100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Other

Criminal law class notes

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
4
Uploaded on
21-02-2021
Written in
2019/2020

Mental illness defence in criminal law, class notes









Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Document information

Uploaded on
February 21, 2021
Number of pages
4
Written in
2019/2020
Type
Other
Person
Unknown

Subjects

Content preview

W4 C3 – MENTAL ILLNESS DEFENCES

1) “The defence of insanity pays insufficient attention to medical knowledge; the
defence of diminished responsibility pays too much.” Discuss.
(Prepare an essay outline, as you would in the exam.)
 INTRO:
o Include conclusion.
o Show the side you are picking overall.
o Context; i.e. for the question. Start by paraphrasing the question, e.g. discuss
any statute or cases or developments in the topic involved.
 DEFENCE OF INSANITY:
o HAVE A MINI CONCLUSION AT THE END OF EVERY PARA; EVALUATIONS
o 20 cases a year of insanity a year. Has to be proven by D on the balance of
probabilities.
o ‘A quagmire of law seldom entered nowadays save by those in desperate
need of some kind of defence… a quick backward look at the state of
medicine in 1843 will suffice to show how unreal it would be to apply the
concepts of that age to the present time’. (Lawton LJ in R v Quick).
o D’s mental capacities AT THE TIME of the offence,
o Special verdict: NOT GUILTY by REASON OF INSANITY.
o Infrequently used! Issues of stigma (Law Commission) stemming from the
word ‘insanity’.
o Limits of defence?
o Hospital admission, with or without a restriction order (approx. 40 percent).
o DEFECT OF REASON
o Defect of reason is narrow. It is a legal, not psychiatric meaning. It is
cognitive, not volitional or emotionally limitations.
o M’NAGHTEN:
o Defect of reason caused by disease of the mind which causes D
NOT TO KNOW THE NATURE AND QUALITY OF THE ACT (profound
delusions/hallucinations) and also NOT TO KNOW THE ACT WAS WRONG:
Legal, not moral wrong.
IN THE ESSAY DISCUSS WHAT THE DISEASE OF THE MIND IS.
DISEASES OF THE MIND = diabetes or something else.
o R v Windle (1952), confirmed in Johnson (2008)
o In practice, a benign approach. Mackay et al (2006) where morality not
legality seems to count.
o Wrongness judged by the standards of reasonable ordinary people (CCC:
‘fudging’ morality and illegality).
o DISEASE OF THE MIND DEFINED IN BRATTY V AG FOR NI:
o Lord Denning at 412: ‘It seems to me that any mental disorder which has
manifested itself in violence and is prone to recur is a disease of the mind. At
£7.49
Get access to the full document:

100% satisfaction guarantee
Immediately available after payment
Both online and in PDF
No strings attached

Get to know the seller
Seller avatar
enesztrk

Also available in package deal

Thumbnail
Package deal
Criminal Law Notes Bundle
-
2 11 2021
£ 82.39 More info

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
enesztrk AQA
View profile
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
5
Member since
6 year
Number of followers
2
Documents
73
Last sold
7 months ago

0.0

0 reviews

5
0
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their exams and reviewed by others who've used these revision notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No problem! You can straightaway pick a different document that better suits what you're after.

Pay as you like, start learning straight away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and smashed it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions