• ¿Documento equivocado? Cámbialo gratis
  • Escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron
  • Inmediatamente disponible después del pago
  • Leer en línea o como PDF
Vender
¿Dónde estudias?
Tu idioma
Document preview thumbnail
Vista previa 2 fuera de 5 páginas
Examen

Psyc 516 Ch. 4 Complete Solutions

Document preview thumbnail
Vista previa 2 fuera de 5 páginas

Psyc 516 Ch. 4 Complete Solutions Criteria evaluative standards that can be used as yardsticks for measuring employees' success or failure; these evaluative standards can be used to measure employee performance, personnel selection, placement, promotion, succession planning, and performance management; it is useful when prediction is involved; usually is given less attention than prediction Two types of criteria 1) ultimate criterion and 2) actual criterion Ultimate criterion everything that ultimately defines success on the job; ideal measure of all the relevant aspects of job performance; "real performance"; everything that makes up job performance; is ultimate in the sense that one cannot look beyond it for any further standard by which to judge performance Actual criterion best real-world representation of the ultimate criterion; we develop it to reflect or overlap with the ultimate criterion as much as possible; includes only those elements of the ultimate criterion that we intend to measure; supervisor ratings are an example of actual criterion "Criterion problem" refers to the difficulties involved in the process of conceptualizing and measuring performance constructs that are multi-dimensional, dynamic, and appropriate for different purposes Five things that make a good criterion relevance, reliability, sensitivity, practicality, fairness Relevance degree to which the actual criterion is related to the ultimate criterion; degree of correlation or overlap between actual criterion and ultimate criterion (we want as much overlap as possible! percentage of variance in the ultimate criterion accounted for by the actual criterion) Conditions limiting relevance 1) criterion deficiency 2) criterion contamination Criterion deficiency when a criterion does not cover the entire domain we are hoping to measure; occurs when a major source of variance in the ultimate criterion is not in the actual criterion; a criterion is deficient to the extent that these dimensions are not tapped by our criterion measure but are important to the criterion construct Individual Dimensionality the idea that people doing the same job may be considered equally good at performing a job while making completely different contributions Criterion contamination occurs when the operational or actual criterion includes variance that is unrelated to the ultimate criterion; contamination itself may be subdivided into two distinct parts, error and bias: 1) Error - by definition is random variation (e.g., due to nonstandardized procedures in testing, individual fluctuations in feelings) and cannot correlate with anything except by chance alone 2) Bias - by contrast, represents systematic criterion contamination, and it can correlate with predictor measures Performance actual on-the-job behaviors that are relevant to the organization's goals; also referred to as criterion, performance, and performance criterion; performance is defined as both behavior and results Three different types of criterion dimensionality are: 1) Static 2) Dynamic 3) Individual Static Dimensionality are fixed dimensions of criteria; includes two general facets of performance: task and contextual performance Task performance a) the activities that transform raw materials into goods and services that are produced by the org and b) the activities that help with the transformation process by replenishing the supply of raw materials; distributing its finished products; or providing important planning, coordination, supervising or staff functions that enable it to function effectively & efficiently

Vista previa del contenido

Psyc 516 Ch. 4 Complete Solutions

Criteria ✅evaluative standards that can be used as yardsticks for measuring employees' success or
failure; these evaluative standards can be used to measure employee performance, personnel selection,
placement, promotion, succession planning, and performance management; it is useful when prediction
is involved; usually is given less attention than prediction



Two types of criteria ✅1) ultimate criterion and

2) actual criterion



Ultimate criterion ✅everything that ultimately defines success on the job; ideal measure of all the
relevant aspects of job performance; "real performance"; everything that makes up job performance; is
ultimate in the sense that one cannot look beyond it for any further standard by which to judge
performance



Actual criterion ✅best real-world representation of the ultimate criterion; we develop it to reflect or
overlap with the ultimate criterion as much as possible; includes only those elements of the ultimate
criterion that we intend to measure; supervisor ratings are an example of actual criterion



"Criterion problem" ✅refers to the difficulties involved in the process of conceptualizing and measuring
performance constructs that are multi-dimensional, dynamic, and appropriate for different purposes



Five things that make a good criterion ✅relevance, reliability, sensitivity, practicality, fairness



Relevance ✅degree to which the actual criterion is related to the ultimate criterion; degree of
correlation or overlap between actual criterion and ultimate criterion (we want as much overlap as
possible! percentage of variance in the ultimate criterion accounted for by the actual criterion)



Conditions limiting relevance ✅1) criterion deficiency

2) criterion contamination

, Criterion deficiency ✅when a criterion does not cover the entire domain we are hoping to measure;
occurs when a major source of variance in the ultimate criterion is not in the actual criterion; a criterion
is deficient to the extent that these dimensions are not tapped by our criterion measure but are
important to the criterion construct



Individual Dimensionality ✅the idea that people doing the same job may be considered equally good at
performing a job while making completely different contributions



Criterion contamination ✅occurs when the operational or actual criterion includes variance that is
unrelated to the ultimate criterion; contamination itself may be subdivided into two distinct parts, error
and bias:

1) Error - by definition is random variation (e.g., due to nonstandardized procedures in testing, individual
fluctuations in feelings) and cannot correlate with anything except by chance alone

2) Bias - by contrast, represents systematic criterion contamination, and it can correlate with predictor
measures



Performance ✅actual on-the-job behaviors that are relevant to the organization's goals; also referred to
as criterion, performance, and performance criterion; performance is defined as both behavior and
results



Three different types of criterion dimensionality are: ✅1) Static

2) Dynamic

3) Individual



Static Dimensionality ✅are fixed dimensions of criteria; includes two general facets of performance:
task and contextual performance



Task performance ✅a) the activities that transform raw materials into goods and services that are
produced by the org and

b) the activities that help with the transformation process by replenishing the supply of raw materials;
distributing its finished products; or providing important planning, coordination, supervising or staff
functions that enable it to function effectively & efficiently

Información del documento

Subido en
17 de octubre de 2024
Número de páginas
5
Escrito en
2024/2025
Tipo
Examen
Contiene
Preguntas y respuestas
$10.99

¿Documento equivocado? Cámbialo gratis Dentro de los 14 días posteriores a la compra y antes de descargarlo, puedes elegir otro documento. Puedes gastar el importe de nuevo.
Escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron
Inmediatamente disponible después del pago
Leer en línea o como PDF

Seller avatar
Los indicadores de reputación están sujetos a la cantidad de artículos vendidos por una tarifa y las reseñas que ha recibido por esos documentos. Hay tres niveles: Bronce, Plata y Oro. Cuanto mayor reputación, más podrás confiar en la calidad del trabajo del vendedor.
CertifiedGrades
3.9
(38)
Vendido
149
Seguidores
61
Artículos
8729
Última venta
1 mes hace




Por qué los estudiantes eligen Stuvia

Creado por compañeros estudiantes, verificado por reseñas

Calidad en la que puedes confiar: escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron y evaluado por otros que han usado estos resúmenes.

¿No estás satisfecho? Elige otro documento

¡No te preocupes! Puedes elegir directamente otro documento que se ajuste mejor a lo que buscas.

Paga como quieras, empieza a estudiar al instante

Sin suscripción, sin compromisos. Paga como estés acostumbrado con tarjeta de crédito y descarga tu documento PDF inmediatamente.

Student with book image

“Comprado, descargado y aprobado. Así de fácil puede ser.”

Alisha Student

Preguntas frecuentes