Summary Bolshevik consolidation essay plan

unisied more significant threat or men the wa r +
treaty left
would've
readership
H
they lost
t he
unified
geographical had been eliminated
Russia
Lenin
no

deemed
other option
aims November 1917 elections aims
y ↑ it
advantage nesscary to T Significant
↑
he was
12 million roles sign to save desperation eventually
by strong that led
they
wanted to
Russia Of the
listned to

facters
leadershipto
overthrow the of people
The removal payment ↑
Y
there was little other
Bolsheviks roubles -
of any power victory 3 million option though Lenin threatened
The removal of the
↑
usforcewas
threats enabled X to
resign due

them to be unable constituent
assembly ↑
the loss of
↑ to divisions

overtown
significant economic
↑
to be
M te
eliminates the victory
in
T
the whites loss
2 million
Of decline
↳
mrecks the civil made 2
square ↑ Bukharin wanted


↑ up lost 74 %
any kilometers to continue
establishment
↑
war
or Tsarist estimated loss of VG of its the wa r


one T
↑ of the population iron + coal
of me
- Y ↑
centrol ESTABLISHMENT the terms

CIVIL WAR
party -
↑
It created
Of the the war was unpopular division within


Of THE
ONE-PARTY STATE treatyI X
with
many X the
party
development Y the terms of the
the use

I
civil
WWIB
war were n o t
or censors - ↑ >
-
between te reds
,
whites
- treaty
repression
X
of favourable
↓
↑
greens ↳
opposition papers
were
↓ BREST-LITOUSA loss of Ukraine

THE BOLSHEVIK CONSOLIDATION OF
,
banned the use Georgia, Armenia +
of the Red
↓ Azerbaijan
+ the
terror
POWER BY 1924 WAS DUE TO THE initially
more
resulting
in
Secret
police(neka)
they benefitted from

widespread Bolshevik POPULARITY OF THEIR POLICIES X considerable enthusiasm for promising
propaganda
Increased confinement
Y (JUNE 2017) ↓ to build a new+ better society
↳
Of class enemies into
conclusion BOLSHEVIN 'peace ,
land-bread

f concentration camps

be
·
It was a combination of their popular policies,
/
POLICIES -
They were able to blame

it can civil and their use of ferce the NEP shortages difficulties o n the
consequency
+
in the war
their victory
argued that this factor
that consolidated their power
. However , many policies & ↓ ↓ Civil war 'forced' on them

to their power by the opponents
were more significant weren't popular/effective in consolidating far more War The decrees
the consolidation of either caused popular amongst communism
except the NEP this is because
they ↳
the Bolsheviks power the
.




create more opposition peasants ↓ ↓
↓ the decree on land

economy to decrease or
↓
compared to popular of the civil war and ↓ the Tambor The workers

againstmem. The
victory saw
revolt a result of decree legitimised the seizure

policies the use of terror was much more
significant
in the end
The failed ↓
of private land by
of grain ↓ the peasants
their policies, Capitalism
consolidating their power compared
to state
requisitioning Kronstadt improving The
rights of
in an a tempt to
as this reduced the level of opposition/threat against revolt workers
by shortening
Y consolidate meir
the workers
them.
allowed
sell on
to
Both wanted ↓ power day
the
free market an end to
Boishevik power
↓ ↓
/ dominant feature the policies weren't
Y
new
NEP allowed
=
grain requisitioning exactly popular
Small scale supports that

metal a
culminated the auuren ↓
↓
this in industries to return communism ↓
-
war led to
manyfactoryar
acceptance of and the end of o the
overall was neither popular very unpopular reductions + a ere
the Bolsheviks and the rationing was
the amongst the peasants
in
nor effective in
↑ Bread frustrated
popularity of the NEP allowed popular amongst rationing caused by the

power consolidation confiscateirgrainseprice
wa
, worker unrest new decrees
the working class
them to consolidate power