• Wrong document? Swap it for free
  • Written by students who passed
  • Immediately available after payment
  • Read online or as PDF
Sell
Where do you study
Your language
Document preview thumbnail
Preview 1 out of 4 pages
Other

Judicial precedent

Document preview thumbnail
Preview 1 out of 4 pages

it is all about question that are mostly asked in exams

Content preview

TUTORIAL ON TOPIC 8.

JUDICIAL PRECEDENT

QUESTION ONE

What impact has the Constitution 17 th Amendment Act of 2013 had on judicial
precedent? Explain fully.

The impact that the Constitution 17 th Amendment Act of 2013 was as follows: first the
Constitutional Court was made the highest court in all matters of the republic from
section 167(3)a of the Act as it was only the highest court in the matters concerning
the Constitution and the Supreme Court of Appeal was the highest court in matters
that are not constitutional. The Constitutional Court is now the highest Court in all
matters and makes the final decision in all matters including the ones from the
parliament and they confirm any order of invalidity from the SCA as provided in
section 167(3)(b) of the Act and precedents from the Constitutional Court bind all the
other Court beneath it. Now the SCA is second highest Court below the
Constitutional Court and above the High Court in the hierarchy of the Courts and
thus they confirm the order of invalidity from the High Court from section 168 of the
Act and make appeals to the Constitutional Court for the confirmation of an order of
invalidity. The SCA decides only the appeals or any issue relating to the appeals as
provided in section 168(3)(b) of the Act. The precedents from the SCA binds the
High Courts and Lower Courts.

The High Court is the third highest Court in the hierarchy, and they can decide on
every constitutional matter except in a situation whereby only the Constitutional
Court wants to hear it directly from section 169(1)(a) of the Act. The High are now
distributed in divisions across South Africa and each division has a Judge President
and his deputies and officials from section 169(3) of the Act. The decisions from the
various divisions does not bind each other but they are persuasive since these
decisions from the divisions are made independently from each division. The
precedent from the High Court binds the Magistrate courts and other lower Court.
The Magistrate courts does not decide on constitutional matters as stated in section
170 of the Act and their decision bind neither High Court, SCA and CC.

Document information

Uploaded on
April 26, 2023
Number of pages
4
Written in
2021/2022
Type
Other
Person
Unknown
R125,00

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF

Sold
1
Followers
1
Items
7
Last sold
3 year ago



Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their exams and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can immediately select a different document that better matches what you need.

Pay how you prefer, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card or EFT and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions