• ¿Documento equivocado? Cámbialo gratis
  • Escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron
  • Inmediatamente disponible después del pago
  • Leer en línea o como PDF
Vender
¿Dónde estudias?
Tu idioma
Document preview thumbnail
Vista previa 1 fuera de 10 páginas
Notas de lectura

Occupier's liability

Document preview thumbnail
Vista previa 1 fuera de 10 páginas

Mentions the occupier's liability both to visitors and trespasser on a property. Follows by stating the defences a claimant can use in the court of law and if any exemptions to the law exists. Every important aspect is related to statutory law and occasionally to UK case law.

Vista previa del contenido

Lecture 8 – Occupier’s liability


An occupier has a duty to maintain the premises safely for the benefit of third parties on or outside
the premises
 Occupier must also ensure that the use of premises does not cause unreasonable
inconvenience to other people
 Occupier’s liability Act 1957 – Visitors
 Occupier’s liability Act 1984 – Trespassers
o Both Acts only deal with the state of premises (static duty) any other situation is
covered by common law negligence (activity duty)
o Revill v Newberry (1996) – Farmer hiding in his shed shot at vandals on his property

Revill v Newbery - 1996 (lawteacher.net)
o Difference between dangerous condition and dangerous activity




Occupier’s liability to people on the premises
 Negligent activities – Occupiers who undertake activities on their land without taking
reasonable care may be liable to a third party
 Dangerous premises – Occupiers have a legal duty to maintain the structure of their
premises in a reasonably safe condition (statute law)
 Occupier’s liability act 1957 – Covers the liability of an occupier to whom the act calls visitors
o Regulates duty which an occupier of premises owes to his visitors in respect of
danger dur to the state of the premises or things done or omitted to be done on
them (s.1 OLA 1957)
o S.2(1) – An occupier owes a common duty of care to all his visitors to the premises
o S.2(2) – Duty to take such care as in all the circumstances of the case is reasonable
to see that the visitor will be reasonably safe in using the premises for the purposes
for which he is invited or permitted to be here
 Darby v National Trust (2001) – Claimant swam in National Trust’s murky
ornamental pond. Drowning was an obvious risk, so no warning was
required
Darby v National Trust [2001] EWCA Civ 182 - Case Summary (lawprof.co)
o Duty owed to particular groups

a) Children
 S2(3)(a) – An occupier must be prepared for children to be less careful than adults
 Premises must be reasonably safe for children
 Glasgow Corporation v Taylor (1922) – Red berries in public park (allurement – take
measures to protect children to keep them out of danger)

Información del documento

Estudio
Desconocido
Subido en
26 de enero de 2023
Número de páginas
10
Escrito en
2022/2023
Tipo
Notas de lectura
Profesor(es)
Desconocido
Contiene
Todas las clases
$4.81

¿Documento equivocado? Cámbialo gratis Dentro de los 14 días posteriores a la compra y antes de descargarlo, puedes elegir otro documento. Puedes gastar el importe de nuevo.
Escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron
Inmediatamente disponible después del pago
Leer en línea o como PDF

Vendido
0
Seguidores
0
Artículos
23
Última venta
-



Por qué los estudiantes eligen Stuvia

Creado por compañeros estudiantes, verificado por reseñas

Calidad en la que puedes confiar: escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron y evaluado por otros que han usado estos resúmenes.

¿No estás satisfecho? Elige otro documento

¡No te preocupes! Puedes elegir directamente otro documento que se ajuste mejor a lo que buscas.

Paga como quieras, empieza a estudiar al instante

Sin suscripción, sin compromisos. Paga como estés acostumbrado con tarjeta de crédito y descarga tu documento PDF inmediatamente.

Student with book image

“Comprado, descargado y aprobado. Así de fácil puede ser.”

Alisha Student

Preguntas frecuentes