CAPP ANALYSIS Questions with Correct Solutions
Question:
1. Where and when was the source produced? -Place it in the appropriate context - connect
the doc across time to earlier and later eras or across space to events happening in different
places. -Don't just focus on the year of the doc - what else happened around this time? How
might this affect its meaning? -What else can you remember that is NOT explicitly stated in
the doc but could support the time & events surrounding the doc?
Answer:
HISTORICAL CONTEXT
Question:
2. AUDIENCE
Answer:
-Who is the author's intended audience?
- How might this affect the validity and reliability of the doc?
Question:
3. PURPOSE
Answer:
-What is the author's purpose for creating this source? -Why was this source produced- to
persuade? to inform? As propaganda? -How might all of this affect its reliability?
Question:
4. POINT OF VIEW
Answer:
-What do you know about the author's background? -What role are they in at the time of this
doc? What perspective do they have on the topic? From what point of view are they writing
this doc? What bias might they have?
Question:
1. Where and when was the source produced? -Place it in the appropriate context - connect
the doc across time to earlier and later eras or across space to events happening in different
places. -Don't just focus on the year of the doc - what else happened around this time? How
might this affect its meaning? -What else can you remember that is NOT explicitly stated in
the doc but could support the time & events surrounding the doc?
Answer:
HISTORICAL CONTEXT
Question:
2. AUDIENCE
Answer:
-Who is the author's intended audience?
- How might this affect the validity and reliability of the doc?
Question:
3. PURPOSE
Answer:
-What is the author's purpose for creating this source? -Why was this source produced- to
persuade? to inform? As propaganda? -How might all of this affect its reliability?
Question:
4. POINT OF VIEW
Answer:
-What do you know about the author's background? -What role are they in at the time of this
doc? What perspective do they have on the topic? From what point of view are they writing
this doc? What bias might they have?
