4/10/23, 8:31 AM WGU Performance Assessment
NQM1 — NQM1 TASK 1: CAPSTONE PROJECT—
COMPREHENSIVE HEALTHCARE CHANGE PROPOSAL
BSNU CAPSTONE — D226
PRFA — NQM1
TASK OVERVIEW SUBMISSIONS EVALUATION REPORT
EVALUATION REPORT — ATTEMPT 1 — REVISION NEEDED
Overall Evaluator Comments
EVALUATOR COMMENTS
You have done a terrific job discussing your proposed change of implementing telemedicine for chronic conditions,
which you proposed to your sponsor. You keenly discussed the benefits of having telemedicine for patients with
chronic conditions, noting that it decreases re-admission rates and be cost saving for the patients. You have
suggested valid stakeholders, including the patients and hospital staff. You wisely addressed potential plans for
expansion, including expanding to other organizations. Please review the rubric below for aspects requiring
additional information.
A1. Innovative Change
Competent The proposal for 1 healthcare change is innovative, is value based, and affects patient outcomes.
There are no comments for this aspect.
A1a. Authorized Proposed Change
Not Evident The “Professional Verification Form” is not provided.
EVALUATOR COMMENTS: ATTEMPT 1
An insightful discussion is provided on a proposed change of using telemedicine for patients with chronic
conditions. A completed Professional Verification FOrm could not be located.
A1b. Organizational Sponsor Discussion
This study source was downloaded by 1309158 from cliffsnotes.com on 02-28-2026 11:20:40 GMT -06:00
https://tasks.wgu.edu/student/010252143/course/22340015/task/3312/evaluation-report 1/6
https://www.cliffsnotes.com//study-notes/15181265
, 4/10/23, 8:31 AM WGU Performance Assessment
Competent The summary describes the main points of the discussion between the learner and the learner’s
organizational sponsor, including sponsor feedback received.
There are no comments for this aspect.
A1c. Proposed Changes
Competent The explanation logically addresses any changes made to the proposed change and why each change
was needed, or the explanation logically addresses why no changes were needed. The explanation is based on the
sponsor’s feedback.
There are no comments for this aspect.
A2. Data to Support the Need for Change
Competent The organizational, local, or national data provided logically support the need for the proposed
change.
There are no comments for this aspect.
A3. Change Barriers
Competent The description addresses 2 barriers that would each feasibly hinder the proposed change.
There are no comments for this aspect.
A4. Potential Negative Outcome
Competent The discussion logically addresses a potential negative outcome of the proposed change not being
implemented that is relevant to that change.
There are no comments for this aspect.
A4a. Potential Action
Competent The discussion identifies a feasible and appropriate potential action that could be taken and logically
addresses how the action would benefit the proposed change if there is a lack of support for the change.
There are no comments for this aspect.
This study source was downloaded by 1309158 from cliffsnotes.com on 02-28-2026 11:20:40 GMT -06:00
https://tasks.wgu.edu/student/010252143/course/22340015/task/3312/evaluation-report 2/6
https://www.cliffsnotes.com//study-notes/15181265
NQM1 — NQM1 TASK 1: CAPSTONE PROJECT—
COMPREHENSIVE HEALTHCARE CHANGE PROPOSAL
BSNU CAPSTONE — D226
PRFA — NQM1
TASK OVERVIEW SUBMISSIONS EVALUATION REPORT
EVALUATION REPORT — ATTEMPT 1 — REVISION NEEDED
Overall Evaluator Comments
EVALUATOR COMMENTS
You have done a terrific job discussing your proposed change of implementing telemedicine for chronic conditions,
which you proposed to your sponsor. You keenly discussed the benefits of having telemedicine for patients with
chronic conditions, noting that it decreases re-admission rates and be cost saving for the patients. You have
suggested valid stakeholders, including the patients and hospital staff. You wisely addressed potential plans for
expansion, including expanding to other organizations. Please review the rubric below for aspects requiring
additional information.
A1. Innovative Change
Competent The proposal for 1 healthcare change is innovative, is value based, and affects patient outcomes.
There are no comments for this aspect.
A1a. Authorized Proposed Change
Not Evident The “Professional Verification Form” is not provided.
EVALUATOR COMMENTS: ATTEMPT 1
An insightful discussion is provided on a proposed change of using telemedicine for patients with chronic
conditions. A completed Professional Verification FOrm could not be located.
A1b. Organizational Sponsor Discussion
This study source was downloaded by 1309158 from cliffsnotes.com on 02-28-2026 11:20:40 GMT -06:00
https://tasks.wgu.edu/student/010252143/course/22340015/task/3312/evaluation-report 1/6
https://www.cliffsnotes.com//study-notes/15181265
, 4/10/23, 8:31 AM WGU Performance Assessment
Competent The summary describes the main points of the discussion between the learner and the learner’s
organizational sponsor, including sponsor feedback received.
There are no comments for this aspect.
A1c. Proposed Changes
Competent The explanation logically addresses any changes made to the proposed change and why each change
was needed, or the explanation logically addresses why no changes were needed. The explanation is based on the
sponsor’s feedback.
There are no comments for this aspect.
A2. Data to Support the Need for Change
Competent The organizational, local, or national data provided logically support the need for the proposed
change.
There are no comments for this aspect.
A3. Change Barriers
Competent The description addresses 2 barriers that would each feasibly hinder the proposed change.
There are no comments for this aspect.
A4. Potential Negative Outcome
Competent The discussion logically addresses a potential negative outcome of the proposed change not being
implemented that is relevant to that change.
There are no comments for this aspect.
A4a. Potential Action
Competent The discussion identifies a feasible and appropriate potential action that could be taken and logically
addresses how the action would benefit the proposed change if there is a lack of support for the change.
There are no comments for this aspect.
This study source was downloaded by 1309158 from cliffsnotes.com on 02-28-2026 11:20:40 GMT -06:00
https://tasks.wgu.edu/student/010252143/course/22340015/task/3312/evaluation-report 2/6
https://www.cliffsnotes.com//study-notes/15181265
