100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Exam (elaborations)

SUS1501 Assignment 2 (COMPLETE ANSWERS) Semester 2 2025 (621187) - DUE 22 August 2025

Rating
5.0
(1)
Sold
2
Pages
10
Grade
A+
Uploaded on
20-08-2025
Written in
2025/2026

SUS1501 Assignment 2 (COMPLETE ANSWERS) Semester 2 2025 (621187) - DUE 22 August 2025; 100% TRUSTED Complete, trusted solutions and explanations. For assistance, Whats-App 0.6.7-1.7.1-1.7.3.9. Ensure your success with us.. R 12 Billion a day! NB THIS ASSIGNMENT WILL BE SUBMITTED TOTURNITIN TO CHECK FOR PLAGIARISM. Time for you to think a little again. In the crossroads assessment, one of the multiple-choice questions was the following: “ In 2024, Elon Musk's net worth increased by about ZAR 12 billionevery day!" My personal opinion on this statement is most closelydescribed by: a. Good for him – he is brilliant and worked hard to earn this. b. The only problem I have with this is that it wasn’t me getting ZAR 12billion richer every day! c. No problem with this. I'm sure Musk donates huge amounts tocharities. d. I think that it is morally wrong for anyone to earn that much money. e. I think that active steps should be taken to correct such immoralearnings I n this assignment we are going to zoom in on option A specifically: “ Good for him –he is brilliant and worked hard to earn this ”. What this option is basically saying is, that the earnings of these billionaires are completely reasonable and justifiable? What we want you to do in this assessment is to examine this act (i.e. someone, perhaps even you, taking R 77 million a day for 6 months) from the perspective of Kant’s formula of universal law version of the categorical imperative. In assignment 1, one of the questions was: "In 2024, Elon Musk's net worth increased by about ZAR 12 billion every day!" My personal opinion on this statement is most closely described by: a. Good for him – he is brilliant and worked hard to earn this. b. The only problem I have with this is that it wasn’t me getting ZAR 12 billion richer every day! c. No problem with this. I'm sure all of these billionaires donate huge amounts to charities. d. I think that it is morally wrong for anyone to earn that much money. e. I think that active steps should be taken to correct such immoral earnings Do you remember which option you chose? In this assignment we are going to zoom in on option “a” specifically: “Good for him – he worked hard to earn this”. What this option is basically saying is, that the earnings of billionaires like Musk are completely reasonable and justifiable? What we want you to do in this assignment is to examine this option (i.e. someone, perhaps even you, earning R 12 billion a day for a year) from the perspective of Kant’s formula of universal law version of the categorical imperative. 2. EVALUATE USING KANT'S CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE (We've done the first two stages for you) State your proposed act as a maxim: "Elon Musk will take R 12 billion (A) every day for a year (C) in order to get really, really rich (E)." Restate this maxim as a universal law: "All people (8.1 billion of them) will take R 12 billion every day for a year in order to get really, really rich." Is the maxim above conceivable in a world ruled by the universal law;

Show more Read less
Institution
Module









Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Connected book

Written for

Institution
Module

Document information

Uploaded on
August 20, 2025
Number of pages
10
Written in
2025/2026
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers

Subjects

Content preview

SUS1501
Assignment 2 Semester 2 2025
Unique Number: 621187

Due Date: 22 August 2025
3. Is the maxim above conceivable in a world ruled by the universal law;


According to Kant’s formula of universal law, an action is morally acceptable only if the
maxim behind it can be universalised without contradiction. In this case, the maxim is that
every person could earn R12 billion every day for a year in order to become very rich. If this
were universalised, it would mean that all 8.1 billion people in the world would generate
R12 billion daily. This is not conceivable because such a system would collapse under its
own impossibility. The global economy does not have the resources, infrastructure, or
value to sustain everyone becoming a billionaire daily. Money itself would lose all meaning
and value, as inflation would skyrocket and goods and services could not match such
artificial wealth.

The contradiction lies in the fact that the maxim depends on scarcity and exclusivity of
resources to make sense. If everyone received R12 billion daily, wealth would cease to
have purchasing power, and no one would actually be “rich.” Therefore, the maxim cannot
be universalised without contradiction. Under Kant’s reasoning, the maxim is inconceivable
as a universal law, and thus morally impermissible.




Terms of use
By making use of this document you agree to:
 Use this document as a guide for learning, comparison and reference purpose,
Terms of use
 Not to duplicate, reproduce and/or misrepresent the contents of this document as your own work,
By making use of this document you agree to:
 Use this document
Fully accept the consequences
solely as a guide forshould you plagiarise
learning, reference,or and
misuse this document.
comparison purposes,
 Ensure originality of your own work, and fully accept the consequences should you plagiarise or misuse this document.
 Comply with all relevant standards, guidelines, regulations, and legislation governing academic and written work.

Disclaimer
Great care has been taken in the preparation of this document; however, the contents are provided "as is" without any express or
implied representations or warranties. The author accepts no responsibility or liability for any actions taken based on the
information contained within this document. This document is intended solely for comparison, research, and reference purposes.
Reproduction, resale, or transmission of any part of this document, in any form or by any means, is strictly prohibited.

, +27 67 171 1739



SUS1501 – Sustainability and Greed

Student Number:
Date:
Teaching Assistant Name:

Declaration:

By submitting this assignment, I implicitly declare that this is my own work.

I am aware that if ANY unacknowledged copying is detected in ANY part of this
assignment, I will get 0 (zero) for the entire assignment.

INSTRUCTIONS:
 Fill in your assignment contributions in the boxes where you see “<Answer in
here>”. DO NOT DELETE THE TEMPLATE CONTENT TO REDUCE YOUR TURNITIN
SCORE;
 Save the file as a Word document with a short name (myUnisa will reject files with
long names);
 Submit this file into the Assessment 2 assignment space on myUnisa;
 Take a screen grab of the final submission acknowledgement on myUnisa and save
this somewhere safe in case of any disputes:
 Check under the Assignments tool that there is a date in the “Processed” cell for the
SUS1501 Assignment 5.
 NB – DO NOT RESUMBIT AN ASSIGNMENT AFTER THE DEADLINE HAS PASSED EVEN
IF THE SYSTEM ALLOWS YOU TO DO SO. THIS WILL CHANGE YOUR SUBMISSION
DATE AND YOUR SUBMISSION WILL REFLECT AS LATE




Disclaimer
Great care has been taken in the preparation of this document; however, the contents are provided "as is"
without any express or implied representations or warranties. The author accepts no responsibility or
liability for any actions taken based on the information contained within this document. This document is
intended solely for comparison, research, and reference purposes. Reproduction, resale, or transmission
of any part of this document, in any form or by any means, is strictly prohibited.
£2.29
Get access to the full document:

100% satisfaction guarantee
Immediately available after payment
Both online and in PDF
No strings attached


Also available in package deal

Reviews from verified buyers

Showing all reviews
3 months ago

5.0

1 reviews

5
1
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0
Trustworthy reviews on Stuvia

All reviews are made by real Stuvia users after verified purchases.

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
EduPal University of South Africa (Unisa)
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
149181
Member since
7 year
Number of followers
35996
Documents
4337
Last sold
8 hours ago

4.2

13561 reviews

5
7807
4
2689
3
1791
2
455
1
819

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their exams and reviewed by others who've used these revision notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No problem! You can straightaway pick a different document that better suits what you're after.

Pay as you like, start learning straight away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and smashed it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions