Escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron Inmediatamente disponible después del pago Leer en línea o como PDF ¿Documento equivocado? Cámbialo gratis 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Document preview thumbnail
Vista previa 4 fuera de 47 páginas
Resumen

Summary Experimental Research

Document preview thumbnail
Vista previa 4 fuera de 47 páginas

This summary is a summary of the lectures of Femke van Horen. In this summary you will have example, explanations and also what is asked in the exam.

Vista previa del contenido

Suzanne van Heyningen Experimental Research



Summary Experimental Research




Last exam tips
- Articles and book are additional material
- If a number can be higher than 1 you need to write a 0, e.g. p = .05 whereas F = 0.30
- If you have a significant effect, always report M’s and SD’s
- If you talk about means in your hypothesis, you also need to report it




1

,Suzanne van Heyningen Experimental Research


Lecture one
Conversion optimization




A structured and systematic Taking the traffic there is
Informed by data
approach to improving the and making the most of it
insights & psychology
performance of a website


Types of Marketing Research
Survey: Experiment:
a) Cross- sectional a) Field
b) Longitudinal b) Lab
c) Panel
Meaning • Gather information with • Factor is isolated to test hypothesis
questionnaire • 1 or more IV’s are manipulated and
change DV while controlling for
extraneous variable
Knowledge focus • Descriptive • Experimental
• Hypothesis testing • Hypothesis testing

Validity focus • External validity • Internal validity
Breath of finding • Medium • Narrow


Why experimenting?
1. Describe
2. Predict
3. Explain behavior of market-parties/ employees/ buyers
❖ Break up phenomena in variables and relations between those variables

Behavioral Research
1. Descriptive research
- Thoughts, feelings, ideas, behaviors
2. Correlational research
- Identifying relationships between different observed variables: measuring thoughts, feelings,
behavior
- It only shows a relationship but it cannot tell whether one variable actually causes the other
- Spurious correlation – third explaining variable




2

,Suzanne van Heyningen Experimental Research


From direction to prediction
1. Description
- Careful observation
2. Correlation
- relationship between observed variables
3. Experimental
- When the quest for causality is the objective, then an experiment is the method of choice

- Example : What impact does assortment size have on store choice?
Causality
Relationship between Asymmetrical A (cause) →
2 variables direction B (effect)

Change in A is No alternative explanation for
accompanies by change in B than change in A
change in B (control others)



Experimental Research
1. It is the only type of research that (potentially) can demonstrate that change in one variable causes a
predictable change in another variable.
2. Most difficult: making sure that a change in Y was not caused by something else than X.
- Test specific hypotheses about the relationship between a cause and an effect via controlled
The effect of an IV on a DV
- Manipulating the independent variable
- Measure effects on dependent variable
- Control other influences (high internal but low external validity)

Importance of randomization




Use different people with Potential confounds Change in Y can
different characteristics are under control be attributed to X

Experimental research : Main steps
1. Theoretical Framework
- Problem Identification
- Hypothesis Formulation
2. Experimental Design
- Manipulation of IVs
- Measurement of DV
- Control for confounds
3. Data analyses
- Get familiar with your data
- Checks
- Conduct main analyses
- Conduct follow up analyses

3

, Suzanne van Heyningen Experimental Research


Problem Identification
Sources of research ideas

• Real life experiences
• Previous research and theory
- Conflicting findings
- Boundary conditions
- Find explanation for observed effects
- Propositions of a theory that are not tested yet
- Applying a theory to a consumer setting

Define your topic by identifying all relevant factors

- DV : What do you want to predict/explain/measure?
- IV : What do you think is the cause/manipulate?
- Moderator : What do you think can change the effect?
- Mediator : What do you think drives the effect?

Define problem statement

- Always draw a conceptual model

Good research problems should both

- Have real life relevance (implication for managers and consumers)
- Contribute to current knowledge (theoretical contribution)




4

Información del documento

Estudio
Subido en
19 de marzo de 2019
Número de páginas
47
Escrito en
2018/2019
Tipo
Resumen
$6.60

¿Documento equivocado? Cámbialo gratis Dentro de los 14 días posteriores a la compra y antes de descargarlo, puedes elegir otro documento. Puedes gastar el importe de nuevo.
Escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron
Inmediatamente disponible después del pago
Leer en línea o como PDF

Seller avatar
suzannevh95
3.0
(1)
Vendido
5
Seguidores
5
Artículos
1
Última venta
3 año hace

Reseñas de compradores verificados




Por qué los estudiantes eligen Stuvia

Creado por compañeros estudiantes, verificado por reseñas

Calidad en la que puedes confiar: escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron y evaluado por otros que han usado estos resúmenes.

¿No estás satisfecho? Elige otro documento

¡No te preocupes! Puedes elegir directamente otro documento que se ajuste mejor a lo que buscas.

Paga como quieras, empieza a estudiar al instante

Sin suscripción, sin compromisos. Paga como estés acostumbrado con tarjeta de crédito y descarga tu documento PDF inmediatamente.

Student with book image

“Comprado, descargado y aprobado. Así de fácil puede ser.”

Alisha Student

Preguntas frecuentes