Escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron Inmediatamente disponible después del pago Leer en línea o como PDF ¿Documento equivocado? Cámbialo gratis 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Document preview thumbnail
Vista previa 3 fuera de 18 páginas
Notas de lectura

Class notes Criminal Law

Document preview thumbnail
Vista previa 3 fuera de 18 páginas

These are my class notes from Criminal Law in the year 2019 (semester 2). I passed this course with an 8.

Vista previa del contenido

Global Law Criminal Law (2018-2019, semester 2)
Lecture 1: What is criminal law?
Substantive criminal law = field of law that determines which facts are criminal
 Protects legal interests such as life
 Also used as a form of governance to regulate minor wrongs
 Mala in se v mala prohibita

Procedural criminal law = formal rules to enforce substantive criminal law
 Contains rules that regulate: investigation (searches, witnesses interrogations), trial,
appeal

Who makes criminal law?
 State/federal legislator
 Lower legislators (municipalities)
 Supranational intstitutions (EU)
 Criminal courts (common law)

Main sources of criminal law
 Criminal codes
 Acts of parliament/congress
 Case law
 Doctrine

Criminal law is an ultimate remedy/last resort -- and must be proportionate

Criminal courts
a. lower courts
b. courts of appeal
c. supreme court

Functions of criminal law
 Declaratory = values of society
 Preventative = punishment may keep people from committing crime
 Censuring = signalling certain behavior as wrong

Why punish
 Retributive theory
- proportionality
- you committed a wrong, state can wrong you by punishing you
 Utilitarian theory
- focus on future
- cannot inflict harm while in prison
- rehabilitation
 Mixed theory: combination of deterrence and rehabilitation

Conditions for criminal liability
1. act (actus reus)
- certain age (criminal capacity)
- willed voluntary act


1

,- actus reus = legal definition of a criminal offense in a certain country
- omission may count when there is a duty to act
2. causation
- conditio sine qua non
- proximate cause
- adequation (foreseeable)
What factor is more important in contributing to the crime? More factors
but for- test
3. fault (mens rea)
= intentionally
4. wrongdoing (no justification)
e.g. necessity or self-defense
still harmful, but no longer considered wrong
5. blameworthiness (no excuse)
e.g. duress or involuntary intoxication
if there is a legal excuse, defendant is no longer blameworthy

Scope of criminal liability
- justification (act is not wrongful)
- excuse (actor not culpable)
 Broadening criminal liability
- inchoate offenses (=just begun and so not fully formed or developed; rudimentary)
- complicity

Jurisdiction
- nationality, territoriality, universal
- territorial jurisdiction has priority --> sovereignty (includes vessels, airplanes ships)
Requirement of double criminality (is a crime in both jurisdictions)
If something is not a crime in a country, they cannot claim jurisdiction




2

, Lecture 2: Criminalization and decriminalization
Criteria act must be harmful AND wrong

POLITICS

Why?
- principle of legality
- criminal law is the most coercive state instrument

THEORIES OF CRIMINALIZATION
 Utilitarian
= for the greater good
 Law & economics
= cost/benefit analysis
 Legal moralism
= criminalization of immoral conduct

HARM
- Prevent harm to others
o Individual autonomy
o Welfare, part of a community
- BALANCING ANALYSIS* : greater the gravity and likelihood of harm the strong the case in favour of
criminalisation (like terrorism), the more valuable conduct is , or the more prohibition woud limit
liberty the stonger the case against criminalisation ( so like since privacy violation is als harm)

Public wrongfulness : legal moralism theory
- a crime against one as a crime against all
- Can be controversial

comparison between criminal and civil law: criminal is only about PUBLIC wrongs so we get that civil
law is going to be more broad than criminal law

No objective criteria: criminalisation is a balancing act
- Harm and wrong are threshold criteria
Secondary (or moderating) criteria:
• Proportionality
- retrospective: punishment should fit the crime
- prospective response should fit the act (warrants a criminal law response?)
--> standard harm analysis*
• Subsidiarity
- criminal law last resort --> alternatives tort law, tax law
• Effectiveness
– Prosecutability
– Chance of detection & capacity of criminal justice system
– Deterrent effect




3

Información del documento

Estudio
Subido en
11 de mayo de 2021
Número de páginas
18
Escrito en
2018/2019
Tipo
Notas de lectura
Profesor(es)
S. walther
Contiene
Todas las clases
$4.78

¿Documento equivocado? Cámbialo gratis Dentro de los 14 días posteriores a la compra y antes de descargarlo, puedes elegir otro documento. Puedes gastar el importe de nuevo.
Escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron
Inmediatamente disponible después del pago
Leer en línea o como PDF

Seller avatar
Los indicadores de reputación están sujetos a la cantidad de artículos vendidos por una tarifa y las reseñas que ha recibido por esos documentos. Hay tres niveles: Bronce, Plata y Oro. Cuanto mayor reputación, más podrás confiar en la calidad del trabajo del vendedor.
sissihuys
2.5
(2)
Vendido
21
Seguidores
16
Artículos
12
Última venta
3 año hace



Por qué los estudiantes eligen Stuvia

Creado por compañeros estudiantes, verificado por reseñas

Calidad en la que puedes confiar: escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron y evaluado por otros que han usado estos resúmenes.

¿No estás satisfecho? Elige otro documento

¡No te preocupes! Puedes elegir directamente otro documento que se ajuste mejor a lo que buscas.

Paga como quieras, empieza a estudiar al instante

Sin suscripción, sin compromisos. Paga como estés acostumbrado con tarjeta de crédito y descarga tu documento PDF inmediatamente.

Student with book image

“Comprado, descargado y aprobado. Así de fácil puede ser.”

Alisha Student

Preguntas frecuentes