• ¿Documento equivocado? Cámbialo gratis
  • Escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron
  • Inmediatamente disponible después del pago
  • Leer en línea o como PDF
Vender
¿Dónde estudias?
Tu idioma
Document preview thumbnail
Vista previa 3 fuera de 17 páginas
Examen

WGU D385 Task 1 Complete Practice Guide | Software Security & Testing | Static Analysis, Python Logging, Assertions, Exception Handling & Remediation | 2026

Document preview thumbnail
Vista previa 3 fuera de 17 páginas

This document provides a complete practice guide for WGU D385 Software Security & Testing Task 1, focusing on static analysis and secure Python programming practices. It covers Python logging, assertions, exception handling, vulnerability remediation, and related software security concepts. The material is designed to help students prepare for Task 1 by reviewing practical security techniques and understanding how to identify and remediate common software vulnerabilities.

Vista previa del contenido

WGU D385 Software Security & Testing

Task 1 Complete Practice Guide
Static Analysis, Python Logging, Assertions, Exception Handling & Remediation | 2026 |
2027




Institution Western Governors University (WGU)

Course D385 - Software Security & Testing

Assessment Task 1 - Static Analysis, Logging & Exception Handling

Academic Year

Total Questions 40 (4 sections x 10)

Cognitive Mix 30% recall | 50% application | 20% analysis

Question Style 75% scenario-based | 25% direct

Aligned Standards OWASP Top 10 (2021), NIST SSDF, CWE, Python PEP 8/8-style security

Tooling Python, Pytest, Bandit, SonarQube, Pylint, pip-audit, logging, bcrypt/argon2

Document Type Complete Practice Guide + Exemplar + Grading Rubric

Total Points 100 (2.5 pts per question)



Scope. This guide provides a scenario-driven, hands-on practice set for the WGU D385 Task 1
performance assessment: analyzing Python code with SAST tools, implementing secure
logging and exception handling, and verifying remediations with Pytest. It integrates 2026/2027
updates including AI-assisted static analysis, ML-based log anomaly detection, and modern
secure error-handling frameworks (RFC 7807 Problem Details).

How to use. Attempt all 40 questions before consulting Part 2 (Exemplar) or Part 3 (Grading
Rubric). Each rationale explains the exact vulnerability mechanism, the secure Pythonic fix,
and why distractors represent insecure code, broken tests, or flawed error management.




WGU D385 Task 1 | 2026 | 2027

, WGU D385 Task 1 | Static Analysis, Logging, Assertions & Remediation | 2026 Complete Practice Guide



Table of Contents
Part Content Page Reference

Cover Title page and guide metadata 1

Part 1 40-Question Practice Guide (Q1-Q40) 3

Section 1: Static Analysis & Code Review (Q1-Q10) 3

Section 2: Python Logging & Security Auditing (Q11-Q20) 6

Section 3: Assertions & Exception Handling (Q21-Q30) 9

Section 4: Remediation & 2026 Updates (Q31-Q40) 12

Part 2 Complete Solution (Exemplar Answer Key) 15

Part 3 Grading Rubric & Solution Key 17




Page 2

, WGU D385 Task 1 | Static Analysis, Logging, Assertions & Remediation | 2026 Complete Practice Guide



Part 1: Complete Practice Guide (40 Questions)
Instructions: Select the single best answer (A-D) for each question. Each question is worth 2.5
points (100 points total). Mark answers on a separate sheet before verifying with Part 2 and
Part 3.


Section 1: Static Analysis, Code Review, & Vulnerability Identification

Q1: Running Bandit against a Python repository reports B105 (hardcoded password string) on
the line `API_KEY = 'sk_live_4eC39HqLyjWDarjtT1zdp7dc'`. What is the most secure
remediation?
A. Move the key to a constants.py file tracked in git
B. Store the secret in an environment variable / secrets manager and read via
os.environ, with .env ignored by git [CORRECT]
C. Base64-encode the key and decode it at runtime
D. Rename the variable to obfuscate its purpose
Correct Answer: B
Rationale: Hardcoded secrets are a Sensitive Data Exposure flaw; secrets must live in
environment variables or a vault and never in source control. Option A relocates the flaw; Option C
is reversible obfuscation; Option D does not remove the secret.

Q2: A code review finds `cursor.execute("SELECT * FROM users WHERE id=" + user_id)`.
Bandit flags B608 (hardcoded SQL expressions). Which fix is correct?
A. Wrap the query in a try/except to suppress errors
B. Use a parameterized query: cursor.execute("SELECT * FROM users WHERE id=?",
(user_id,)) [CORRECT]
C. Escape single quotes manually before concatenation
D. Switch the driver from sqlite3 to psycopg2
Correct Answer: B
Rationale: Parameterized queries separate code from data so input is never parsed as SQL,
neutralizing injection. Option A hides errors but leaves injection; Option C is an error-prone
denylist; Option D changes drivers but not the unsafe pattern.

Q3: Bandit reports B301 (pickle) on `pickle.loads(request.data)`. Why is this finding critical, and
what is the secure replacement?
A. pickle is slow; replace with marshal for speed
B. pickle.loads can execute arbitrary code on untrusted input; replace with json.loads
plus schema validation [CORRECT]
C. pickle raises too many exceptions; replace with csv
D. pickle is deprecated; replace with shelve
Correct Answer: B
Rationale: pickle deserializes arbitrary Python objects, enabling remote code execution (A08
Insecure Deserialization); JSON with schema validation is the safe alternative. Options A, C, D
mischaracterize the risk and propose unsafe or unrelated alternatives.




Page 3

Información del documento

Subido en
10 de septiembre de 2026
Número de páginas
17
Escrito en
2026/2027
Tipo
Examen
Contiene
Preguntas y respuestas
$16.49

¿Documento equivocado? Cámbialo gratis Dentro de los 14 días posteriores a la compra y antes de descargarlo, puedes elegir otro documento. Puedes gastar el importe de nuevo.
Escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron
Inmediatamente disponible después del pago
Leer en línea o como PDF

Seller avatar
Los indicadores de reputación están sujetos a la cantidad de artículos vendidos por una tarifa y las reseñas que ha recibido por esos documentos. Hay tres niveles: Bronce, Plata y Oro. Cuanto mayor reputación, más podrás confiar en la calidad del trabajo del vendedor.
davidmiles
3.5
(4)
Vendido
25
Seguidores
0
Artículos
691
Última venta
1 semana hace



Por qué los estudiantes eligen Stuvia

Creado por compañeros estudiantes, verificado por reseñas

Calidad en la que puedes confiar: escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron y evaluado por otros que han usado estos resúmenes.

¿No estás satisfecho? Elige otro documento

¡No te preocupes! Puedes elegir directamente otro documento que se ajuste mejor a lo que buscas.

Paga como quieras, empieza a estudiar al instante

Sin suscripción, sin compromisos. Paga como estés acostumbrado con tarjeta de crédito y descarga tu documento PDF inmediatamente.

Student with book image

“Comprado, descargado y aprobado. Así de fácil puede ser.”

Alisha Student

Preguntas frecuentes