Written by students who passed Immediately available after payment Read online or as PDF Wrong document? Swap it for free 4.6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Document preview thumbnail
Preview 2 out of 6 pages
Summary

Summary OCR A-Level English Language and Gender Theorists and Theories.

Document preview thumbnail
Preview 2 out of 6 pages

This is an overview of the four different language and gender theories and applicable theorists, which are relevant to the OCR English Language A Level. It includes outlines of different theorists' arguments such as Robin Lakoff, Deborah Cameron, and Otto Jespersen.

Content preview

English Language A-Level: Language and Gender Theorists and Their Theories

Overview of the models:
 The Difference Model
 The language of men and women is simply different. Neither is superior,
it’s just that the style of speech adopted by a female is in contrast to
that of a man.
 The Dominance Model
 Argues that the language of men is more dominant in society. That is to
say the language of men holds more power than that of women.
 The Deficit Model
 Argues that women’s language is lacking in some form. That is to say
that women cannot do certain things that men can because of a lack of
‘something’ in their language.
 The Diversity Model
 This is the idea that suggests sex and gender are different things.
Linguists who support this would argue that one’s biological sex has no
influence on language. Instead, it is society and socialisation that affects
our language.

Theorists:

Robin Lakoff
 Deficit theory/model – 1975
 Study consisted only of white American middle-class people and was
only a small sample.
 Argues that women are socialised into behaving like ‘ladies’
(linguistically and in other ways too) and that this in turn keeps them in
their place because being ‘ladylike’ precludes being ‘powerful.’ She
suggests these are the main features of this language:
Feature Description
Hedging/hedge phrases Such as ‘sort of’, ‘kind of’ or ‘it seems like’.
Super polite forms Such as ‘would you mind’ or ‘I’d appreciate
it if.’
Hypercorrect grammar Such as always speaking clearly or avoiding
and pronunciation talking too fast.
Tag questions Such as ‘You like it, don’t you?’
Speaking in italics Putting emphasis on adverbs such as ‘very’
Empty adjectives Using adjectives to over-describe
something, making more emotional

, evaluations rather than intellectual ones.
Such as ‘adorable,’ or ‘divine.’
Apologising often Such as ‘I’m sorry, but I think that...’
Lack of humour They don’t tell jokes well or understand the
punch line of them.
Indirect speech Such as using indirect commands.
Avoiding coarse Such as swear words or sexual language.
language More likely to use euphemisms.
Use direct quotations Such as ‘she was like’ or ‘they said this.’
(men paraphrase more).
Have a special lexicon They have a wider vocabulary. Such as
knowing the names for different shades of
Blue, whereas men would just say ‘blue.’
Use of intonation Women use question intonation in
declarative sentences, expressing
uncertainty.
Use of ‘wh’ imperatives Such as ‘why don’t you open the door?’
Overuse qualifiers Such as ‘I think that...’
Use modal constructions Such as ‘can, would, should.’
Use more intensifiers Such as ‘I’m so glad...’

 Politeness Principle – 1973
 Argues that there are three rules which should be used in conversation
to ensure it is cooperative and successful:
Don’t Impose Also known as ‘negative politeness’,
this can be demonstrated through
hedging. It would include saying things
like: “could you maybe” or “might it be
possible to...?” Also, apologetic phrases
are common, such as “I’m sorry to
bother you.”
Give options This is about not taking complete
control and letting the person have a
choice. For example: “do you want to
go first?” or “What would you rather
do?” this could make the other person
feel that their opinion is valued in the
situation.
Make the receiver feel good This is about making sure that the
receiver feels appreciated for who they

Document information

Study Level
Uploaded on
February 7, 2021
Number of pages
6
Written in
2017/2018
Type
Summary
£5.49

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
georgdv1999
2.5
(6)
Sold
13
Followers
10
Items
13
Last sold
3 year ago



Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their exams and reviewed by others who've used these revision notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No problem! You can straightaway pick a different document that better suits what you're after.

Pay as you like, start learning straight away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and smashed it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions