making frameworks such as cost-benefit analysis, risk assessment, and game theory, all while addressing common decision-making pitfalls like overconfidence, framing effects, and the influence of emotions. It also examines how managers can improve their decision-making by recognizing their cognitive limitations, understanding behavioral patterns, and applying ethical judgment. By integrating insights from psychology, economics, and management theory, this guide provides both theoretical foundations and practical tools for making informed decisions in business environments.

Mostrar más Leer menos
Institución
Managerial Decision Making & Behavioral Judgment
Grado
Managerial Decision Making & Behavioral Judgment











Ups! No podemos cargar tu documento ahora. Inténtalo de nuevo o contacta con soporte.

Libro relacionado

Escuela, estudio y materia

Institución
Managerial Decision Making & Behavioral Judgment
Grado
Managerial Decision Making & Behavioral Judgment

Información del documento

Subido en
8 de marzo de 2025
Número de páginas
88
Escrito en
2024/2025
Tipo
Examen
Contiene
Preguntas y respuestas

Temas

Vista previa del contenido

, Chapter 1 Introduction to Managerial Decision Making


Multiple choice


1) An optimal search for alternatives should last:
a. As long as needed to find the best solution.
b. As long as needed to find the first good enough solution.
c. As long as the cost of the search does not outweigh the value of the added information.
d. As long as the cost of the search is within the appropriate limits set by the decision maker.

Ans: c

Response: p. 2-3



2) Rating alternatives on each of the decision criteria is considered the most difficult stage of the
decision-making process, because:
a. It assumes we have precisely defined our priorities.
b. It requires us to forecast how each alternative solution will achieve each of our decision
criteria.
c. It requires us to compare all of the alternatives simultaneously.
d. It is likely to fail if our problem is not defined correctly, and this failure will not be detected.

Ans: b

Response: p. 3



3) In the interplay between system 1 and system 2 thinking, the key goal for managers is:
a. To improve their use of system 1 thinking.
b. To attempt to use system 2 thinking as much as possible.
c. To apply both systems in making decisions in order to perform a more thorough and
complex search for alternatives.
d. To identify when they should move from system 1 to system 2 thinking. Ans: d

Response: p. 4

, 4) Which of the following is a typical characteristic of heuristics?
a. They provide us with a simple way of dealing with complex problems.
b. They have the best likelihood of reaching an optimal solution to a problem.
c. They are time and resource consuming.
d. They are used mainly by irrational decision makers.

Ans: a

Response: p. 6



Questions 5-8 describe examples of heuristics outlined in the chapter. For each question, indicate which
heuristic it describes:

a. The representativeness heuristic.
b. The availability heuristic.
c. The confirmation heuristic.
d. The affect heuristic.



5) Inner zcity zcrime zin zthe zU.S. zgets zconsiderable zmedia zcoverage, zsuch zthat zevery zhomicide
zis zreported zin zthe znews. zIn zcontrast, za zstory zof za zperson zwho zdied zfrom za zheart zattack
zrarely zmakes zthe znews. zThis zleads zpeople zto zoverestimate zthe zfrequency zof zdeaths zdue
zto zhomicides zrelative zto zthose zdue zto zheart zfailure. z


Ans: zb

zResponse: zp.

z7-8 z




6) John zis zover zseven zfeet ztall. zWhen zasked zwhether zJohn zis za zprofessional zbasketball
zplayer zor za zsoftware zprogrammer, zmany zpeople zpredict zthe zformer, zeven zthough

zthere zare zmany zmore zsoftware zprogrammers, zeven zvery ztall zones, zthan zprofessional

zbasketball zplayers. zAns: za z


Response: zp. z8-9 z

, 7) After zreading zabout zthe zpositive zeffect zchocolate zhas zon zstudent zperformance, za zteacher
zgives zeach zstudent zin za zclass za zchocolate zbar zbefore ztaking zan zexam. z15 zout zof z22

zstudents zin zthat zclass zget zan zA zon zthe zexam. zThe zteacher ztherefore zconcludes zthat

zchocolate zenhances zperformance. zAns: zc z


Response: zp. z9-10 z



8) A zcommon zwisdom zin zpolitics zis zthat zthe zmore zan zargument zis zrepeated, zthe zmore
zit zwill zbe zconsidered zby zthe zpublic zas zreliable zand ztrue. z


Ans: zb

zResponse: zp.

z7-8 z




9) The zaffect zheuristic zcan zexplain zwhy z
a. People zwho zlive zin zCalifornia zare zassumed zto zbe zhappier zthan zpeople zwho
zlive zin zthe zMidwest. z

b. Students zpredict zthey zwill zbe zsadder zafter zgetting za zbad zgrade zon za ztest
zthan zthey zactually zare zin zthese zsituations. z

c. People zdo znot zremember zsad zevents zfrom ztheir zearly zchildhood. z
d. Stock zprices zgo zup zon zsunny zdays. z

Ans: zd

Response: zp. z10




True/False


10) Succumbing zto zheuristics zis zinevitable, zand zthere zis zno zway zto zmake zjudgment zless zprone zthem. z
Rather, z zone z zcan z zonly z zbe z zaware z zof z zthe z zbiasing z ze z


Ans: zFalse

zResponse: zp.
$12.49
Accede al documento completo:

100% de satisfacción garantizada
Inmediatamente disponible después del pago
Tanto en línea como en PDF
No estas atado a nada

Conoce al vendedor

Seller avatar
Los indicadores de reputación están sujetos a la cantidad de artículos vendidos por una tarifa y las reseñas que ha recibido por esos documentos. Hay tres niveles: Bronce, Plata y Oro. Cuanto mayor reputación, más podrás confiar en la calidad del trabajo del vendedor.
ExamGenie Johns Hopkins University School Of Nursing
Seguir Necesitas iniciar sesión para seguir a otros usuarios o asignaturas
Vendido
289
Miembro desde
1 año
Número de seguidores
7
Documentos
1104
Última venta
16 horas hace
Exam Genie’s Success Vault

⭐ Loved the document? Please don’t forget to leave a review after your purchase — your feedback helps me grow and keeps more quality materials coming your way! ⭐ Feel free to reach out if you need any specific materials or wish to raise an issue—I’m always here to help. Thank you in advance for your support and trust!

4.4

64 reseñas

5
43
4
10
3
6
2
1
1
4

Recientemente visto por ti

Por qué los estudiantes eligen Stuvia

Creado por compañeros estudiantes, verificado por reseñas

Calidad en la que puedes confiar: escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron y evaluado por otros que han usado estos resúmenes.

¿No estás satisfecho? Elige otro documento

¡No te preocupes! Puedes elegir directamente otro documento que se ajuste mejor a lo que buscas.

Paga como quieras, empieza a estudiar al instante

Sin suscripción, sin compromisos. Paga como estés acostumbrado con tarjeta de crédito y descarga tu documento PDF inmediatamente.

Student with book image

“Comprado, descargado y aprobado. Así de fácil puede ser.”

Alisha Student

Preguntas frecuentes