, Question 1
Which of the following best describes the burden of proof when a spouse
claims that property acquired during marriage is separate because it was
purchased with separate funds?
A. The spouse asserting separate character must prove separate origin by
a preponderance of the evidence, but tracing must be exact and cannot
rely on mere testimony.
B. Community property is presumed, and the spouse claiming separate
character must rebut the presumption with clear, cogent, and convincing
evidence.
C. The burden shifts to the non-claiming spouse to prove community
character once the claiming spouse shows the source was separate.
D. The burden is on the spouse who acquired the property to show it was
a gift, and only then is it separate.
Correct Answer: B - Community property is presumed, and the
spouse claiming separate character must rebut the presumption
with clear, cogent, and convincing evidence.
RATIONALE
Washington law presumes property acquired during marriage is
community; the party asserting separate character must overcome that
presumption with clear, cogent, and convincing evidence. Option A
misstates the standard as preponderance and ignores the tracing
requirement; C improperly shifts the burden; D confuses gift
characterization with the general presumption.
Question 2
In Washington, which of the following is true regarding a spouse's ability to
unilaterally encumber community personal property?
A. Either spouse may encumber community personal property without the
other's consent, as each has management power.
B. Neither spouse may encumber community personal property without
Page 2
, the other's written consent.
C. A spouse may encumber community personal property only if the
other spouse has abandoned the marriage.
D. Community personal property may be encumbered by one spouse only
if the debt is for family necessities.
Correct Answer: A - Either spouse may encumber community
personal property without the other's consent, as each has
management power.
RATIONALE
Under RCW 26.16.030, each spouse has equal management and
control of community personal property, including the power to
encumber it. Option B is incorrect because written consent is not
required for personal property; C is irrelevant; D confuses the family
necessity doctrine with management authority.
Question 3
A Washington couple divorces after 20 years. The husband receives a personal
injury settlement for an accident during the marriage. Under Washington law,
how is the settlement characterized?
A. Entirely community property because it was received during marriage.
B. Entirely separate property because it compensates for personal
suffering.
C. Community property to the extent it compensates for lost wages and
medical expenses, but separate for pain and suffering.
D. Separate property for pain and suffering, but community for punitive
damages.
Correct Answer: C - Community property to the extent it
compensates for lost wages and medical expenses, but separate
for pain and suffering.
Page 3
, RATIONALE
Washington distinguishes between portions of a personal injury award:
compensation for lost wages and medical expenses incurred during
marriage is community, while pain and suffering is separate. Option A
is overbroad; B ignores community portions; D mischaracterizes
punitive damages, which are generally community.
Question 4
Which of the following best states Washington's approach to the division of
property upon dissolution of marriage?
A. The court must divide community property equally but has discretion
to award separate property to achieve equity.
B. The court must divide both community and separate property equally.
C. The court has broad discretion to divide community and separate
property justly and equitably, but separate property is not subject to
division absent special circumstances.
D. The court may only divide community property; separate property is
immune from division.
Correct Answer: C - The court has broad discretion to divide
community and separate property justly and equitably, but
separate property is not subject to division absent special
circumstances.
RATIONALE
RCW 26.09.080 grants courts broad discretion to divide community
and separate property justly and equitably, but separate property is
generally not divided unless necessary to achieve equity. Option A is
too rigid; B requires equal division of separate property, which is
incorrect; D ignores the court's equitable power over separate
property.
Page 4
Which of the following best describes the burden of proof when a spouse
claims that property acquired during marriage is separate because it was
purchased with separate funds?
A. The spouse asserting separate character must prove separate origin by
a preponderance of the evidence, but tracing must be exact and cannot
rely on mere testimony.
B. Community property is presumed, and the spouse claiming separate
character must rebut the presumption with clear, cogent, and convincing
evidence.
C. The burden shifts to the non-claiming spouse to prove community
character once the claiming spouse shows the source was separate.
D. The burden is on the spouse who acquired the property to show it was
a gift, and only then is it separate.
Correct Answer: B - Community property is presumed, and the
spouse claiming separate character must rebut the presumption
with clear, cogent, and convincing evidence.
RATIONALE
Washington law presumes property acquired during marriage is
community; the party asserting separate character must overcome that
presumption with clear, cogent, and convincing evidence. Option A
misstates the standard as preponderance and ignores the tracing
requirement; C improperly shifts the burden; D confuses gift
characterization with the general presumption.
Question 2
In Washington, which of the following is true regarding a spouse's ability to
unilaterally encumber community personal property?
A. Either spouse may encumber community personal property without the
other's consent, as each has management power.
B. Neither spouse may encumber community personal property without
Page 2
, the other's written consent.
C. A spouse may encumber community personal property only if the
other spouse has abandoned the marriage.
D. Community personal property may be encumbered by one spouse only
if the debt is for family necessities.
Correct Answer: A - Either spouse may encumber community
personal property without the other's consent, as each has
management power.
RATIONALE
Under RCW 26.16.030, each spouse has equal management and
control of community personal property, including the power to
encumber it. Option B is incorrect because written consent is not
required for personal property; C is irrelevant; D confuses the family
necessity doctrine with management authority.
Question 3
A Washington couple divorces after 20 years. The husband receives a personal
injury settlement for an accident during the marriage. Under Washington law,
how is the settlement characterized?
A. Entirely community property because it was received during marriage.
B. Entirely separate property because it compensates for personal
suffering.
C. Community property to the extent it compensates for lost wages and
medical expenses, but separate for pain and suffering.
D. Separate property for pain and suffering, but community for punitive
damages.
Correct Answer: C - Community property to the extent it
compensates for lost wages and medical expenses, but separate
for pain and suffering.
Page 3
, RATIONALE
Washington distinguishes between portions of a personal injury award:
compensation for lost wages and medical expenses incurred during
marriage is community, while pain and suffering is separate. Option A
is overbroad; B ignores community portions; D mischaracterizes
punitive damages, which are generally community.
Question 4
Which of the following best states Washington's approach to the division of
property upon dissolution of marriage?
A. The court must divide community property equally but has discretion
to award separate property to achieve equity.
B. The court must divide both community and separate property equally.
C. The court has broad discretion to divide community and separate
property justly and equitably, but separate property is not subject to
division absent special circumstances.
D. The court may only divide community property; separate property is
immune from division.
Correct Answer: C - The court has broad discretion to divide
community and separate property justly and equitably, but
separate property is not subject to division absent special
circumstances.
RATIONALE
RCW 26.09.080 grants courts broad discretion to divide community
and separate property justly and equitably, but separate property is
generally not divided unless necessary to achieve equity. Option A is
too rigid; B requires equal division of separate property, which is
incorrect; D ignores the court's equitable power over separate
property.
Page 4
