Summary Contract Law LLB Revision Guides (ULAW)

Revision guides for unit 1 to unit 9 of Contract Law from the University of Law. Each has concise notes covering key cases, legislation and concepts. Notes taken from lecture and workshop notes, as well as other revision guides. Helped me achieve a first class. Cases:  Barry v Davis (2000)  Blackpool & Fylde Aeroclub v Blackpool Borough Council (1990)  Blue v Ashley (2017)  Byrne & Co v Van Tienhoven & Co (1880)  Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co (1893)  Dickinson v Dodds (1876)  Errington v Errington (1952)  Fischer v Bell (1961)  Hyde v Wrench (1840)  Luxor v Cooper (1941)  Mountford v Scott (1975)  Partridge v Crittenden (1968)  Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain v Boots Cash Chemist (1953)  Routledge v Grant (1829)  Shuey v US (1875)  Spencer v Harding (1870)  The Brimnes (1975) Tenax Steamship Co. Ltd v The Brimnes Adams v Lindsell (1818)  Byrne & co v Van Tienhoven & co (1880)  Entores v Miles Far East Corp (1955)  Brinkibon v Stahag Stahl (1983)  Household Fire Insurance v Grant (1879)  Bernuth Lines v High Seas Shipping (2005)  Powel v Lee (1988)  Mondial Shipping and Chartering v Astorte Shipping (1995)  Hyde v Wrench (1840)  Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball (1892)  Stevenson, Jaques & Co v Mclean (1880)  Felthouse v Bindley (1862)  Re Selectmove (1995)  Cooper v National Westminster Bank (2009)  Thomas v BPE Solicitors (2010)  Brogden v Metropolitan Railway (1877)  Butler Machine Tool v Ex-Cell-o Corporation (1979) Baird Textile Holding v Marks and Spencer PLC (2001)  Balfour v Balfour (1919)  Chappell v Nestle (1960)  Collins v Godefroy (1880)  Currie v Misa (1875)  Edwards v Skyways (1964)  Glasbrook v Glamorgan County Council (1925)  Horner v Sidway (1891)  Lampleigh v Braithwait (1615)  Latimer Management Consultants v Ellinghorn Investments (2005)  Marsden v Barclays Bank PLC (2016)  Merrit v Merrit (1970)  Pao on v Lau Yin Long (1980)  Parker v Clarke (1960)  Pitts v Jones (2007)  Roscorla v Thomas (1842)  Rose and Frank v Compton Bros (1925)  Tweddle v Atkinson (1861)  Ward v Byham (1956)  White v Bluett (1853)  Williams v Williams (1957) Stilk v Myrick (1809)  Hartley v Ponsonby (1857)  William v Roffey Bros (1990)  Harris v Watson (1791)  Foakes v Beer (1884)  Pinnel’s Case (1602)  Alan & Co v El Nasr Export & Import Co (1972)  Central London Properties v High Trees House (1947)  Combe v Combe (1957)  Ajayi v Briscoe (1964)  Tool Metal Manufacturing v Tungsten Electric Co (1955)  D&C Builders v Rees (1966) White Rosebay Shipping v Hong Kong Chain Glory Shipping (2013)  Anglia Television v Reed (1972)  Omak Maritime v Mamola Challenger (2010)  Exeter NHS Foundation Truse v ATOS IT Services (2017)  The Heron II (1969)  Lumley v Wagner (1852) L’Estrange v Graucob (1934)  Parker v SE Railways (1877)  Chappleton v Barry (1940)  Olley v Marlborough Court (1949)  Interfoto Picture Library v Stiletto Programmes 1989)  Thornton v Shoe Lane Parking (1971)  Spurling v Bradshaw (1956)  Hollier v Rambler Motors (1972)  Stewart Gill v Horatio Myer(1992)  Houghton v Trafalgar Insurance Co (1954)  Dairy Containers v Tasman Orient Line CV (2004)  Direct Travel v McGeown (2003)  Photo Production v Securicor Transport (1980)  Smith v Eric Bush (1990)  Watford Electronics v Sanderson (2001) Davis Contractors v Fareham Urban District Council (1956)  Bankline v Arthur Capel & Co (1919)  Condor v Baron Knights (1966)  Fibrosa SA v Fairbairn Lawson Combe Barbour (1943)  Taylor v Caldwell (1863)  Krell v Henry (1903)  Metropolitan Water Board v Dick Kerr and Co (1918)  Paradine v Jane (1647)  J Lautitze AS v Wijsmuller BV (Super Servant Two) (1990)  Maratime Fish v Ocean Trawlers (1935)  Tsakiroglou & co v Noblee Thorl (1962)  National Carriers v Panalpina (1981)  Gamerco SA v ICM/Fair Warning (1995) Oscar Chess v Williams (1957)  Bannerman v White (1861)  Ecay v Godfrey (1947)  Inntrepreneur Pubco v East Crown (2000)  Bissett v Wilkinson (1927)  Smith v Land and House Property Corporation (1884)  Curtis v Chemical Cleaning & Dyeing (1951)  Walters v Morgan (1861)  With v O’Flanaghan (1936)  JEB Fasteners v Marks Bloom (1983)  Edgington v Fitzmaurice (1885)  Derry v Peek (1889)  Spice Girls v Aprilia World Service (2002)  East v Maurer (1991)  Harold Marine & Dredging v Ogden (1978)  Royscot Trust v Rogerson (1991)  Leaf v International Galleries (1950)  Erlanger v New Sombrero Phosphate (1878)  Atwood v Small (1838)  Redgrave v Hurd (1881) Barton v Armstrong (1975)  Atlas Express v Kafco (1989)  Adam Opel GmbH v Mitras Automotive (2007)  Carillion Construction v Felix (UK) (2001)  North Atlantic Shipping v Hyundai Construction (The Atlantic Baron) (1979)  Daniel v Drew (2005)  Royal Bank of Scotland v Etridge (no 2) (2001)  O’Sullivan v Management Agency (1985)  CIBC Mortgage v Pitt (1993)  Barclays Bank v O’Brien (1994)  Credit Leyonnais Bank Nederland v Burch (1997)