Escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron Inmediatamente disponible después del pago Leer en línea o como PDF ¿Documento equivocado? Cámbialo gratis 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Document preview thumbnail
Vista previa 1 fuera de 4 páginas
Resumen

Summary 1.8 Problem 3: multi-tasking and multimedia

Document preview thumbnail
Vista previa 1 fuera de 4 páginas

This is a detailed explanation of the problem including the articles.

Vista previa del contenido

PROBLEM 3: TECHNOLOGY AND LEARNING

THEORIES IN ALL THE ARTICLES

 Arousal theory: holds that adding entertaining auditory adjuncts will make the learning task more
interesting and thereby increase the learner's overall level of arousal (leading to increased attention).
INCORRECT
 Coherence theory: when giving multimedia explanation, use few rather than many extraneous words
and pictures. CORRECT
 Cognitive load theory: instructional messages should be designed in ways that minimize the chances
of overloading the learner’s cognitive system. CORRECT
 Dual coding theory: visual and verbal materials are processed in different processing systems.
CORRECT
 Cognitive load theory: processing capacities of visual and verbal working memories (or information-
processing channels) are severely limited. CORRECT
 Constructivist learning theory: meaningful learning occurs when learners actively select relevant
information, organize it into coherent representations, and integrate it with other knowledge.
CORRECT
 Redundancy effect: two sources of information at once causes overload. CORRECT
 Split-attention hypothesis: adding redundant text hurts student learning of a multimedia
explanation. CORRECT
 Information delivery hypothesis: two ways of presenting words are better than one. INCORRECT
 Redundancy principle: when making a multimedia presentation consisting of a narrated animation,
don’t add on-screen text that duplicates words that are already spoken in narration. CORRECT
 Coherence effect: inserted video and narration activate inappropriate prior knowledge. CORRECT
 Emotional interest hypothesis: adding interesting details to a passage increases overall arousal and
therefore results in more learning overall.. INCORRECT
 Seductive details hypothesis: students try harder to understand material when the material is
presented in a way that highlights the underlying conceptual structure. CORRECT
 Coherence principle: students understand a multimedia explanation more deeply when interesting
but conceptually irrelevant video and narration are excluded rather than included. CORRECT
 Bottle neck theory: CORRECT.

RESULTS FROM EACH AR TICLE


A COHERENCE EFFECT IN MULTIMEDIA LEARNIN G (MORENO & MAYER)
They tested if adding bells and whistles (background music and/or sounds) would improve the quality of a
multimedia instructional message. For some students, the authors added background music (Group NM),
sounds (Group NS), both (Group NSM), or neither (Group N).

 On tests of retention and transfer, groups receiving music performed worse than groups not receiving
music; and groups receiving sounds performed worse (only in Experiment 2) than groups not
receiving sounds.
 The more relevant and integrated sounds are, the more they will help students' understanding of the
materials (better transfer and retention).

Información del documento

Estudio
Subido en
15 de junio de 2016
Número de páginas
4
Escrito en
2015/2016
Tipo
Resumen
$4.19

¿Documento equivocado? Cámbialo gratis Dentro de los 14 días posteriores a la compra y antes de descargarlo, puedes elegir otro documento. Puedes gastar el importe de nuevo.
Escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron
Inmediatamente disponible después del pago
Leer en línea o como PDF

Seller avatar
Los indicadores de reputación están sujetos a la cantidad de artículos vendidos por una tarifa y las reseñas que ha recibido por esos documentos. Hay tres niveles: Bronce, Plata y Oro. Cuanto mayor reputación, más podrás confiar en la calidad del trabajo del vendedor.
nataliabatres
3.9
(41)
Vendido
116
Seguidores
61
Artículos
30
Última venta
2 año hace


Reseñas de compradores verificados




Por qué los estudiantes eligen Stuvia

Creado por compañeros estudiantes, verificado por reseñas

Calidad en la que puedes confiar: escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron y evaluado por otros que han usado estos resúmenes.

¿No estás satisfecho? Elige otro documento

¡No te preocupes! Puedes elegir directamente otro documento que se ajuste mejor a lo que buscas.

Paga como quieras, empieza a estudiar al instante

Sin suscripción, sin compromisos. Paga como estés acostumbrado con tarjeta de crédito y descarga tu documento PDF inmediatamente.

Student with book image

“Comprado, descargado y aprobado. Así de fácil puede ser.”

Alisha Student

Preguntas frecuentes