22.12.2024
SA3 Bail and Remands
Adjournments in the Magistrates’ Court
Power to Adjourn
Magistrates’ courts may adjourn proceedings before a Crown Court trial or before/during
a summary trial (MCA 1980, ss.10, 18).
Adjournment may include fixing a time/place for the next hearing or leaving it to the
court's discretion.
Judicial Review of Adjournments
Decisions to adjourn can be challenged via judicial review, but the High Court intervenes
only for compelling reasons (CrimPD 5.4.4).
High Court is particularly slow to interfere with refusals of adjournments (R (CPS) v
Uxbridge Magistrates [2007]) unless:
Error of law or principle, or
Decision was plainly wrong (DPP v Petrie [2015]).
Fair trial considerations may lead to a retrial if refusal causes injustice (Pari-Jones v CPS
[2018], R (Parashar) v Sunderland Magistrates' Court [2019]).
Statutory Provisions for Adjournments
MCA 1980, s.10: Applies to summary offences and either-way offences post-mode-of-
trial determination.
MCA 1980, s.18: Governs adjournments before allocation is determined (either-way
offences).
Courts may remand the accused during adjournments:
Mandatory Remand (ss.10(4), 18(4)): Required if the accused:
First appeared in custody or after surrendering to bail.
Was previously remanded during proceedings.
Discretionary Adjournment Without Remand: Possible if the accused:
First appeared in response to summons/requisition, and
Has not been remanded at an earlier hearing.
Remanding the Accused
Options for Remand:
Custody: Detained until the next hearing.
Bail: Released under conditions, per BA 1976.
Accused appearing under requisition/postal charge may not be remanded unless
necessary (R (Iqbal) v Canterbury Crown Court [2020]).
Failure to Appear
Not Remanded: No offence if the accused fails to appear, but:
Arrest warrant may be issued.
Proceedings may continue in their absence.
Remanded on Bail: Failing to surrender without cause is an offence under BA 1976.
Fixing Dates
No Remand: Next hearing date need not be fixed during adjournment.
With Remand: Adjournment date must be fixed immediately and becomes the remand
date.
Time Limits Applicable to Remands in Custody and Applications for their Extension
Further Remands
Repeated Remands:
Magistrates may remand an accused multiple times before the trial begins (MCA
1980, s.128(3)).
1
Max Lewis
, 22.12.2024
Magistrates can refuse adjournments if they deem it unjust, e.g., when a party fails to
prepare despite sufficient time.
Alternate Magistrates' Court for Remands:
Under s.130, the court may direct subsequent remands to a magistrates’ court closer
to the prison where the accused is confined.
The alternate court retains the same powers as the original court regarding remand
decisions.
Remands in Absence
MCA 1980, s.129:
Courts may remand an absent accused for reasons such as illness or accident.
Administrative errors preventing the accused’s production in court can qualify as
‘accidents’ (Hillman v Governor of Bronzefield Prison [2013]).
Applies whether the accused is on bail or in custody.
Granting Bail in Absence:
The court may grant bail without the accused being present for reasons beyond
illness or accident, such as:
Anticipation of a busy court schedule.
Acceptable explanations for non-appearance.
The court may enlarge recognizances of sureties, obligating them to secure the
accused’s attendance on the next hearing date.
Custody Time-Limits (CTLs)
Statutory Basis: Governed by Prosecution of Offences Act 1985, s.22 and the Custody
Time Limits Regulations 1987 (SI 1987 No. 299).
Designed to prevent excessive pre-trial detention and ensure proceedings progress
promptly.
Time-Limits for Custody
First Appearance to Committal:
70 days for indictable offences (Reg.4(2), 4(4)).
First Appearance to Summary Trial:
56 days for summary offences.
70 days for either way offences if tried summarily, unless a decision for summary trial
is made within 56 days, in which case the limit is reduced to 56 days.
Committal to Crown Court Trial:
112 days from committal to trial (Reg.5(3)(a)).
Section 51 Sending (CDA 1998):
182 days from sending to trial in the Crown Court, with deduction for any custody
period in magistrates' court (Reg.5(6B)).
Retrials and Voluntary Bills:
Retrial: 112 days from indictment following Court of Appeal direction (Leeds Crown
Court, ex parte Whitehead).
Voluntary Bill of Indictment: 112 days from the date of preferment of the bill (Reg.5(3)
(b)).
Multiple Committals:
For single indictments covering offences from different committals, the 112-day
limit applies separately to each offence (Reg.6(4)).
Extensions to Custody Time-Limits
Grounds for Extension:
Prosecution must demonstrate:
Due diligence and expedition in case progression.
Good and sufficient cause, such as unforeseen procedural or evidential delays.
Examples: Witness unavailability, sudden illness of key individuals.
2
Max Lewis
SA3 Bail and Remands
Adjournments in the Magistrates’ Court
Power to Adjourn
Magistrates’ courts may adjourn proceedings before a Crown Court trial or before/during
a summary trial (MCA 1980, ss.10, 18).
Adjournment may include fixing a time/place for the next hearing or leaving it to the
court's discretion.
Judicial Review of Adjournments
Decisions to adjourn can be challenged via judicial review, but the High Court intervenes
only for compelling reasons (CrimPD 5.4.4).
High Court is particularly slow to interfere with refusals of adjournments (R (CPS) v
Uxbridge Magistrates [2007]) unless:
Error of law or principle, or
Decision was plainly wrong (DPP v Petrie [2015]).
Fair trial considerations may lead to a retrial if refusal causes injustice (Pari-Jones v CPS
[2018], R (Parashar) v Sunderland Magistrates' Court [2019]).
Statutory Provisions for Adjournments
MCA 1980, s.10: Applies to summary offences and either-way offences post-mode-of-
trial determination.
MCA 1980, s.18: Governs adjournments before allocation is determined (either-way
offences).
Courts may remand the accused during adjournments:
Mandatory Remand (ss.10(4), 18(4)): Required if the accused:
First appeared in custody or after surrendering to bail.
Was previously remanded during proceedings.
Discretionary Adjournment Without Remand: Possible if the accused:
First appeared in response to summons/requisition, and
Has not been remanded at an earlier hearing.
Remanding the Accused
Options for Remand:
Custody: Detained until the next hearing.
Bail: Released under conditions, per BA 1976.
Accused appearing under requisition/postal charge may not be remanded unless
necessary (R (Iqbal) v Canterbury Crown Court [2020]).
Failure to Appear
Not Remanded: No offence if the accused fails to appear, but:
Arrest warrant may be issued.
Proceedings may continue in their absence.
Remanded on Bail: Failing to surrender without cause is an offence under BA 1976.
Fixing Dates
No Remand: Next hearing date need not be fixed during adjournment.
With Remand: Adjournment date must be fixed immediately and becomes the remand
date.
Time Limits Applicable to Remands in Custody and Applications for their Extension
Further Remands
Repeated Remands:
Magistrates may remand an accused multiple times before the trial begins (MCA
1980, s.128(3)).
1
Max Lewis
, 22.12.2024
Magistrates can refuse adjournments if they deem it unjust, e.g., when a party fails to
prepare despite sufficient time.
Alternate Magistrates' Court for Remands:
Under s.130, the court may direct subsequent remands to a magistrates’ court closer
to the prison where the accused is confined.
The alternate court retains the same powers as the original court regarding remand
decisions.
Remands in Absence
MCA 1980, s.129:
Courts may remand an absent accused for reasons such as illness or accident.
Administrative errors preventing the accused’s production in court can qualify as
‘accidents’ (Hillman v Governor of Bronzefield Prison [2013]).
Applies whether the accused is on bail or in custody.
Granting Bail in Absence:
The court may grant bail without the accused being present for reasons beyond
illness or accident, such as:
Anticipation of a busy court schedule.
Acceptable explanations for non-appearance.
The court may enlarge recognizances of sureties, obligating them to secure the
accused’s attendance on the next hearing date.
Custody Time-Limits (CTLs)
Statutory Basis: Governed by Prosecution of Offences Act 1985, s.22 and the Custody
Time Limits Regulations 1987 (SI 1987 No. 299).
Designed to prevent excessive pre-trial detention and ensure proceedings progress
promptly.
Time-Limits for Custody
First Appearance to Committal:
70 days for indictable offences (Reg.4(2), 4(4)).
First Appearance to Summary Trial:
56 days for summary offences.
70 days for either way offences if tried summarily, unless a decision for summary trial
is made within 56 days, in which case the limit is reduced to 56 days.
Committal to Crown Court Trial:
112 days from committal to trial (Reg.5(3)(a)).
Section 51 Sending (CDA 1998):
182 days from sending to trial in the Crown Court, with deduction for any custody
period in magistrates' court (Reg.5(6B)).
Retrials and Voluntary Bills:
Retrial: 112 days from indictment following Court of Appeal direction (Leeds Crown
Court, ex parte Whitehead).
Voluntary Bill of Indictment: 112 days from the date of preferment of the bill (Reg.5(3)
(b)).
Multiple Committals:
For single indictments covering offences from different committals, the 112-day
limit applies separately to each offence (Reg.6(4)).
Extensions to Custody Time-Limits
Grounds for Extension:
Prosecution must demonstrate:
Due diligence and expedition in case progression.
Good and sufficient cause, such as unforeseen procedural or evidential delays.
Examples: Witness unavailability, sudden illness of key individuals.
2
Max Lewis