MRL3701 Insolvency Law

MRL3701 Assignment 1 Semester 2 - 2023 Epstein v Epstein 1987 (4) SA 606 (C) Pretorius’ Trustee v Van Blommenstein 1949 (1) SA 267 (O) Magnum Financial Holdings (PTY) Ltd (In Litigation) v Summerly and Another NNO 1984 (1) SA 160 (W) Prinsloo en ‘n Ander v Van Zyl NO 1967 (1) SA 581 (T)

MRL3701 - ASSIGNMENT 1 SOLUTONS (SEMESTER 02 - 2023)

MRL3701 - ASSIGNMENT 1 SOLUTIONS (SEMESTER 02 - 2023)

MRL3701 - ASSIGNMENT 1 SOLUTIONS (SEMESTER 02 - 2023)

A detailed summary of all the course work covered in semester one.

the document has the latest questions and elaborate answers

Question and Answers from previous exams and assignments for Insolvency Law. Guarantee Pass

MRL3701 - PAST EXAM SOLUTION NOTES

MRL3701 PORTFOLIO MEMO - MAY/JUNE 2023 - SEMESTER 1 - UNISA - (DETAILED ANSWERS WITH FOOTNOTES - DISTINCTION GUARANTEED!) Question 1 1.1 Explain the purpose of a sequestration order. (5) 1.2 “A sequestration order may not be granted if a debtor has only one creditor and there are not enough assets to cover the costs of sequestration.” Indicate whether this statement is true or false, and then provide the reasons for your answer. (5) 1.3 David approaches you for advice. He inform...

ANSWERS/ SOLUTIONS WITH REFERENCES & PREVIEW: Question 1 1.1 Explain the purpose of a sequestration order. (5) 1.2 “A sequestration order may not be granted if a debtor has only one creditor and there are not enough assets to cover the costs of sequestration.” Indicate whether this statement is true or false, and then provide the reasons for your answer. (5) 1.3 David approaches you for advice. He informs you that his brother, Samuel, owes him R15 000 for painting ...