British Institute of Non-Destructive Testing PCN
Radiographic Testing Level 2 Examination
,1. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving X-ray and gamma-ray production, energy and material attenuation for
defensible calculations and documentation in? Case EB-2707-0001: 7 checks are complete, 4 item(s) remain open, 3 supporting record(s) are available, the
last review was 9 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 8 unit(s).
A. Use the previous calculation unchanged even though one or more current inputs have changed.
B. Ignore unit or assumption differences if the final number appears reasonable.
C. Recheck the inputs, units, assumptions, and limits for X-ray and gamma-ray production, energy and material attenuation for defensible calculations;
recalculate independently and document the verified result before proceeding.
D. Adjust an input until the result falls within the target range, then record only the final value.
Correct Answer: C
Explanation: The best answer verifies X-ray and gamma-ray production, energy and material attenuation for defensible against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 4 open item(s), 3 supporting record(s), and a 8-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
2. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Geometric unsharpness, source size, distance and exposure geometry
including recognition of abnormal or? Case EB-2707-0002: 5 checks are complete, 1 item(s) remain open, 7 supporting record(s) are available, the last review
was 22 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 6 unit(s).
A. Average the conflicting results and accept the midpoint without checking the source data.
B. Recheck the inputs, units, assumptions, and limits for Geometric unsharpness, source size, distance and exposure geometry including recognition of;
recalculate independently and document the verified result before proceeding.
C. Select the most favorable result from repeated calculations without investigating the variation.
D. Ignore unit or assumption differences if the final number appears reasonable.
Correct Answer: B
Explanation: The best answer verifies Geometric unsharpness, source size, distance and exposure geometry including against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 1 open item(s), 7 supporting record(s), and a 6-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
3. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Film or digital detector characteristics, image quality and processing to
support reliable, ethical radiographic? Case EB-2707-0003: 3 checks are complete, 2 item(s) remain open, 4 supporting record(s) are available, the last review
was 11 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 4 unit(s).
A. Verify the procedure, equipment status, environmental conditions, and acceptance criteria for Film or digital detector characteristics, image quality and
processing to support reliable; repeat or confirm the test only after controls are valid.
B. Change the test sensitivity or acceptance limit without authorization to reduce false indications.
C. Use an expired or unverified reference because the difference is expected to be small.
D. Report only the final indication and omit the conditions that may have affected the test.
Correct Answer: A
Explanation: The best answer verifies Film or digital detector characteristics, image quality and processing to support against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 2 open item(s), 4 supporting record(s), and a 4-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
4. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Image-quality indicators, density, sensitivity and acceptance checks
integrated across the tasks expected in? Case EB-2707-0004: 10 checks are complete, 3 item(s) remain open, 1 supporting record(s) are available, the last
review was 24 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 2 unit(s).
A. Ignore equipment or environmental checks when the operator is experienced with the method.
B. Accept the result if it matches the expected outcome, even when a control check is invalid.
C. Use an expired or unverified reference because the difference is expected to be small.
D. Verify the procedure, equipment status, environmental conditions, and acceptance criteria for Image-quality indicators, density, sensitivity and acceptance
checks integrated across the; repeat or confirm the test only after controls are valid.
Correct Answer: D
Explanation: The best answer verifies Image-quality indicators, density, sensitivity and acceptance checks integrated across against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 3 open item(s), 1 supporting record(s), and a 2-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
5. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Radiographic technique selection for welds, castings and complex
geometry within the radiographic testing? Case EB-2707-0005: 8 checks are complete, 4 item(s) remain open, 5 supporting record(s) are available, the last
review was 13 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 19 unit(s).
A. Report only the final indication and omit the conditions that may have affected the test.
B. Repeat the test until a passing result is obtained and discard the earlier inconsistent results.
C. Verify the procedure, equipment status, environmental conditions, and acceptance criteria for Radiographic technique selection for welds, castings and
complex geometry within the; repeat or confirm the test only after controls are valid.
D. Accept the result if it matches the expected outcome, even when a control check is invalid.
Correct Answer: C
Explanation: The best answer verifies Radiographic technique selection for welds, castings and complex geometry within the against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 4 open item(s), 5 supporting record(s), and a 19-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
British Institute of Non-Destructive Testing PCN Radiographic Testing Level 2 Examination
Page 2
,6. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Interpretation of volumetric and planar discontinuity images as applied to
radiographic testing? Case EB-2707-0006: 6 checks are complete, 1 item(s) remain open, 2 supporting record(s) are available, the last review was 2 hour(s)
ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 17 unit(s).
A. Use an expired or unverified reference because the difference is expected to be small.
B. Change the test sensitivity or acceptance limit without authorization to reduce false indications.
C. Repeat the test until a passing result is obtained and discard the earlier inconsistent results.
D. Verify the procedure, equipment status, environmental conditions, and acceptance criteria for Interpretation of volumetric and planar discontinuity images as
applied to radiographic; repeat or confirm the test only after controls are valid.
Correct Answer: D
Explanation: The best answer verifies Interpretation of volumetric and planar discontinuity images as applied to radiographic against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 1 open item(s), 2 supporting record(s), and a 17-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
7. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Scatter control, screens, collimation and artifact recognition with
decisions and evidence relevant to radiographic? Case EB-2707-0007: 4 checks are complete, 2 item(s) remain open, 6 supporting record(s) are available, the
last review was 15 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 15 unit(s).
A. Verify the procedure, equipment status, environmental conditions, and acceptance criteria for Scatter control, screens, collimation and artifact recognition
with decisions and evidence; repeat or confirm the test only after controls are valid.
B. Accept the result if it matches the expected outcome, even when a control check is invalid.
C. Ignore equipment or environmental checks when the operator is experienced with the method.
D. Change the test sensitivity or acceptance limit without authorization to reduce false indications.
Correct Answer: A
Explanation: The best answer verifies Scatter control, screens, collimation and artifact recognition with decisions and against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 2 open item(s), 6 supporting record(s), and a 15-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
8. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Code, specification and acceptance-criteria application without
exceeding authorization for safe, accurate work in? Case EB-2707-0008: 2 checks are complete, 3 item(s) remain open, 3 supporting record(s) are available,
the last review was 4 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 13 unit(s).
A. Verify the procedure, equipment status, environmental conditions, and acceptance criteria for Code, specification and acceptance-criteria application without
exceeding authorization for; repeat or confirm the test only after controls are valid.
B. Repeat the test until a passing result is obtained and discard the earlier inconsistent results.
C. Report only the final indication and omit the conditions that may have affected the test.
D. Ignore equipment or environmental checks when the operator is experienced with the method.
Correct Answer: A
Explanation: The best answer verifies Code, specification and acceptance-criteria application without exceeding authorization against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 3 open item(s), 3 supporting record(s), and a 13-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
9. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Equipment calibration, reference standards, control checks and traceable
records through realistic radiographic? Case EB-2707-0009: 9 checks are complete, 4 item(s) remain open, 7 supporting record(s) are available, the last review
was 17 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 11 unit(s).
A. Adjust an input until the result falls within the target range, then record only the final value.
B. Proceed using an estimate even though the approved method and current inputs are available.
C. Recheck the inputs, units, assumptions, and limits for Equipment calibration, reference standards, control checks and traceable records through; recalculate
independently and document the verified result before proceeding.
D. Select the most favorable result from repeated calculations without investigating the variation.
Correct Answer: C
Explanation: The best answer verifies Equipment calibration, reference standards, control checks and traceable records against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 4 open item(s), 7 supporting record(s), and a 11-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
10. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Contrast agents, physiologic monitoring and response to adverse
reactions where applicable with emphasis on? Case EB-2707-0010: 7 checks are complete, 1 item(s) remain open, 4 supporting record(s) are available, the
last review was 6 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 9 unit(s).
A. Ignore equipment or environmental checks when the operator is experienced with the method.
B. Verify the procedure, equipment status, environmental conditions, and acceptance criteria for Contrast agents, physiologic monitoring and response to
adverse reactions where applicable; repeat or confirm the test only after controls are valid.
C. Accept the result if it matches the expected outcome, even when a control check is invalid.
D. Use an expired or unverified reference because the difference is expected to be small.
Correct Answer: B
Explanation: The best answer verifies Contrast agents, physiologic monitoring and response to adverse reactions where against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 1 open item(s), 4 supporting record(s), and a 9-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
British Institute of Non-Destructive Testing PCN Radiographic Testing Level 2 Examination
Page 3
, 11. A reviewer finds conflicting evidence about X-ray and gamma-ray production, energy and material attenuation for defensible calculations and
documentation in during a pre-task planning review. What should happen first? Case EB-2707-0011: 5 checks are complete, 2 item(s) remain open, 1
supporting record(s) are available, the last review was 19 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 7 unit(s).
A. Proceed using an estimate even though the approved method and current inputs are available.
B. Confirm source data and allowable limits for X-ray and gamma-ray production, energy and material attenuation for defensible calculations, repeat the
calculation with an independent check, and resolve any difference before acceptance.
C. Adjust an input until the result falls within the target range, then record only the final value.
D. Average the conflicting results and accept the midpoint without checking the source data.
Correct Answer: B
Explanation: The best answer verifies X-ray and gamma-ray production, energy and material attenuation for defensible against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 2 open item(s), 1 supporting record(s), and a 7-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
12. A reviewer finds conflicting evidence about Geometric unsharpness, source size, distance and exposure geometry including recognition of abnormal or
during a pre-task planning review. What should happen first? Case EB-2707-0012: 3 checks are complete, 3 item(s) remain open, 5 supporting record(s) are
available, the last review was 8 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 5 unit(s).
A. Use the previous calculation unchanged even though one or more current inputs have changed.
B. Ignore unit or assumption differences if the final number appears reasonable.
C. Confirm source data and allowable limits for Geometric unsharpness, source size, distance and exposure geometry including recognition of, repeat the
calculation with an independent check, and resolve any difference before acceptance.
D. Adjust an input until the result falls within the target range, then record only the final value.
Correct Answer: C
Explanation: The best answer verifies Geometric unsharpness, source size, distance and exposure geometry including against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 3 open item(s), 5 supporting record(s), and a 5-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
13. A reviewer finds conflicting evidence about Film or digital detector characteristics, image quality and processing to support reliable, ethical radiographic
during a pre-task planning review. What should happen first? Case EB-2707-0013: 10 checks are complete, 4 item(s) remain open, 2 supporting record(s) are
available, the last review was 21 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 3 unit(s).
A. Repeat the test until a passing result is obtained and discard the earlier inconsistent results.
B. Check calibration and method controls affecting Film or digital detector characteristics, image quality and processing to support reliable, investigate the
unexpected indication or result, and document a defensible disposition.
C. Report only the final indication and omit the conditions that may have affected the test.
D. Ignore equipment or environmental checks when the operator is experienced with the method.
Correct Answer: B
Explanation: The best answer verifies Film or digital detector characteristics, image quality and processing to support against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 4 open item(s), 2 supporting record(s), and a 3-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
14. A reviewer finds conflicting evidence about Image-quality indicators, density, sensitivity and acceptance checks integrated across the tasks expected in
during a pre-task planning review. What should happen first? Case EB-2707-0014: 8 checks are complete, 1 item(s) remain open, 6 supporting record(s) are
available, the last review was 10 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 1 unit(s).
A. Change the test sensitivity or acceptance limit without authorization to reduce false indications.
B. Check calibration and method controls affecting Image-quality indicators, density, sensitivity and acceptance checks integrated across the, investigate the
unexpected indication or result, and document a defensible disposition.
C. Use an expired or unverified reference because the difference is expected to be small.
D. Report only the final indication and omit the conditions that may have affected the test.
Correct Answer: B
Explanation: The best answer verifies Image-quality indicators, density, sensitivity and acceptance checks integrated across against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 1 open item(s), 6 supporting record(s), and a 1-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
15. A reviewer finds conflicting evidence about Radiographic technique selection for welds, castings and complex geometry within the radiographic testing
during a pre-task planning review. What should happen first? Case EB-2707-0015: 6 checks are complete, 2 item(s) remain open, 3 supporting record(s) are
available, the last review was 23 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 18 unit(s).
A. Ignore equipment or environmental checks when the operator is experienced with the method.
B. Accept the result if it matches the expected outcome, even when a control check is invalid.
C. Check calibration and method controls affecting Radiographic technique selection for welds, castings and complex geometry within the, investigate the
unexpected indication or result, and document a defensible disposition.
D. Use an expired or unverified reference because the difference is expected to be small.
Correct Answer: C
Explanation: The best answer verifies Radiographic technique selection for welds, castings and complex geometry within the against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 2 open item(s), 3 supporting record(s), and a 18-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
British Institute of Non-Destructive Testing PCN Radiographic Testing Level 2 Examination
Page 4
Radiographic Testing Level 2 Examination
,1. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving X-ray and gamma-ray production, energy and material attenuation for
defensible calculations and documentation in? Case EB-2707-0001: 7 checks are complete, 4 item(s) remain open, 3 supporting record(s) are available, the
last review was 9 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 8 unit(s).
A. Use the previous calculation unchanged even though one or more current inputs have changed.
B. Ignore unit or assumption differences if the final number appears reasonable.
C. Recheck the inputs, units, assumptions, and limits for X-ray and gamma-ray production, energy and material attenuation for defensible calculations;
recalculate independently and document the verified result before proceeding.
D. Adjust an input until the result falls within the target range, then record only the final value.
Correct Answer: C
Explanation: The best answer verifies X-ray and gamma-ray production, energy and material attenuation for defensible against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 4 open item(s), 3 supporting record(s), and a 8-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
2. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Geometric unsharpness, source size, distance and exposure geometry
including recognition of abnormal or? Case EB-2707-0002: 5 checks are complete, 1 item(s) remain open, 7 supporting record(s) are available, the last review
was 22 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 6 unit(s).
A. Average the conflicting results and accept the midpoint without checking the source data.
B. Recheck the inputs, units, assumptions, and limits for Geometric unsharpness, source size, distance and exposure geometry including recognition of;
recalculate independently and document the verified result before proceeding.
C. Select the most favorable result from repeated calculations without investigating the variation.
D. Ignore unit or assumption differences if the final number appears reasonable.
Correct Answer: B
Explanation: The best answer verifies Geometric unsharpness, source size, distance and exposure geometry including against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 1 open item(s), 7 supporting record(s), and a 6-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
3. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Film or digital detector characteristics, image quality and processing to
support reliable, ethical radiographic? Case EB-2707-0003: 3 checks are complete, 2 item(s) remain open, 4 supporting record(s) are available, the last review
was 11 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 4 unit(s).
A. Verify the procedure, equipment status, environmental conditions, and acceptance criteria for Film or digital detector characteristics, image quality and
processing to support reliable; repeat or confirm the test only after controls are valid.
B. Change the test sensitivity or acceptance limit without authorization to reduce false indications.
C. Use an expired or unverified reference because the difference is expected to be small.
D. Report only the final indication and omit the conditions that may have affected the test.
Correct Answer: A
Explanation: The best answer verifies Film or digital detector characteristics, image quality and processing to support against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 2 open item(s), 4 supporting record(s), and a 4-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
4. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Image-quality indicators, density, sensitivity and acceptance checks
integrated across the tasks expected in? Case EB-2707-0004: 10 checks are complete, 3 item(s) remain open, 1 supporting record(s) are available, the last
review was 24 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 2 unit(s).
A. Ignore equipment or environmental checks when the operator is experienced with the method.
B. Accept the result if it matches the expected outcome, even when a control check is invalid.
C. Use an expired or unverified reference because the difference is expected to be small.
D. Verify the procedure, equipment status, environmental conditions, and acceptance criteria for Image-quality indicators, density, sensitivity and acceptance
checks integrated across the; repeat or confirm the test only after controls are valid.
Correct Answer: D
Explanation: The best answer verifies Image-quality indicators, density, sensitivity and acceptance checks integrated across against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 3 open item(s), 1 supporting record(s), and a 2-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
5. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Radiographic technique selection for welds, castings and complex
geometry within the radiographic testing? Case EB-2707-0005: 8 checks are complete, 4 item(s) remain open, 5 supporting record(s) are available, the last
review was 13 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 19 unit(s).
A. Report only the final indication and omit the conditions that may have affected the test.
B. Repeat the test until a passing result is obtained and discard the earlier inconsistent results.
C. Verify the procedure, equipment status, environmental conditions, and acceptance criteria for Radiographic technique selection for welds, castings and
complex geometry within the; repeat or confirm the test only after controls are valid.
D. Accept the result if it matches the expected outcome, even when a control check is invalid.
Correct Answer: C
Explanation: The best answer verifies Radiographic technique selection for welds, castings and complex geometry within the against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 4 open item(s), 5 supporting record(s), and a 19-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
British Institute of Non-Destructive Testing PCN Radiographic Testing Level 2 Examination
Page 2
,6. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Interpretation of volumetric and planar discontinuity images as applied to
radiographic testing? Case EB-2707-0006: 6 checks are complete, 1 item(s) remain open, 2 supporting record(s) are available, the last review was 2 hour(s)
ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 17 unit(s).
A. Use an expired or unverified reference because the difference is expected to be small.
B. Change the test sensitivity or acceptance limit without authorization to reduce false indications.
C. Repeat the test until a passing result is obtained and discard the earlier inconsistent results.
D. Verify the procedure, equipment status, environmental conditions, and acceptance criteria for Interpretation of volumetric and planar discontinuity images as
applied to radiographic; repeat or confirm the test only after controls are valid.
Correct Answer: D
Explanation: The best answer verifies Interpretation of volumetric and planar discontinuity images as applied to radiographic against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 1 open item(s), 2 supporting record(s), and a 17-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
7. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Scatter control, screens, collimation and artifact recognition with
decisions and evidence relevant to radiographic? Case EB-2707-0007: 4 checks are complete, 2 item(s) remain open, 6 supporting record(s) are available, the
last review was 15 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 15 unit(s).
A. Verify the procedure, equipment status, environmental conditions, and acceptance criteria for Scatter control, screens, collimation and artifact recognition
with decisions and evidence; repeat or confirm the test only after controls are valid.
B. Accept the result if it matches the expected outcome, even when a control check is invalid.
C. Ignore equipment or environmental checks when the operator is experienced with the method.
D. Change the test sensitivity or acceptance limit without authorization to reduce false indications.
Correct Answer: A
Explanation: The best answer verifies Scatter control, screens, collimation and artifact recognition with decisions and against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 2 open item(s), 6 supporting record(s), and a 15-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
8. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Code, specification and acceptance-criteria application without
exceeding authorization for safe, accurate work in? Case EB-2707-0008: 2 checks are complete, 3 item(s) remain open, 3 supporting record(s) are available,
the last review was 4 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 13 unit(s).
A. Verify the procedure, equipment status, environmental conditions, and acceptance criteria for Code, specification and acceptance-criteria application without
exceeding authorization for; repeat or confirm the test only after controls are valid.
B. Repeat the test until a passing result is obtained and discard the earlier inconsistent results.
C. Report only the final indication and omit the conditions that may have affected the test.
D. Ignore equipment or environmental checks when the operator is experienced with the method.
Correct Answer: A
Explanation: The best answer verifies Code, specification and acceptance-criteria application without exceeding authorization against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 3 open item(s), 3 supporting record(s), and a 13-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
9. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Equipment calibration, reference standards, control checks and traceable
records through realistic radiographic? Case EB-2707-0009: 9 checks are complete, 4 item(s) remain open, 7 supporting record(s) are available, the last review
was 17 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 11 unit(s).
A. Adjust an input until the result falls within the target range, then record only the final value.
B. Proceed using an estimate even though the approved method and current inputs are available.
C. Recheck the inputs, units, assumptions, and limits for Equipment calibration, reference standards, control checks and traceable records through; recalculate
independently and document the verified result before proceeding.
D. Select the most favorable result from repeated calculations without investigating the variation.
Correct Answer: C
Explanation: The best answer verifies Equipment calibration, reference standards, control checks and traceable records against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 4 open item(s), 7 supporting record(s), and a 11-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
10. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Contrast agents, physiologic monitoring and response to adverse
reactions where applicable with emphasis on? Case EB-2707-0010: 7 checks are complete, 1 item(s) remain open, 4 supporting record(s) are available, the
last review was 6 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 9 unit(s).
A. Ignore equipment or environmental checks when the operator is experienced with the method.
B. Verify the procedure, equipment status, environmental conditions, and acceptance criteria for Contrast agents, physiologic monitoring and response to
adverse reactions where applicable; repeat or confirm the test only after controls are valid.
C. Accept the result if it matches the expected outcome, even when a control check is invalid.
D. Use an expired or unverified reference because the difference is expected to be small.
Correct Answer: B
Explanation: The best answer verifies Contrast agents, physiologic monitoring and response to adverse reactions where against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 1 open item(s), 4 supporting record(s), and a 9-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
British Institute of Non-Destructive Testing PCN Radiographic Testing Level 2 Examination
Page 3
, 11. A reviewer finds conflicting evidence about X-ray and gamma-ray production, energy and material attenuation for defensible calculations and
documentation in during a pre-task planning review. What should happen first? Case EB-2707-0011: 5 checks are complete, 2 item(s) remain open, 1
supporting record(s) are available, the last review was 19 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 7 unit(s).
A. Proceed using an estimate even though the approved method and current inputs are available.
B. Confirm source data and allowable limits for X-ray and gamma-ray production, energy and material attenuation for defensible calculations, repeat the
calculation with an independent check, and resolve any difference before acceptance.
C. Adjust an input until the result falls within the target range, then record only the final value.
D. Average the conflicting results and accept the midpoint without checking the source data.
Correct Answer: B
Explanation: The best answer verifies X-ray and gamma-ray production, energy and material attenuation for defensible against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 2 open item(s), 1 supporting record(s), and a 7-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
12. A reviewer finds conflicting evidence about Geometric unsharpness, source size, distance and exposure geometry including recognition of abnormal or
during a pre-task planning review. What should happen first? Case EB-2707-0012: 3 checks are complete, 3 item(s) remain open, 5 supporting record(s) are
available, the last review was 8 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 5 unit(s).
A. Use the previous calculation unchanged even though one or more current inputs have changed.
B. Ignore unit or assumption differences if the final number appears reasonable.
C. Confirm source data and allowable limits for Geometric unsharpness, source size, distance and exposure geometry including recognition of, repeat the
calculation with an independent check, and resolve any difference before acceptance.
D. Adjust an input until the result falls within the target range, then record only the final value.
Correct Answer: C
Explanation: The best answer verifies Geometric unsharpness, source size, distance and exposure geometry including against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 3 open item(s), 5 supporting record(s), and a 5-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
13. A reviewer finds conflicting evidence about Film or digital detector characteristics, image quality and processing to support reliable, ethical radiographic
during a pre-task planning review. What should happen first? Case EB-2707-0013: 10 checks are complete, 4 item(s) remain open, 2 supporting record(s) are
available, the last review was 21 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 3 unit(s).
A. Repeat the test until a passing result is obtained and discard the earlier inconsistent results.
B. Check calibration and method controls affecting Film or digital detector characteristics, image quality and processing to support reliable, investigate the
unexpected indication or result, and document a defensible disposition.
C. Report only the final indication and omit the conditions that may have affected the test.
D. Ignore equipment or environmental checks when the operator is experienced with the method.
Correct Answer: B
Explanation: The best answer verifies Film or digital detector characteristics, image quality and processing to support against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 4 open item(s), 2 supporting record(s), and a 3-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
14. A reviewer finds conflicting evidence about Image-quality indicators, density, sensitivity and acceptance checks integrated across the tasks expected in
during a pre-task planning review. What should happen first? Case EB-2707-0014: 8 checks are complete, 1 item(s) remain open, 6 supporting record(s) are
available, the last review was 10 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 1 unit(s).
A. Change the test sensitivity or acceptance limit without authorization to reduce false indications.
B. Check calibration and method controls affecting Image-quality indicators, density, sensitivity and acceptance checks integrated across the, investigate the
unexpected indication or result, and document a defensible disposition.
C. Use an expired or unverified reference because the difference is expected to be small.
D. Report only the final indication and omit the conditions that may have affected the test.
Correct Answer: B
Explanation: The best answer verifies Image-quality indicators, density, sensitivity and acceptance checks integrated across against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 1 open item(s), 6 supporting record(s), and a 1-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
15. A reviewer finds conflicting evidence about Radiographic technique selection for welds, castings and complex geometry within the radiographic testing
during a pre-task planning review. What should happen first? Case EB-2707-0015: 6 checks are complete, 2 item(s) remain open, 3 supporting record(s) are
available, the last review was 23 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 18 unit(s).
A. Ignore equipment or environmental checks when the operator is experienced with the method.
B. Accept the result if it matches the expected outcome, even when a control check is invalid.
C. Check calibration and method controls affecting Radiographic technique selection for welds, castings and complex geometry within the, investigate the
unexpected indication or result, and document a defensible disposition.
D. Use an expired or unverified reference because the difference is expected to be small.
Correct Answer: C
Explanation: The best answer verifies Radiographic technique selection for welds, castings and complex geometry within the against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 2 open item(s), 3 supporting record(s), and a 18-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
British Institute of Non-Destructive Testing PCN Radiographic Testing Level 2 Examination
Page 4
