Escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron Inmediatamente disponible después del pago Leer en línea o como PDF ¿Documento equivocado? Cámbialo gratis 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Resumen

Summary James I and Finance

Puntuación
-
Vendido
-
Páginas
2
Subido en
12-08-2017
Escrito en
2016/2017

analysis of James I and finance economic problems. How did james I raise money. failure of the great contract

Institución
Grado

Vista previa del contenido

J1 and Finance:

Ordinary revenue was the income that J1 received annually. It came from:

 Crown lands – most important source of revenue despite E1 previously selling off £800,000.
Convenient form of patronage. This was the quickest/easiest way to £ in emergencies so their
importance .
 Customs revenue/T&P – 2nd major source. By 1612, they brought in nearly X3 as much as Crown
lands. 1604, Crown stopped directly collecting customs (taxes on imports/exports) and it was leased
out to a group of merchants in return for annual rent. Basically the ‘customs farmers’ payed J1 for
the right to collect customs revenue, which they were able to keep. The + of this was:
 J1 got a regular income + additional source of patronage. The group became v close
w/Crown who would probably be willing to make loans in emergencies.
 Good for farmer because J1 never demanded a price for the customs that reflected their
true worth. J1 valued merchants’ support over getting maximum income.
 BUT P saw its control of taxation being undermined
 Bate’s Case 1606 – Happened in the Court of Exchequer (deals w/cases affecting the revenues of
the Crown). It’s often referred to as the ‘case of impositions’ (case of tax’s).
 J1 imposed a duty (tax) on currants that were being imported.
 John Bate (merchant) refused to pay. He argued that the duty had not been sanctioned by P.
 Bates lost the case because J1 has the right to regulate trade for the security of the realm.
 This case opened the way to hugely the range/extent of customs (the duties levied by a gov
on imported goods).
 1608 – new duties AKA impositions (duties on specific goods) were levied on 1400 items,
w/no real proof that it was in the interest of the trade. These impositions brought in an extra
£70,000 a year to the Exchequer. By the end of the 1630’s, the Crown was dependant on ½
of its income on customs.
 Wardship – if a landowner died and kids were too young to inherit the land (or a woman), J1 had the
right to take it and make profit till the kids grew up. 1610, brought in £65,000.
 Purveyance – the right of the court to buy things at fixed prices well below the market rates. This
system was abused by corrupt officials.

Lord Hay – banquet, spent £2200. J1 paid for this

Robert Cecil (Earl of Salisbury) – tried to restrain J1 by ‘Book of Bounty’ (1608). This prohibited J1 giving away
major items (lands, customs), but it was a FAILURE. J1 gave cash instead and no one could afford to oppose
him for long if they valued their position.

He was also taking advantage of the revenue system as he got £1400 from a wardship that earnt J1 £370. He
stole from the Crown yet negotiated the Great contract to strengthen royal finances. This shows how many
people didn’t want the system to be reformed.

OTHER PROBLEMS: Despite making peace w/Spain, military costs still . In Ireland between 1603-8, £600,000
was spent on the army. English garrisons had to be upheld in the Netherlands (England’s biggest trading
partner) which also cost. The system which J1 got revenue was v corrupt.

Corrupt taxation – the poorest were excluded from this. Those who were liable had to declare their worth
and then be taxed. This was v abused as many stated less than what they were worth so they would pay less.
EG: Cranfield (worth £90,000 but taxed £150) and B (2nd richest in England but taxed £400).

Subsidy rolls – records of taxation that determined how much each area should pay. More people died than
those who moved into an area so this made subsidy rolls shrink. Major landowners didn’t want to pay more
than they had to just to make up for others. EG: SUFFOLK, 1557 = 66 people assessed (land/goods) worth
£521 BUT 1628 = 37 people assessed on £77.

1624 Subsidy Act – Commons generously (their opinion) gave J1 £300,000 which was inadequate (LOOK AT
J1/P FOR MORE INFO)

Libro relacionado

Escuela, estudio y materia

Nivel de Estudio
Editores
Tema
Curso

Información del documento

¿Un libro?
Desconocido
Subido en
12 de agosto de 2017
Número de páginas
2
Escrito en
2016/2017
Tipo
RESUMEN

Temas

$5.43
Accede al documento completo:

¿Documento equivocado? Cámbialo gratis Dentro de los 14 días posteriores a la compra y antes de descargarlo, puedes elegir otro documento. Puedes gastar el importe de nuevo.
Escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron
Inmediatamente disponible después del pago
Leer en línea o como PDF

Conoce al vendedor

Seller avatar
Los indicadores de reputación están sujetos a la cantidad de artículos vendidos por una tarifa y las reseñas que ha recibido por esos documentos. Hay tres niveles: Bronce, Plata y Oro. Cuanto mayor reputación, más podrás confiar en la calidad del trabajo del vendedor.
sony42dog OCR
Seguir Necesitas iniciar sesión para seguir a otros usuarios o asignaturas
Vendido
19
Miembro desde
8 año
Número de seguidores
14
Documentos
92
Última venta
2 año hace

4.2

6 reseñas

5
4
4
1
3
0
2
0
1
1

Documentos populares

Recientemente visto por ti

Por qué los estudiantes eligen Stuvia

Creado por compañeros estudiantes, verificado por reseñas

Calidad en la que puedes confiar: escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron y evaluado por otros que han usado estos resúmenes.

¿No estás satisfecho? Elige otro documento

¡No te preocupes! Puedes elegir directamente otro documento que se ajuste mejor a lo que buscas.

Paga como quieras, empieza a estudiar al instante

Sin suscripción, sin compromisos. Paga como estés acostumbrado con tarjeta de crédito y descarga tu documento PDF inmediatamente.

Student with book image

“Comprado, descargado y aprobado. Así de fácil puede ser.”

Alisha Student

Preguntas frecuentes