• ¿Documento equivocado? Cámbialo gratis
  • Escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron
  • Inmediatamente disponible después del pago
  • Leer en línea o como PDF
Vender
¿Dónde estudias?
Tu idioma
Document preview thumbnail
Vista previa 3 fuera de 24 páginas
Examen

WGU C845 VUN1 Task 1 | Passed on First Attempt |Latest Update with Complete Solution

Document preview thumbnail
Vista previa 3 fuera de 24 páginas

WGU C845 VUN1 Task 1 | Passed on First Attempt |Latest Update with Complete Solution

Vista previa del contenido

WGU C845 VUN1 Task 1 | Passed on First
Attempt |Latest Update with Complete Solution




VUN1 — VUN1 Task 1: Managing Security Operations and Access Controls
Information Systems Security - C845




A. Apply an Access Control Model
A.1. Chosen Access Control Model
I have chosen the Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) model. The principles of RBAC are:

• Role Assignment: A user is assigned to a role based on their job function (e.g., "Finance
Analyst").
• Permission Assignment: Permissions to perform operations on systems are assigned to roles,
not to individual users.
• Session Management: A user activates a role to gain the associated permissions for a session.
• Least Privilege: Users should only have the minimum level of access necessary to perform their
job duties.

The organization's access control structure, as seen in the user matrix, is implicitly role-based (e.g.,
"Finance manager," "HR coordinator"). Applying a formal RBAC model would streamline this by ensuring
permissions are strictly tied to business functions, reducing complexity and the potential for user error
when assigning permissions.

A.2. Four Misalignments with RBAC Principles
1. Misalignment 1: Privilege Escalation Beyond Role Scope
• Description: The "Junior system admin" (J. Lopez) has "Domain admin" privileges. A
junior role should not have the highest level of access in a Windows environment.
• Conflict with RBAC: This violates the principle of least privilege. The role "Junior system
admin" implies a subset of administrative duties, not unrestricted domain-wide control.
2. Misalignment 2: Unnecessary Access Across Departments
• Description: The "Finance analyst" (L. Cheng) has "Full access" to the CRM, a system


Downloaded by Great Mind ()

, primarily for Sales and Support. A finance role typically does not require full modification
rights in a customer relationship system.
• Conflict with RBAC: This violates least privilege and separation of duties. It allows for
potential data manipulation outside the user's core business function.
3. Misalignment 3: Violation of User-Role Assignment Post-Termination
• Description: The "HR assistant" (P. Ellis), who was terminated on 2025-05-20, has an
"Active" account status and successfully logged in on 2025-06-29.
• Conflict with RBAC: RBAC requires timely revocation of role assignments upon a change
in employment status. An active session for a terminated user completely bypasses the
security provided by the role structure.
4. Misalignment 4: Overly Broad Privileged Access
• Description: The "IT administrator" (T. Miller) has "Full admin" access to "All internal
systems," and the log shows they made a firewall rule change without a ticket_id.
• Conflict with RBAC: While some access is necessary, blanket "Full admin" access
violates least privilege and impedes accountability. It does not segment duties within the
IT department itself.




Downloaded by Great Mind ()

, A.3. Recommended Changes to Resolve Misalignments i i i i i i




1. Recommendation1:Implement PrivilegeTieringforAdministrativeRoles i i


• Justification: Following the CIS Control 5 (Account Management) and t
i i ii i i i i i i i i i i i i ii


he principle of
ii i i


least privilege,administrativeaccountsshouldbesegregated.The"Juniorsystemadmin"
j ii


role should be assigned amorerestricted setofprivileges, such as "Server Operator
ii ii i i i i ii ii ii ii ii


" or "Help Desk Administrator," which allows for daily tasks without granting domai
ii i i ii ii ii ii ii ii ii ii ii ii


n-wide control (NIST SP 800-53, AC-6).
i i i i i i i i i i


2. Recommendation2:Conduct aRole-PermissionReview andRemediation j


• Justification: Align with ISO/IEC 27001:2022, A.5.35 i i


(Access control) by performing a formal i i i i ii


reviewofall role assignments.Remove accessto systemslikethe ii


CRM from
the "Financeanalyst"roleunlessacompellingbusinessjustificationexists. ii


Accessshouldbe based on documented job requirements. ii i i i i i i i i


3. Recommendation3:AutomateAccessRevocationandEnforceChangeManagement
• Justification:PerNISTSP800-53,AC-
2(AccountManagement),accountrevocationmust occur immediately upon terminati ii i i i i i i


on. This should be an automated part of the HR offboarding process. Further
i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i ii i i i i i i


more, all changes, including firewall modifications, must require aticket IDfor app
i i i i i i i i ii i i i i i ii i ii


rovaland auditing (CIS Control10- MalwareDefenses, relying on change management).
i i i ii i i ii i ii ii i i ii




A.4. Revised User Role Matrix ii ii ii




TherevisedmatrixreflectsastricterRBACimplementation.Keychangesare bolded.

Role Assigned User ii SystemAccess PrivilegeLevel(Revised)
Finance Manager
ii A. Jones ii Payrollsystem,budget tr ii Fullaccess
acker
Financeanalyst L.Cheng i Payrollsystem,budget tr ii Readandwrite(CRM acce ii


acker ssremoved) i


HRcoordinator
i M.Singh HRportal,payroll system ii Readandwrite
Security Analyst
ii K.Patel i SIEM,networklogs, firewall Readonly ii


console
ITadministrator
i T.Miller Allinternalsystems Fulladmin
Juniorsystemadmin J.Lopez
i Domaincontroller,all intern ServerOperator ii i ii


al systems ii (Domain Admi ii


n
removed)
Customersupportrep R.Davis i CRM,emailserver i Readonly i



Customersupportrep J.Halli CRM,emailserver i i Read only (Payroll system
ii i i ii


access removed) j


Externalauditor D.Nguyen Budgettracker Readonly




DownloadediibyiiGreatiiMindii()

Información del documento

Subido en
7 de agosto de 2026
Número de páginas
24
Escrito en
2026/2027
Tipo
Examen
Contiene
Preguntas y respuestas
$16.49

¿Documento equivocado? Cámbialo gratis Dentro de los 14 días posteriores a la compra y antes de descargarlo, puedes elegir otro documento. Puedes gastar el importe de nuevo.
Escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron
Inmediatamente disponible después del pago
Leer en línea o como PDF

Seller avatar
Los indicadores de reputación están sujetos a la cantidad de artículos vendidos por una tarifa y las reseñas que ha recibido por esos documentos. Hay tres niveles: Bronce, Plata y Oro. Cuanto mayor reputación, más podrás confiar en la calidad del trabajo del vendedor.
favouredone
4.4
(352)
Vendido
401
Seguidores
36
Artículos
10284
Última venta
5 días hace



Por qué los estudiantes eligen Stuvia

Creado por compañeros estudiantes, verificado por reseñas

Calidad en la que puedes confiar: escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron y evaluado por otros que han usado estos resúmenes.

¿No estás satisfecho? Elige otro documento

¡No te preocupes! Puedes elegir directamente otro documento que se ajuste mejor a lo que buscas.

Paga como quieras, empieza a estudiar al instante

Sin suscripción, sin compromisos. Paga como estés acostumbrado con tarjeta de crédito y descarga tu documento PDF inmediatamente.

Student with book image

“Comprado, descargado y aprobado. Así de fácil puede ser.”

Alisha Student

Preguntas frecuentes