Pvl2601 cases Study guides, Study notes & Summaries
Looking for the best study guides, study notes and summaries about Pvl2601 cases? On this page you'll find 22 study documents about Pvl2601 cases.
All 22 results
Sort by
-
PVL2601 EXAM ANSWERS MAY/JUNE 2023
- Other • 44 pages • 2023
-
- R50,00
- 2x sold
- + learn more
PVL2601 EXAM ANSWERS MAY/JUNE 2023 
 
QUESTIONS ASKED: 
Time left 1:03:40 
Question 49 
Not yet answered 
Marked out of 2.00 
Not flaggedFlag question 
Question text 
In which one of the following cases did the court prohibit a retirement annuity fund from making payments to a maintenance debtor unless the Maintenance Court or the maintenance debtor's former wife consented to such payment? 
 
a. 
Gerber v Gerber and Pocock 
 
b. 
Magewu v Zozo 
 
c. 
Mngadi v Beacon Sweets and Chocolates Provide...
-
PVL2601 - Summarised Cases (Bundle)
- Exam (elaborations) • 42 pages • 2021
- Available in package deal
-
- R80,00
- 4x sold
- + learn more
Contains Latest summaries of the following Cases in PVL2601 - Family Law: 
 
Guggenheim vs Rosenbaum; 
Fourie vs Minister of Home Affairs; 
Ex Parte Dow; 
Moola vs Aulsebrook; 
Solomons vs Abrahams; 
Grobbelaar vs Havenga; 
Peter vs Minister of Law & Order; 
Excell vs Douglas; 
Reloomel vs Ramsay; 
Bannatyne vs Bannatyne; 
Du Plesiss vs Pienaar; 
Nedbank vs van Zyl; 
Reeder vs Softline; 
Schwartz vs Schwartz; 
Swart vs Swart; 
Smit vs Smit; 
Wijker vs Wijker; 
Watt vs Watt; 
Beaumo...
-
PVL2601 - Summarised Cases (Family Law)
- Class notes • 42 pages • 2021
- Available in package deal
-
- R80,00
- 2x sold
- + learn more
Contains Latest summary of the following Cases in PVL2601 - Family Law: 
 
Guggenheim vs Rosenbaum; 
Fourie vs Minister of Home Affairs; 
Ex Parte Dow; 
Moola vs Aulsebrook; 
Solomons vs Abrahams; 
Grobbelaar vs Havenga; 
Peter vs Minister of Law & Order; 
Excell vs Douglas; 
Reloomel vs Ramsay; 
Bannatyne vs Bannatyne; 
Du Plesiss vs Pienaar; 
Nedbank vs van Zyl; 
Reeder vs Softline; 
Schwartz vs Schwartz; 
Swart vs Swart; 
Smit vs Smit; 
Wijker vs Wijker; 
Watt vs Watt; 
Beaumont...
-
PVL2601 - Summary of Cases (Family Law)
- Other • 42 pages • 2021
- Available in package deal
-
- R80,00
- 1x sold
- + learn more
Contains Latest Summaries of the following Cases in PVL2601 - Family Law: 
 
Guggenheim vs Rosenbaum; 
Fourie vs Minister of Home Affairs; 
Ex Parte Dow; 
Moola vs Aulsebrook; 
Solomons vs Abrahams; 
Grobbelaar vs Havenga; 
Peter vs Minister of Law & Order; 
Excell vs Douglas; 
Reloomel vs Ramsay; 
Bannatyne vs Bannatyne; 
Du Plesiss vs Pienaar; 
Nedbank vs van Zyl; 
Reeder vs Softline; 
Schwartz vs Schwartz; 
Swart vs Swart; 
Smit vs Smit; 
Wijker vs Wijker; 
Watt vs Watt; 
Beaumo...
-
PVL2601 – Summary Study Notes (Family Law)
- Class notes • 25 pages • 2023
-
- R97,94
- 1x sold
- + learn more
PVL2601 – 
Summary 
Study Notes 
(Family Law) 
FAMILY LAW: 
LEGAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE CONCLUSION OF A VALID CIVIL MARRIAGE: 
Marriage is traditionally defined as the legally recognized life long voluntary union between two 
parties to the exclusion of all others. 
 Capacity to act – mentally ill persons - if they enter into marriage the moment this occurs 
marriage is void. 
 Infant (children below age of 7) do not have the capacity to act. 
 Prodigals (a person with normal me...
-
PVL2601 – ASSIGNMENT 2 SEMESTER 1 AND 2 2021
- Exam (elaborations) • 4 pages • 2022
-
- R47,08
- + learn more
PVL2601 – ASSIGNMENT 2 SEMESTER 1 AND 2 2021. Blood relatives in the collateral line may not marry if either of them is related to their common 
ancestor(s) within the first degree or generation. 
Thus, in terms of this rule, you may not marry your brother or sister or any of their children or 
grandchildren because you are related within the first degree to the common ancestors: that is, 
your 
parents and your brother’s or sister’s parents, who are exactly the same people. 
2. 3 (See the...
-
PVL2601 Family Law Summary Study Notes
- Summary • 25 pages • 2022
-
- R56,50
- + learn more
PVL2601 Family Law Summary Study Notes. This is an all-inclusive guide to PVL2601 Family Law Summary Study Notes. 
LEGAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE CONCLUSION OF A VALID CIVIL MARRIAGE: 
Marriage is traditionally defined as the legally recognized life long voluntary union between two 
parties to the exclusion of all others. 
 Capacity to act – mentally ill persons - if they enter into marriage the moment this occurs 
marriage is void. 
 Infant (children below age of 7) do not have the capacity...
-
PVL2601 – Summary Study Notes 2022(Family Law)
- Summary • 25 pages • 2022
-
- R60,27
- + learn more
PVL2601 – Summary Study Notes (Family Law) 
LEGAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE CONCLUSION OF A VALID CIVIL MARRIAGE: 
Marriage is traditionally defined as the legally recognized life long voluntary union between two 
parties to the exclusion of all others. 
 Capacity to act – mentally ill persons - if they enter into marriage the moment this occurs 
marriage is void. 
 Infant (children below age of 7) do not have the capacity to act. 
 Prodigals (a person with normal mental ability but who ...
-
PVL2601-Family Law STUDY NOTES.
- Class notes • 25 pages • 2022
-
- R60,27
- + learn more
PVL2601-Family Law STUDY NOTES. LEGAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE CONCLUSION OF A VALID CIVIL MARRIAGE: 
Marriage is traditionally defined as the legally recognized life long voluntary union between two 
parties to the exclusion of all others. 
 Capacity to act – mentally ill persons - if they enter into marriage the moment this occurs 
marriage is void. 
 Infant (children below age of 7) do not have the capacity to act. 
 Prodigals (a person with normal mental ability but who is unable of m...
-
PVL2601 ASSIGNMENT 1 SEMESTER 1 OF 2023 [358216]
- Summary • 6 pages • 2023
- Available in package deal
-
- R50,00
- 1x sold
- + learn more
PVL2601 ASSIGNMENT 1 SEMESTER 1 OF 2023 [] 
 
QUESTION 1 
 
In which one of the following cases did the Constitutional Court hold that contempt proceedings in the High Court to secure the enforcement of a maintenance debt are appropriate constitutional relief for the enforcement of a claim for the maintenance of children? 
 
a. Fose v Minister of Safety and Security 
b. Reloomel v Ramsay 
c. Voortrekkerwinkels (Ko-operatief) Bpk v Pretorius 
d. Bannatyne v Bannatyn