100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Exam (elaborations)

RCE2601 Assignment 2 Due 13 June 2025

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
16
Grade
A+
Uploaded on
06-06-2025
Written in
2024/2025

Case Study 1: Evaluating Sources for a Literature Review Total: 100 Marks ____________________________________________________________ SCENARIO Sarah is a postgraduate student researching the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on higher education. During her initial literature search, she comes across a variety of sources: • A blog post written by a technology enthusiast • A Wikipedia page. • A peer-reviewed journal article • A government report. Sarah is unsure which sources suit her literature review and needs to make informed decisions about credibility, relevance, and academic integrity. _____________________________________________________________________ Instructions: Read the scenario carefully and respond to the THREE TASKS BELOW. Your responses must demonstrate critical thinking and academic insight. Support your answers with examples where appropriate. Task 1: Source Evaluation (40 Marks) 1. Identify which sources Sarah should prioritise in her literature review and justify your answer. 2. Consider each source's reliability, authorship, publication process, and academic value in your response. Identify which sources are credible and should be prioritised. Justify the exclusion or limited use of other sources. Discuss how each source type can (or cannot) contribute to a literature review. Task 2: Credibility of Academic Sources (30 Marks) 1. Discuss the characteristics of credible academic sources. 2. Explain what makes a source academically credible and suitable for inclusion in a literature review. Guidelines for response: Include features such as peer-review, author qualifications, publication by academic or professional bodies, use of references, etc. Mention examples of credible sources such as academic journals, scholarly books, and official reports. Task 3: Academic Integrity and Citation (30 Marks) 1. Explain how Sarah can use citation styles to maintain academic integrity. 2. Describe the importance of proper citation and how using a consistent citation style (e.g., APA, Harvard, MLA) upholds academic standards. Guidelines for response: Define academic integrity and the role of citations. Provide examples of how to cite different types of sources. Discuss the consequences of failing to cite correctly and how citation prevents plagiarism. Submission Requirements Your case study response must be structured and written in formal academic language. Use headings or subheadings for each task. Word count guideline: 800–1000 words. Submit your responses by [as per module indication].

Show more Read less
Institution
Module









Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Connected book

Written for

Institution
Module

Document information

Uploaded on
June 6, 2025
File latest updated on
June 12, 2025
Number of pages
16
Written in
2024/2025
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers

Subjects

Content preview

RCE2601
Assignment 2
EXCEPTIONAL ANSWERS
Due 13 June 2025

, RCE2601 Assignment 2

Due: 13 June 2025


Task 1: Strategic Source Evaluation for a Postgraduate Literature Review

For Sarah’s rigorous postgraduate literature review, the peer-reviewed journal article
and the government report constitute the foundational and primary sources, given their
inherent academic rigor and authoritative provenance. Conversely, the blog post and
Wikipedia page, by their very nature, necessitate either cautious, supplementary usage
or outright exclusion due to significant concerns regarding their reliability, academic
rigor, and potential for unverified content. The subsequent evaluation delineates the
distinct attributes of each source type across critical dimensions: reliability, authorship,
publication process, and academic value.

• Peer-Reviewed Journal Article

• Reliability: Peer-reviewed articles undergo an exceptionally rigorous and
systematic scrutiny process by domain experts (scholars, researchers) prior to
publication. This stringent editorial and review mechanism ensures the
methodological soundness, empirical validity, and conceptual accuracy of the
research presented. Published in reputable academic journals, these articles
adhere to stringent ethical guidelines and scholarly conventions, thereby
establishing a high benchmark for scientific credibility.

• Authorship: The authors are invariably established scholars, senior researchers,
or leading academics with profound disciplinary expertise in the subject matter
(e.g., AI in education). Their affiliations with accredited academic or research
institutions, coupled with their advanced degrees and publication records, vouch
for their intellectual authority and scholarly contributions.

• Publication Process: The peer-review process typically involves multiple rounds
of blind or double-blind evaluation, wherein submissions are critically assessed
by independent experts. This rigorous gatekeeping mechanism serves to mitigate

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
LectureLab Teachme2-tutor
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
626
Member since
1 year
Number of followers
188
Documents
1022
Last sold
1 month ago
LectureLab

LectureLab: Crafted Clarity for Academic Success Welcome to LectureLab, your go-to source for clear, concise, and expertly crafted lecture notes. Designed to simplify complex topics and boost your grades, our study materials turn lectures into actionable insights. Whether you’re prepping for exams or mastering coursework, LectureLab empowers your learning journey. Explore our resources and ace your studies today!

3.6

80 reviews

5
32
4
14
3
16
2
4
1
14

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their exams and reviewed by others who've used these revision notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No problem! You can straightaway pick a different document that better suits what you're after.

Pay as you like, start learning straight away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and smashed it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions