2025 AQA A-LEVEL HISTORY Component 2Q The American
Dream: Reality and Illusion, 1945–1980 Question Paper & Mark
Scheme (Merged) Friday 6 June 2025 [VERIFIED]
A-level
HISTORY
Component 2Q The American Dream: reality and illusion, 1945–1980
Friday 6 June 2025 Afternoon Time allowed: 2 hours 30 minutes
Materials
For this paper you must have:
an AQA 16-page answer book.
Instructions
Use black ink or black ball-point pen.
Write the information required on the front of your answer book. The Paper Reference is
7042/2Q.
Answer three questions.
In Section A answer Question 01.
In Section B answer two questions.
Information
The marks for questions are shown in brackets.
The maximum mark for this paper is 80.
You will be marked on your ability to:
– use good English
– organise information clearly
– use specialist vocabulary where appropriate.
Advice
You are advised to spend about:
– 1 hour on Question 01 from Section A
– 45 minutes on each of the two questions answered from Section B.
IB/G/Jun25/G4005/E5 7042/2Q
, 2
Section A
Answer Question 01.
Source A
From an address to the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People
(NAACP), by President Truman, 29 June 1947.
As Americans, we believe that every man should be free to live his life as he wishes. He
should be limited only by his responsibility to his fellow countrymen and each man should
be guaranteed equality of opportunity. The only limit to an American’s achievement
should be his ability, his industry, and his character. Our task is to remove the final
barriers which stand between millions of citizens and their birthright. There is no 5
justifiable reason for discrimination because of ancestry, or religion, or race, or color. We
must not tolerate such limitations on the freedom of any of our people and on their
enjoyment of the basic rights which every citizen in a truly democratic society must
possess. Every man should have the right to a decent home, the right to education, the
right to adequate medical care, the right to a worthwhile job, the right to an equal share in 10
making the public decisions through the ballot, and the right to a fair trial in a fair court.
Source B
From the testimony of General Eisenhower to the Senate Armed Services Committee,
24 April 1948. Eisenhower opposed President Truman’s ambition to desegregate the
army.
Now, if you are going to go further with desegregating the army, here is the problem you
run into. In general, the black man is less well educated than his white counterpart. If
you completely integrate, what you are going to get in every company is blacks relegated
to the minor jobs. The black man is never going to get a promotion because the
competition is too tough. If, on the other hand, he is in smaller units of his own, he can 5
move up and I believe he is entitled to show his own abilities. I do not mean to say that I
have a final answer to the problem, and I believe that the problem of racism will
disappear through education, through mutual respect, and so on. But I do believe that if
we attempt merely by passing a lot of laws to force someone to like someone else, we
are just going to get into trouble. 10
IB/G/Jun25/7042/2Q
, 3
Source C
From the verdict in the McLaurin v Oklahoma case by Chief Justice Vinson, 5 June 1950.
McLaurin attended the University of Oklahoma but was segregated from white students.
It may be argued that Mr McLaurin will be in no better position when these restrictions
are removed, for he may still be rejected by his fellow students. We think this is
irrelevant. There is a vast difference – a constitutional difference – between restrictions
imposed by the state which prohibit the intellectual mixing of students, and the refusal of
individuals to mix. The removal of the state restrictions will not necessarily stop 5
individual and group prejudices but, at the very least, the state will not be depriving
Mr McLaurin of the opportunity to secure acceptance by his fellow students on his own
merits. We conclude that the current conditions of Mr McLaurin’s education deprive him
of his right to the equal protection of the laws. We hold that the Fourteenth Amendment
prevents differences in treatment by the state, based upon race. McLaurin, having been 10
admitted to a state-supported graduate school, must receive the same treatment at the
hands of the state as students of other races.
0 1 With reference to these sources and your understanding of the historical context,
assess the value of these three sources to an historian studying responses to the
campaign for African-American Civil Rights in the years 1945 to 1950.
[30 marks]
Turn over for Section B
IB/G/Jun25/7042/2Q Turn over ►
Dream: Reality and Illusion, 1945–1980 Question Paper & Mark
Scheme (Merged) Friday 6 June 2025 [VERIFIED]
A-level
HISTORY
Component 2Q The American Dream: reality and illusion, 1945–1980
Friday 6 June 2025 Afternoon Time allowed: 2 hours 30 minutes
Materials
For this paper you must have:
an AQA 16-page answer book.
Instructions
Use black ink or black ball-point pen.
Write the information required on the front of your answer book. The Paper Reference is
7042/2Q.
Answer three questions.
In Section A answer Question 01.
In Section B answer two questions.
Information
The marks for questions are shown in brackets.
The maximum mark for this paper is 80.
You will be marked on your ability to:
– use good English
– organise information clearly
– use specialist vocabulary where appropriate.
Advice
You are advised to spend about:
– 1 hour on Question 01 from Section A
– 45 minutes on each of the two questions answered from Section B.
IB/G/Jun25/G4005/E5 7042/2Q
, 2
Section A
Answer Question 01.
Source A
From an address to the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People
(NAACP), by President Truman, 29 June 1947.
As Americans, we believe that every man should be free to live his life as he wishes. He
should be limited only by his responsibility to his fellow countrymen and each man should
be guaranteed equality of opportunity. The only limit to an American’s achievement
should be his ability, his industry, and his character. Our task is to remove the final
barriers which stand between millions of citizens and their birthright. There is no 5
justifiable reason for discrimination because of ancestry, or religion, or race, or color. We
must not tolerate such limitations on the freedom of any of our people and on their
enjoyment of the basic rights which every citizen in a truly democratic society must
possess. Every man should have the right to a decent home, the right to education, the
right to adequate medical care, the right to a worthwhile job, the right to an equal share in 10
making the public decisions through the ballot, and the right to a fair trial in a fair court.
Source B
From the testimony of General Eisenhower to the Senate Armed Services Committee,
24 April 1948. Eisenhower opposed President Truman’s ambition to desegregate the
army.
Now, if you are going to go further with desegregating the army, here is the problem you
run into. In general, the black man is less well educated than his white counterpart. If
you completely integrate, what you are going to get in every company is blacks relegated
to the minor jobs. The black man is never going to get a promotion because the
competition is too tough. If, on the other hand, he is in smaller units of his own, he can 5
move up and I believe he is entitled to show his own abilities. I do not mean to say that I
have a final answer to the problem, and I believe that the problem of racism will
disappear through education, through mutual respect, and so on. But I do believe that if
we attempt merely by passing a lot of laws to force someone to like someone else, we
are just going to get into trouble. 10
IB/G/Jun25/7042/2Q
, 3
Source C
From the verdict in the McLaurin v Oklahoma case by Chief Justice Vinson, 5 June 1950.
McLaurin attended the University of Oklahoma but was segregated from white students.
It may be argued that Mr McLaurin will be in no better position when these restrictions
are removed, for he may still be rejected by his fellow students. We think this is
irrelevant. There is a vast difference – a constitutional difference – between restrictions
imposed by the state which prohibit the intellectual mixing of students, and the refusal of
individuals to mix. The removal of the state restrictions will not necessarily stop 5
individual and group prejudices but, at the very least, the state will not be depriving
Mr McLaurin of the opportunity to secure acceptance by his fellow students on his own
merits. We conclude that the current conditions of Mr McLaurin’s education deprive him
of his right to the equal protection of the laws. We hold that the Fourteenth Amendment
prevents differences in treatment by the state, based upon race. McLaurin, having been 10
admitted to a state-supported graduate school, must receive the same treatment at the
hands of the state as students of other races.
0 1 With reference to these sources and your understanding of the historical context,
assess the value of these three sources to an historian studying responses to the
campaign for African-American Civil Rights in the years 1945 to 1950.
[30 marks]
Turn over for Section B
IB/G/Jun25/7042/2Q Turn over ►
