Assignment: Critically reflect on specific events/incidents connected to the module journey and
the learning that they might have triggered. In a 2,000 word essay, construct a reflective account
of 3-5 meaningful events related to this module by comparing and contrasting their experience
with relevant theory.
Introduction
The report presented below covers a reflective assessment of the learning process undergone
throughout the study period of the module: Introduction to entrepreneurship. This includes a
detailed discussion of the groupwork assignment, presentation and theories learnt in the module.
This report seeks to provide an overview of what I have learnt in different aspects of the module.
Groupwork
For our groupwork, the initial plan was to divide the work among the different members.
According to Belbin, each individual in a team has different strengths and weaknesses (Belbin,
2010). Based on this factor, we decided to assess each members strengths and weaknesses before
distributing the work. However, after each member had pointed out each of their strengths and
weaknesses, we found that some members had the same strengths and weaknesses, and there
were tasks which would have been left unattended to. We therefore decided to discuss the work
together i.e., tackling each part of the questions together rather than each individual handling a
different section. The groupwork was in line with Tuckman’s four stages of groupwork: forming,
storming, norming and performing (Tuckman, 1965). At the beginning of the project, (Forming),
each member introduced themselves as we learnt each other’s strengths and weaknesses, and
getting to know each other better. However, after that, tension began to build as the group
experienced some conflict about how the project should be done (Storming). Some wanted the
work to be divided individually while others suggested working on it as a whole group. Despite
the disagreements, we eventually worked through the tension (Norming) by voting to reach a
consensus hence it was decided the work would be tackled by the group as a whole. Finally,
were able to work together in a productive manner and were able to complete the project on time
and with excellent results (Performing). The decision to handle the groupwork together was good
in many ways. Firstly, it allowed members to learn from each other as each individual shared
their unique knowledge and skills with the group. It also enabled the group to brainstorm ideas,
leading to a more effective outcome. Furthermore, it allowed for team cohesion and the
, development of interpersonal relationships among the members. However, the group failed in
some aspects as well. Particularly, there was a lack of accountability as each individual was not
assigned a specific task (Johnson et al., 2008). This meant that individuals were not always
motivated, and some members were not as committed to the groupwork as they should have
been. Through this project, I learnt the importance of effective communication and collaboration
among the members of the group. It is important to ensure that everyone is working together in a
productive manner, respecting each other’s ideas and opinions. I also learnt the importance of
delegating tasks and assigning roles and responsibilities among each member of the group i.e.,
everyone is held accountable for their actions and helps to ensure that the project runs smoothly.
In future, I would ensure that tasks are assigned to each individual in the group in order to ensure
that everyone is held accountable. I would also ensure that each member identifies their strengths
and weaknesses, in line with Belbin’s thinking, before delegating tasks. Furthermore, I would
ensure that everyone is on the same page regarding the objectives of the project, and that
everyone is clear on the roles and responsibilities of each group member. This would help to
ensure that the project is completed in an efficient and effective manner.
De Bono’s six hats
One of the most interesting concepts I learned in the module was De Bono’s six thinking hats.
Debono’s Six Hats is a creative thinking technique that encourages people to think differently by
wearing six different hats: white, red, black, yellow, green and blue (Bono, 1985). This technique
was developed by Edward de Bono and is used by many organizations to help people come up
with creative solutions to problems. Prior to the module, I had no knowledge of the Six Hats
technique and my understanding of the concept was limited. Introduction to the six thinking hats
in the module was my first encounter with the concept. My expectation was therefore to be able
to learn and fully understand this concept, and be able to apply it practically. The most surprising
and unexpected aspect of the lecture was how the conceptual framework was broken down into
different components. My professor explained that each “hat” represented a different perspective
or approach to thinking. The professor further explained that by wearing a different hat, we could
think about a problem in a more systematic and comprehensive manner. This was a concept that
I had never encountered before, and it made me realize that there are different ways to approach
problem-solving. My understanding of this concept has changed significantly since the lecture. I
the learning that they might have triggered. In a 2,000 word essay, construct a reflective account
of 3-5 meaningful events related to this module by comparing and contrasting their experience
with relevant theory.
Introduction
The report presented below covers a reflective assessment of the learning process undergone
throughout the study period of the module: Introduction to entrepreneurship. This includes a
detailed discussion of the groupwork assignment, presentation and theories learnt in the module.
This report seeks to provide an overview of what I have learnt in different aspects of the module.
Groupwork
For our groupwork, the initial plan was to divide the work among the different members.
According to Belbin, each individual in a team has different strengths and weaknesses (Belbin,
2010). Based on this factor, we decided to assess each members strengths and weaknesses before
distributing the work. However, after each member had pointed out each of their strengths and
weaknesses, we found that some members had the same strengths and weaknesses, and there
were tasks which would have been left unattended to. We therefore decided to discuss the work
together i.e., tackling each part of the questions together rather than each individual handling a
different section. The groupwork was in line with Tuckman’s four stages of groupwork: forming,
storming, norming and performing (Tuckman, 1965). At the beginning of the project, (Forming),
each member introduced themselves as we learnt each other’s strengths and weaknesses, and
getting to know each other better. However, after that, tension began to build as the group
experienced some conflict about how the project should be done (Storming). Some wanted the
work to be divided individually while others suggested working on it as a whole group. Despite
the disagreements, we eventually worked through the tension (Norming) by voting to reach a
consensus hence it was decided the work would be tackled by the group as a whole. Finally,
were able to work together in a productive manner and were able to complete the project on time
and with excellent results (Performing). The decision to handle the groupwork together was good
in many ways. Firstly, it allowed members to learn from each other as each individual shared
their unique knowledge and skills with the group. It also enabled the group to brainstorm ideas,
leading to a more effective outcome. Furthermore, it allowed for team cohesion and the
, development of interpersonal relationships among the members. However, the group failed in
some aspects as well. Particularly, there was a lack of accountability as each individual was not
assigned a specific task (Johnson et al., 2008). This meant that individuals were not always
motivated, and some members were not as committed to the groupwork as they should have
been. Through this project, I learnt the importance of effective communication and collaboration
among the members of the group. It is important to ensure that everyone is working together in a
productive manner, respecting each other’s ideas and opinions. I also learnt the importance of
delegating tasks and assigning roles and responsibilities among each member of the group i.e.,
everyone is held accountable for their actions and helps to ensure that the project runs smoothly.
In future, I would ensure that tasks are assigned to each individual in the group in order to ensure
that everyone is held accountable. I would also ensure that each member identifies their strengths
and weaknesses, in line with Belbin’s thinking, before delegating tasks. Furthermore, I would
ensure that everyone is on the same page regarding the objectives of the project, and that
everyone is clear on the roles and responsibilities of each group member. This would help to
ensure that the project is completed in an efficient and effective manner.
De Bono’s six hats
One of the most interesting concepts I learned in the module was De Bono’s six thinking hats.
Debono’s Six Hats is a creative thinking technique that encourages people to think differently by
wearing six different hats: white, red, black, yellow, green and blue (Bono, 1985). This technique
was developed by Edward de Bono and is used by many organizations to help people come up
with creative solutions to problems. Prior to the module, I had no knowledge of the Six Hats
technique and my understanding of the concept was limited. Introduction to the six thinking hats
in the module was my first encounter with the concept. My expectation was therefore to be able
to learn and fully understand this concept, and be able to apply it practically. The most surprising
and unexpected aspect of the lecture was how the conceptual framework was broken down into
different components. My professor explained that each “hat” represented a different perspective
or approach to thinking. The professor further explained that by wearing a different hat, we could
think about a problem in a more systematic and comprehensive manner. This was a concept that
I had never encountered before, and it made me realize that there are different ways to approach
problem-solving. My understanding of this concept has changed significantly since the lecture. I
