• ¿Documento equivocado? Cámbialo gratis
  • Escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron
  • Inmediatamente disponible después del pago
  • Leer en línea o como PDF
Vender
¿Dónde estudias?
Tu idioma
Document preview thumbnail
Vista previa 2 fuera de 9 páginas
Examen

WGU c181 OA study guide

Document preview thumbnail
Vista previa 2 fuera de 9 páginas

WGU c181 OA study guide

Vista previa del contenido

WGU c181 OA study guide

checks and balancesAns- each branch has a power to say no to the other 2 branches.
balancing out all 3 branches so 1 doesn't become more powerful

central ideas of federalist paper 51Ans- that separation of powers and checks and
balances will prevent mob-rule. if powers distributed even between 3 branches

BiacameralAns- having two branches or chambers in the legislative branch

enumerated powersAns- Powers specifically given to Congress in the Constitution;
including the power to collect taxes, coin money, regulate foreign and interstate
commerce, and declare war.

Necessary and Proper Clause/Elastic ClauseAns- Constitutional clause that gives
congress the power to make all laws "necessary and proper" for executing its powers

FederalismAns- a form of government in which power is divided between the federal, or
national, government and the states( each state has different rules they have to follow
but then there are more rules that the whole country has to follow)

Federalist Paper #10Ans- No faction (group with a common political purpose) or interest
group can control or take over power. The 3 branches of government make sure that
does not happen

judical reviewAns- the right of the Supreme Court to determine if a law violates the
Constitution

Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971)Ans- 1971 must not discourage or advance religion and does
not entangle the government with religion.

Citizens United v. Federal Election CommissionAns- ruled that individuals, corporations,
and unions could donate unlimited amounts of money to groups that make independent
political expenditures. (ex. super PACS)

Sherbert v. Verner (1963)Ans- a lady declined a job because the job conflicted with her
religion. it was forcing her to give up her religious beliefs because they wouldn't give her
unemployment benefits

Tinker v. Des Moines (1969)Ans- Students have the right to symbolic speech at school
as long as it is not disruptive

, District of Columbia v. Heller (2008)Ans- Individuals have a right to own a loaded
handgun at home for self defense

McDonald v. Chicago (2010)Ans- The right of an individual to "keep and bear arms"
cannot be ban by state or local government

Gideon v. Wainwright (1963)Ans- A person who cannot afford an attorney may have
one provided for them by the government

Miranda v. Arizona (1966)Ans- The accused suspects must be notified of their rights
before being questioned by the police

Mapp v. Ohio (1961)Ans- Evidence illegally gathered by the police may not be used in a
criminal trial

Griswold v. Connecticut (1965)Ans- Supreme Court decision in which the Court ruled
that the Constitution completely guarantees citizens' right to privacy. (woman had the
right to birth control)

Roe v. Wade (1973)Ans- increased the right to privacy to include the right to an abortion
in the first 3 months of the pregnancy

Lawrence v. Texas (2003)Ans- state law may not ban sexual relations between same-
sex partners

Dred Scott v. Sanford (1857)Ans- Slaves are not citizens (they were viewed as
property) and therefore have no legal rights

Plessy v. Ferguson (1896)Ans- Legalized racial segregation in publicly owned facilities
on the basis of "separate but equal."

Brown v. Board of Education (1954)Ans- overruled Plessy v. Ferguson, declared that
racially segregated facilities are inherently unequal and ordered all public schools
desegregated.

de facto segregationAns- Segregation resulting from economic or social conditions or
personal choice.

de jure segregationAns- government forced segregation

Civil Rights Act of 1964Ans- outlawed discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex,
or national origin

Civil Rights MovementAns- political movement for african americans equality before the
law

Información del documento

Subido en
21 de abril de 2022
Número de páginas
9
Escrito en
2021/2022
Tipo
Examen
Contiene
Desconocido
$9.99

¿Documento equivocado? Cámbialo gratis Dentro de los 14 días posteriores a la compra y antes de descargarlo, puedes elegir otro documento. Puedes gastar el importe de nuevo.
Escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron
Inmediatamente disponible después del pago
Leer en línea o como PDF

Seller avatar
Angellucious
4.0
(1)
Vendido
2
Seguidores
2
Artículos
658
Última venta
2 año hace



Por qué los estudiantes eligen Stuvia

Creado por compañeros estudiantes, verificado por reseñas

Calidad en la que puedes confiar: escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron y evaluado por otros que han usado estos resúmenes.

¿No estás satisfecho? Elige otro documento

¡No te preocupes! Puedes elegir directamente otro documento que se ajuste mejor a lo que buscas.

Paga como quieras, empieza a estudiar al instante

Sin suscripción, sin compromisos. Paga como estés acostumbrado con tarjeta de crédito y descarga tu documento PDF inmediatamente.

Student with book image

“Comprado, descargado y aprobado. Así de fácil puede ser.”

Alisha Student

Preguntas frecuentes