Pvl2601 cases Study guides, Study notes & Summaries

Looking for the best study guides, study notes and summaries about Pvl2601 cases? On this page you'll find 22 study documents about Pvl2601 cases.

All 22 results

Sort by

PVL2601 EXAM ANSWERS MAY/JUNE 2023 Popular
  • PVL2601 EXAM ANSWERS MAY/JUNE 2023

  • Other • 44 pages • 2023
  • PVL2601 EXAM ANSWERS MAY/JUNE 2023 QUESTIONS ASKED: Time left 1:03:40 Question 49 Not yet answered Marked out of 2.00 Not flaggedFlag question Question text In which one of the following cases did the court prohibit a retirement annuity fund from making payments to a maintenance debtor unless the Maintenance Court or the maintenance debtor's former wife consented to such payment? a. Gerber v Gerber and Pocock b. Magewu v Zozo c. Mngadi v Beacon Sweets and Chocolates Provide...
    (0)
  • R50,00
  • 2x sold
  • + learn more
PVL2601 - Summarised Cases (Bundle)
  • PVL2601 - Summarised Cases (Bundle)

  • Exam (elaborations) • 42 pages • 2021
  • Available in package deal
  • Contains Latest summaries of the following Cases in PVL2601 - Family Law: Guggenheim vs Rosenbaum; Fourie vs Minister of Home Affairs; Ex Parte Dow; Moola vs Aulsebrook; Solomons vs Abrahams; Grobbelaar vs Havenga; Peter vs Minister of Law & Order; Excell vs Douglas; Reloomel vs Ramsay; Bannatyne vs Bannatyne; Du Plesiss vs Pienaar; Nedbank vs van Zyl; Reeder vs Softline; Schwartz vs Schwartz; Swart vs Swart; Smit vs Smit; Wijker vs Wijker; Watt vs Watt; Beaumo...
    (1)
  • R80,00
  • 4x sold
  • + learn more
PVL2601 - Summarised Cases (Family Law)
  • PVL2601 - Summarised Cases (Family Law)

  • Class notes • 42 pages • 2021
  • Available in package deal
  • Contains Latest summary of the following Cases in PVL2601 - Family Law: Guggenheim vs Rosenbaum; Fourie vs Minister of Home Affairs; Ex Parte Dow; Moola vs Aulsebrook; Solomons vs Abrahams; Grobbelaar vs Havenga; Peter vs Minister of Law & Order; Excell vs Douglas; Reloomel vs Ramsay; Bannatyne vs Bannatyne; Du Plesiss vs Pienaar; Nedbank vs van Zyl; Reeder vs Softline; Schwartz vs Schwartz; Swart vs Swart; Smit vs Smit; Wijker vs Wijker; Watt vs Watt; Beaumont...
    (0)
  • R80,00
  • 2x sold
  • + learn more
PVL2601 - Summary of Cases (Family Law)
  • PVL2601 - Summary of Cases (Family Law)

  • Other • 42 pages • 2021
  • Available in package deal
  • Contains Latest Summaries of the following Cases in PVL2601 - Family Law: Guggenheim vs Rosenbaum; Fourie vs Minister of Home Affairs; Ex Parte Dow; Moola vs Aulsebrook; Solomons vs Abrahams; Grobbelaar vs Havenga; Peter vs Minister of Law & Order; Excell vs Douglas; Reloomel vs Ramsay; Bannatyne vs Bannatyne; Du Plesiss vs Pienaar; Nedbank vs van Zyl; Reeder vs Softline; Schwartz vs Schwartz; Swart vs Swart; Smit vs Smit; Wijker vs Wijker; Watt vs Watt; Beaumo...
    (0)
  • R80,00
  • 1x sold
  • + learn more
PVL2601 –  Summary  Study Notes  (Family Law)
  • PVL2601 – Summary Study Notes (Family Law)

  • Class notes • 25 pages • 2023
  • PVL2601 – Summary Study Notes (Family Law) FAMILY LAW: LEGAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE CONCLUSION OF A VALID CIVIL MARRIAGE: Marriage is traditionally defined as the legally recognized life long voluntary union between two parties to the exclusion of all others.  Capacity to act – mentally ill persons - if they enter into marriage the moment this occurs marriage is void.  Infant (children below age of 7) do not have the capacity to act.  Prodigals (a person with normal me...
    (0)
  • R97,94
  • 1x sold
  • + learn more
PVL2601 – ASSIGNMENT 2 SEMESTER 1 AND 2 2021
  • PVL2601 – ASSIGNMENT 2 SEMESTER 1 AND 2 2021

  • Exam (elaborations) • 4 pages • 2022
  • PVL2601 – ASSIGNMENT 2 SEMESTER 1 AND 2 2021. Blood relatives in the collateral line may not marry if either of them is related to their common ancestor(s) within the first degree or generation. Thus, in terms of this rule, you may not marry your brother or sister or any of their children or grandchildren because you are related within the first degree to the common ancestors: that is, your parents and your brother’s or sister’s parents, who are exactly the same people. 2. 3 (See the...
    (0)
  • R47,08
  • + learn more
PVL2601 Family Law Summary Study Notes
  • PVL2601 Family Law Summary Study Notes

  • Summary • 25 pages • 2022
  • PVL2601 Family Law Summary Study Notes. This is an all-inclusive guide to PVL2601 Family Law Summary Study Notes. LEGAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE CONCLUSION OF A VALID CIVIL MARRIAGE: Marriage is traditionally defined as the legally recognized life long voluntary union between two parties to the exclusion of all others.  Capacity to act – mentally ill persons - if they enter into marriage the moment this occurs marriage is void.  Infant (children below age of 7) do not have the capacity...
    (0)
  • R56,50
  • + learn more
PVL2601 – Summary Study Notes 2022(Family Law)
  • PVL2601 – Summary Study Notes 2022(Family Law)

  • Summary • 25 pages • 2022
  • PVL2601 – Summary Study Notes (Family Law) LEGAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE CONCLUSION OF A VALID CIVIL MARRIAGE: Marriage is traditionally defined as the legally recognized life long voluntary union between two parties to the exclusion of all others.  Capacity to act – mentally ill persons - if they enter into marriage the moment this occurs marriage is void.  Infant (children below age of 7) do not have the capacity to act.  Prodigals (a person with normal mental ability but who ...
    (0)
  • R60,27
  • + learn more
PVL2601-Family Law STUDY NOTES.
  • PVL2601-Family Law STUDY NOTES.

  • Class notes • 25 pages • 2022
  • PVL2601-Family Law STUDY NOTES. LEGAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE CONCLUSION OF A VALID CIVIL MARRIAGE: Marriage is traditionally defined as the legally recognized life long voluntary union between two parties to the exclusion of all others.  Capacity to act – mentally ill persons - if they enter into marriage the moment this occurs marriage is void.  Infant (children below age of 7) do not have the capacity to act.  Prodigals (a person with normal mental ability but who is unable of m...
    (0)
  • R60,27
  • + learn more
PVL2601 ASSIGNMENT 1 SEMESTER 1 OF 2023 [358216]
  • PVL2601 ASSIGNMENT 1 SEMESTER 1 OF 2023 [358216]

  • Summary • 6 pages • 2023
  • Available in package deal
  • PVL2601 ASSIGNMENT 1 SEMESTER 1 OF 2023 [] QUESTION 1 In which one of the following cases did the Constitutional Court hold that contempt proceedings in the High Court to secure the enforcement of a maintenance debt are appropriate constitutional relief for the enforcement of a claim for the maintenance of children? a. Fose v Minister of Safety and Security b. Reloomel v Ramsay c. Voortrekkerwinkels (Ko-operatief) Bpk v Pretorius d. Bannatyne v Bannatyn
    (0)
  • R50,00
  • 1x sold
  • + learn more