Escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron Inmediatamente disponible después del pago Leer en línea o como PDF ¿Documento equivocado? Cámbialo gratis 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Caso

ENTR-510 Week 6 Case Study Assignment: MetaCarta

Puntuación
-
Vendido
-
Páginas
6
Grado
A+
Subido en
08-11-2022
Escrito en
2022/2023

Week 6: Written Assignment ENTR510 Entrepreneurship and New Ventures Keller Graduate School of Management Introduction MetaCarta’s founders, Doug Brenhouse, John Frank, and Erik Rauch all m eet while pursuing their graduate-level education. Doug had learned a lot working for his previous employer about the early stages of the entrepreneurial company and thought that that experience was preparing him for his own venture. John on the other hand, had an idea about creating a “software that would search online information and unstructured documents and identify which specific geographic location that a document is referring to” (Bygrave, 2014). John then recruited Erik who was also attending MIT, to help him in building the software. John and Erik entered MIT’s 50k Business Plan Competition in pursuit of finding someone who would complement their skills to partner with. That’s when they met Doug, who joined them for his business expertise and established the founding team. Why has this deal attracted venture capital? With their initial business model, in 2000 the “dot-com boom was well underway” as online advertising was growing steady so it only felt right to take advantage of the opportunity and MetaCarta created a free geographic search engine to the public in which the company could monetize its services through online advertising. During this time they figured that folks like McDonalds and Nike would be willing to pay more for their advertisement on a map that would drive real purchasers to their actual stores. “The story was resonating with early investors” and they were able to raise $100,000, that is until the “dot-com bust and the stock market fell apart” (Bygrave, 2014). They switched up their business model and thought that instead of providing a free search engine perhaps it’d be more useful as enterprise search engine to government agencies and Fortune 500 companies. Furthermore, when the federal government created DARPA (Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency), who’s mission is to provide funding to research and development of technologies that could be used by the U.S. military and/or the public, the team was able to secure funding from the agency in amount of $500,000. Not only did they receive the money from DARPA in form of grant it also provided credibility to the team and their project. Having gotten the opportunity to get a grant from DARPA it also boosted the team to a new level as the company continued to grow at a rapid pace. With DARPA’s backing added to the team’s resume, this presented them with an opportunity to seek additional funding from angel investors and capital venture firms Should MetaCarta take the Sevin Rosen offer? In my person opinion How was the valuation determined? Is there anything MetaCarta could do to improve the valuation? When John and Doug decided to solicit angel investment they knew that valuing the company at such an early stage would present a challenge. They took into consideration that if they demanded to high some investors would lose interest and if too low it could lead to the loss of their equity as financing progressed. In 2001, they were able to round up a group of investors in Boston and New York including three partners from Goldman Sachs. They were able to reach a compromise in which investments would be convertible debts and the angel investors decided to contribute $1 million with an 8% accruing interest rate. At this point their total investment was into the company was $1.6 million ($100,000 from advertising, $500,000 from DARPA, and $1 million angel investments). And has they had agreed upon a convertible debt at a discount they calculated a pre-money valuation of the company was $4 million in eighteen months considering that MetaCarta would raise any additional funds before November 2003. I think that the $5 million valuation post-money was good set value for the company as they used the post-money valuation formula to approach; Equity owned by investor = Amount invested ÷ (Agreed pre-money valuation + Amt. invested) Equity percentage owned by investor = $1M/($4M + $1M) = 20% Post-money valuation = Pre-money valuation + Amount invested = $4M + $1M = $5M Once they went through this first round of investment, they required more capital and raised a second angel round in 2002. Soon after the Business valuation | How investors determine the value of your business | Entrepreneur's Toolkit. (2013, December 6). Retrieved April 09, 2017, from

Mostrar más Leer menos
Institución
Grado









Ups! No podemos cargar tu documento ahora. Inténtalo de nuevo o contacta con soporte.

Escuela, estudio y materia

Institución
Grado

Información del documento

Subido en
8 de noviembre de 2022
Número de páginas
6
Escrito en
2022/2023
Tipo
CASO
Profesor(es)
Nurse jolly
Grado
A+

Temas

$11.49
Accede al documento completo:

¿Documento equivocado? Cámbialo gratis Dentro de los 14 días posteriores a la compra y antes de descargarlo, puedes elegir otro documento. Puedes gastar el importe de nuevo.
Escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron
Inmediatamente disponible después del pago
Leer en línea o como PDF

Conoce al vendedor

Seller avatar
Los indicadores de reputación están sujetos a la cantidad de artículos vendidos por una tarifa y las reseñas que ha recibido por esos documentos. Hay tres niveles: Bronce, Plata y Oro. Cuanto mayor reputación, más podrás confiar en la calidad del trabajo del vendedor.
EliteStudyDocs Rasmussen College
Seguir Necesitas iniciar sesión para seguir a otros usuarios o asignaturas
Vendido
3518
Miembro desde
5 año
Número de seguidores
2869
Documentos
8916
Última venta
4 días hace
High Quality Exams, Study guides, Reviews, Notes, Case Studies

Welcome to EliteStudyDocs, your ultimate destination for high-quality, verified study materials trusted by students, educators, and professionals across the globe. I specialize in providing A+ graded exam files, practice questions, complete study guides, and certification prep tailored to a wide range of academic and professional fields. Whether you're preparing for nursing licensure (NCLEX, ATI, HESI, ANCC, AANP), healthcare certifications (ACLS, BLS, PALS, PMHNP, AGNP), standardized tests (TEAS, HESI, PAX, NLN), or university-specific exams (WGU, Portage Learning, Chamberlain, and more), our documents are 100% correct, up-to-date and reviewed for accuracy. What makes my documents stand out: ✔ Latest 2026/2027 Updates ✔ Verified Questions & Correct Answers ✔ Clean, Professional Exam Format ✔ Designed for High Grades (A/A+) P/S: CHECK OUT THE PACKAGE DEALS

Lee mas Leer menos
4.0

694 reseñas

5
380
4
127
3
77
2
39
1
71

Documentos populares

Recientemente visto por ti

Por qué los estudiantes eligen Stuvia

Creado por compañeros estudiantes, verificado por reseñas

Calidad en la que puedes confiar: escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron y evaluado por otros que han usado estos resúmenes.

¿No estás satisfecho? Elige otro documento

¡No te preocupes! Puedes elegir directamente otro documento que se ajuste mejor a lo que buscas.

Paga como quieras, empieza a estudiar al instante

Sin suscripción, sin compromisos. Paga como estés acostumbrado con tarjeta de crédito y descarga tu documento PDF inmediatamente.

Student with book image

“Comprado, descargado y aprobado. Así de fácil puede ser.”

Alisha Student

Preguntas frecuentes