100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Exam (elaborations)

Dental Jurisprudence Post Exam 2025 Update (Qns & Ans

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
6
Uploaded on
20-08-2025
Written in
2025/2026

Dental Jurisprudence Post Exam 2025 UpdatDental Jurisprudence Post Exam 2025 Update (Qns & AnsDental Jurisprudence Post Exam 2025 Update (Qns & Anse (Qns & Ans

Institution
Dental Jurisprudence
Module
Dental jurisprudence









Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Written for

Institution
Dental jurisprudence
Module
Dental jurisprudence

Document information

Uploaded on
August 20, 2025
Number of pages
6
Written in
2025/2026
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Unknown

Subjects

Content preview

DENTAL JURISPRUDENCE POST EXAM
2025 UPDATE
QNS & ANS
SITUATION I:
Patient A was referred to Dentists B and C by Dentist D and delivered the referral card which stated
that all upper and both lower second bicuscupid teeth were to be removed leaving eight (8) lower
teeth. After her teeth were X-rayed, Patient A was administered sodium pentothal, a general
anaesthetic, by Dentist B who marked the “chart” for the teeth to be removed. She was going to sleep
when asked to sign at the back of the “chart” which is a “Permit for Operation,” containing the
following words: “THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT I, THE UNDERSIGNED, CONSENT TO THE
PERFORMING OF WHATEVER OPERATION MAY BE DECIDED UPON TO BE NECESSARY OR
ADVISABLE, AND THE USE OF LOCAL OR GENERAL
ANAESTHETIC AS INDICATED.” Then Dentist C extracted all of Patient’s A upper and lower teeth
because the “chart” says so. When Patient A regained consciousness, she became very distressed
because she didn’t want all of her teeth removed.


1. Were Patient A’s eight (8) teeth extracted with her consent?

a. No, because the circumstances surrounding the transaction negate any idea that
Patient A signed the “Permit for Operation” with full consent and understanding.
b. No, because Patient A was going to sleep when she signed the “Permit for Operation.”
c. Yes, because Patient A signed the “Permit for Operation.”
d. Yes, because the “Permit for Operation” was a general authority for the dentists to take
out all of Patient A’s teeth

2. What is the right to informed consent?

a. The patient has the right to consent based on the physician-patient contractual relations.
b. It means that, after having been properly educated by the physician about the risks
and benefits of the proposed treatment, and about the viable treatment options,
including the option of no treatment, the patient has the right to choose freely
whether to submit to treatment.
c. The patient has the right to ask his physician questions pertaining to his illness.
d. The patient has limited right to information based on the discretion of the physician.

3. Who can give informed consent?

a. Any incapacitated patient
b. Mistress
c. Parent of a minor
d. Guardian of a capacitated person

4. What is the ethical basis of informed consent?

a. Right of Equal Protection of Law
b. Doctrine of Cognition
c. Principle of Equity

, a. Consensual
b. Express
c. Inherent
d. Fiduciary


SITUATION II:

The court held Dentists B and C liable for damages for unauthorized extraction of Patient A’s teeth.
Choose the specific type of damages which the respondents may be held liable for.

6. It refers to pecuniary loss suffered by a party as he has duly proved.

a. Actual Damage
b. Moral Damage
c. Liquidated
d. Exemplary

7. It includes physical suffering, mental anguish, fright, serious anxiety, besmirched reputation,
wounded feelings, moral shock, social humiliation and similar injury.

a. Actual Damage
b. Moral Damage
c. Liquidated
d. Exemplary

8. It refers to those agreed upon by both parties in case of breach of contract.

a. Actual Damage
b. Moral Damage
c. Liquidated
d. Exemplary

9. It is imposed by way of example or correction for the public good.

a. Actual Damage
b. Moral Damage
c. Liquidated
d. Exemplary

10. It is imposed for pecuniary loss but its amount cannot be ascertained with certainty.

a. Actual Damage
b. Moral Damage
c. Liquidated
d. Temperat

e SITUATION III:

The Professional Regulation Commission (PRC) issued a Resolution restraining examinees from
attending any review class, briefing, conference, or the like conducted by, or from receiving any
handout, review material or any tip from any school, college or university, or any review center or the
like or any reviewer, lecturer, instructor official or employee of any of the aforementioned or similar
institutions during the three days immediately preceding every examination day including the
examination day. Accordingly, a number of reviewees for the Dental Board Exam filed a petition
before the court to question the said PRC Resolution.


11. Is the said PRC Resolution constitutional?

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
Bankart Chamberlain College of Nursing
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
142
Member since
2 year
Number of followers
31
Documents
4502
Last sold
4 days ago

3.6

21 reviews

5
9
4
0
3
9
2
1
1
2

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their exams and reviewed by others who've used these revision notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No problem! You can straightaway pick a different document that better suits what you're after.

Pay as you like, start learning straight away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and smashed it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions