100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Summary

Summary LPC Dispute Resolution Workshop 1 and 2 revision notes

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
20
Uploaded on
05-11-2025
Written in
2024/2025

Dispute resolution (DR) notes covering workshop 1 and 2 from the LPC course. Distinction Grade. These notes include: (1) Clear and detailed notes created specifically for answering exam questions (2) Tips, techniques and points to note for answering questions

Show more Read less










Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Document information

Uploaded on
November 5, 2025
Number of pages
20
Written in
2024/2025
Type
Summary

Content preview

DR WS 1 & 2
DR – Pre-action steps
Overriding objective

The overriding objective must be borne in mind by the courts (r 1.2) and the parties and their legal advisors have a
positive duty to assist the court in furthering OO (r 1.3)
Each party is required to help the court to further OO, but has NO duty or obligation to their opponent
- E.g. no need to draw attention to mistake made on other party’s part (Woodward v Phoenix Healthcare)

The OO of the CPR 1998 is to enable the court to deal with cases justly and at proportionate cost (r 1.1) This means:
 Ensuring parties are on equal footing
 Saving expense
 Deal with cases in ways which are proportionate
 To the amount of money involved
 To the importance of the case
 To the complexity of the issues
 The financial position of parties
 Ensuring cases are dealt with expeditiously and fairly
 Allotting an appropriate share of the court’s resources to each case,
bearing in mind the needs of other cases


Outline of a civil claim




1

,DR WS 1 & 2




Outcome 1: Be able to carry out initial steps in a dispute resolution matter, including case analysis.

Pre-Commencement of Proceedings (Pre-Action Steps)

STEP
1) Check any professional conduct The solicitor acting in civil proceedings must have regard to the follow
points rules of professional conduct:

Duty of confidentiality:
6.3 of the SRA Code of Conduct 2019 – unless the client’s prior authority is
obtained/S permitted by law
 Duty extends past end of retainer

Conflict of interest:
6.2 of the SRA Code of Conduct 2019.
 S should not act where there is a conflict of interest
 2 or more clients where there would be a conflicting duty to act in
best interest

Money laundering:
Subject to related legislation so must ensure that adequate procedures in
place to check new client’s identity.

Who the client is and authorisation to act:
If receives instructions from someone other than client, or by only one client
on behalf of others, should not proceed without checking all clients agree
with instructions given.

Solicitor’s duty as an officer of the court:
- 1.4 SRA 2019 Overriding duty not to mislead the court.
- Must disclose ALL relevant legal authorities to the court, even if not
favourable to case.
- Help court achieve the overriding objective.

Solicitor’s core duties:
The SRA Code of Conduct 2011 is based on certain mandatory principles.
2) Identify the client’s objectives - What does the client want?
o Ie damages see below or compensation, ‘his day in court’?
Remedy/injunction
- What realistically can be achieved?

Merits of claim must be balanced with overall cost of pursuing it + prospects
of successful outcome
- Client to be advised on:
o Law
o Possible defences to anticipate
o OO and requirements to help court further OO
- Commercial clients to take into account potential damage to market
standing/product image if pursuing claim
3) Identify and locate, if necessary, all stablish whether each party/defendant is worth pursuing
potential parties/defendants - All persons to be sued should be sued at the SAME time and in the
SAME action (Morris v Wentworth-Stanley)

2

, DR WS 1 & 2

4) Costs - Check the financial viability - Is the defendant solvent?
of the defendant - Will the defendant be able to pay any judgment and costs?
- What assets are available?
- What are the assets worth?
5) Check jurisdiction - Any relevant contractual clauses?
- Are one or more parties outside the jurisdiction?

Which country’s court can proceedings be commenced → determined by
whether claimant requires court’s permission to service proceedings outside
of England/Wales
- English courts can hear any proceedings if claim form was served on D
whilst D was IN England/Wales
o But D could object on ground that English courts not most
appropriate
6) Assess limitation periods Basic rules: LA 1980
Proceedings MUST be issued BEFORE limitation period expires  could face
negligence claim if not

Proceedings start when court office receives claim force BEFORE the date
issued by the court (St Helens Met BC v Barnes)

Claim form DEEMED ISSUED when court fee paid on CE-file
Types of claim Statutory limitation period
Contract 6 years (s5)
(excluding personal injury) as soon as breach of contract occurs;
OR
when services supplied are
completed
Tort 6 years (s2)
(excluding personal injury and latent when the tort is committed
damage) when some damage occurs tort of
(negligence)
Latent damage (ONLY NEGLIGENCE) 6 years from date when breach
In non-personal injury claim based on occurred
negligence where the damage is OR
latent (C NOT AWARE OF IT) at the 3 years from date of knowledge of
date when the cause of action material facts about damage (s14A)
accrues
15 year long-stop limitation period
(final period) from date of alleged
breach of duty (s14B) REGARDLESS
of claimant's awareness or the
actual accrual of the cause of action
Children/protected party Begins when claimant NO LONGER a
(someone incapable of child/protected party
managing/administering property
and affairs)


NB: Any relevant contractual clauses?
7) Discuss and agree funding with the - What can the client afford to pay?
client - Does the client have any suitable BEI?
- Is the case suitable for a CFA or DBA and/or AEI cover?
- Does the client qualify for public funding or require third-party funding?

- How much time and resources will the client have to commit to
investigate and deal with the case?
- Does a cost–benefit analysis suggest the desirability of a quicker and
cheaper solution than litigation can offer?

3
£6.49
Get access to the full document:

100% satisfaction guarantee
Immediately available after payment
Both online and in PDF
No strings attached

Get to know the seller
Seller avatar
lailagk
5.0
(1)

Also available in package deal

Thumbnail
Package deal
LPC Dispute Resolution Workshop 1 to 16 revision notes
-
12 2025
£ 77.88 More info

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
lailagk University of the People
View profile
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
1
Member since
8 months
Number of followers
0
Documents
56
Last sold
1 month ago

5.0

1 reviews

5
1
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their exams and reviewed by others who've used these revision notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No problem! You can straightaway pick a different document that better suits what you're after.

Pay as you like, start learning straight away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and smashed it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions